不同老年人的社会网络类型和自评健康:稳定性、过渡和健康公平的含义。

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-03-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf025
Lissette M Piedra, James Iveniuk
{"title":"不同老年人的社会网络类型和自评健康:稳定性、过渡和健康公平的含义。","authors":"Lissette M Piedra, James Iveniuk","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study explores how social networks among older adults evolve over time and their impact on self-rated health (SRH), emphasizing differences across ethnoracial and linguistic groups. Though the link between social networks and well-being is well-known, how these networks change and affect health remains less understood.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study examined changes in social network types across 3 rounds of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. The initial sample included 3 005 individuals, which decreased to 1 592 by the final follow-up. We analyzed data from participants in every round, totaling 6 858 observations, using Random-Intercept Latent Transition Analysis. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to predict network membership and transitions and to assess correlations with SRH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3 distinct social network types: \"Enriched,\" \"Focused,\" and \"Restricted.\" \"Enriched\" networks feature broad connections, high marriage rates, active engagement, and low loneliness. \"Focused\" networks involve small, close-knit groups with frequent interactions, moderate marriage rates, and low loneliness. \"Restricted\" networks are family-oriented, with low marriage rates and the highest loneliness levels. Over time, \"Restricted\" networks became more prevalent, whereas \"Focus\" networks showed the most mobility. Network type membership varied significantly by ethnoracial identity and gender, with Black, Hispanic, and female respondents less likely to belong to \"Enriched\" networks. Membership in \"Enriched\" networks was linked to better SRH scores.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The growth of \"Restricted\" networks over time raises concerns about older adults becoming confined to limited social environments. However, there is a silver lining: within the \"Focused\" group, more individuals transition to \"Enriched\" networks than to \"Restricted\" ones, indicating that older adults can expand their social connections as they age. Understanding the factors driving this shift can guide interventions to promote network expansion for vulnerable groups, enhancing social well-being, and mitigating the risks associated with restricted networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 6","pages":"igaf025"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Network Types and Self-Rated Health Among Diverse Older Adults: Stability, Transitions, and Implications for Health Equity.\",\"authors\":\"Lissette M Piedra, James Iveniuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igaf025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study explores how social networks among older adults evolve over time and their impact on self-rated health (SRH), emphasizing differences across ethnoracial and linguistic groups. Though the link between social networks and well-being is well-known, how these networks change and affect health remains less understood.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study examined changes in social network types across 3 rounds of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. The initial sample included 3 005 individuals, which decreased to 1 592 by the final follow-up. We analyzed data from participants in every round, totaling 6 858 observations, using Random-Intercept Latent Transition Analysis. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to predict network membership and transitions and to assess correlations with SRH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3 distinct social network types: \\\"Enriched,\\\" \\\"Focused,\\\" and \\\"Restricted.\\\" \\\"Enriched\\\" networks feature broad connections, high marriage rates, active engagement, and low loneliness. \\\"Focused\\\" networks involve small, close-knit groups with frequent interactions, moderate marriage rates, and low loneliness. \\\"Restricted\\\" networks are family-oriented, with low marriage rates and the highest loneliness levels. Over time, \\\"Restricted\\\" networks became more prevalent, whereas \\\"Focus\\\" networks showed the most mobility. Network type membership varied significantly by ethnoracial identity and gender, with Black, Hispanic, and female respondents less likely to belong to \\\"Enriched\\\" networks. Membership in \\\"Enriched\\\" networks was linked to better SRH scores.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The growth of \\\"Restricted\\\" networks over time raises concerns about older adults becoming confined to limited social environments. However, there is a silver lining: within the \\\"Focused\\\" group, more individuals transition to \\\"Enriched\\\" networks than to \\\"Restricted\\\" ones, indicating that older adults can expand their social connections as they age. Understanding the factors driving this shift can guide interventions to promote network expansion for vulnerable groups, enhancing social well-being, and mitigating the risks associated with restricted networks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"igaf025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188437/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本研究探讨老年人的社会网络如何随时间演变及其对自评健康(SRH)的影响,强调种族和语言群体之间的差异。虽然社会网络和幸福感之间的联系是众所周知的,但这些网络如何改变和影响健康仍然知之甚少。研究设计和方法:该研究考察了全国社会生活、健康和老龄化项目中三轮社会网络类型的变化。最初的样本包括3 005人,到最后的随访时减少到1 592人。我们分析了每一轮参与者的数据,总共6858个观察值,使用随机截距潜在过渡分析。进行多项逻辑回归来预测网络成员和过渡,并评估与SRH的相关性。结果:我们确定了3种不同的社交网络类型:“丰富”、“集中”和“受限”。“丰富”的社交网络具有广泛的联系、高结婚率、积极参与和低孤独感的特点。“聚焦型”网络包括小而紧密的群体,他们经常互动,结婚率适中,孤独感低。“受限”网络以家庭为导向,结婚率低,孤独感最高。随着时间的推移,“受限”网络变得更加普遍,而“聚焦”网络则显示出最大的流动性。网络成员类型因种族身份和性别而有显著差异,黑人、西班牙裔和女性受访者不太可能属于“富裕”网络。“丰富”网络的成员资格与更高的SRH分数有关。讨论和启示:随着时间的推移,“受限”网络的增长引起了人们对老年人被限制在有限的社会环境中的担忧。然而,也有一线希望:在“专注”组中,更多的人过渡到“丰富”的网络,而不是“限制”的网络,这表明老年人可以随着年龄的增长扩大他们的社会关系。了解推动这一转变的因素可以指导采取干预措施,促进弱势群体的网络扩展,提高社会福祉,并减轻与受限网络相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Network Types and Self-Rated Health Among Diverse Older Adults: Stability, Transitions, and Implications for Health Equity.

Background and objectives: This study explores how social networks among older adults evolve over time and their impact on self-rated health (SRH), emphasizing differences across ethnoracial and linguistic groups. Though the link between social networks and well-being is well-known, how these networks change and affect health remains less understood.

Research design and methods: The study examined changes in social network types across 3 rounds of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. The initial sample included 3 005 individuals, which decreased to 1 592 by the final follow-up. We analyzed data from participants in every round, totaling 6 858 observations, using Random-Intercept Latent Transition Analysis. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to predict network membership and transitions and to assess correlations with SRH.

Results: We identified 3 distinct social network types: "Enriched," "Focused," and "Restricted." "Enriched" networks feature broad connections, high marriage rates, active engagement, and low loneliness. "Focused" networks involve small, close-knit groups with frequent interactions, moderate marriage rates, and low loneliness. "Restricted" networks are family-oriented, with low marriage rates and the highest loneliness levels. Over time, "Restricted" networks became more prevalent, whereas "Focus" networks showed the most mobility. Network type membership varied significantly by ethnoracial identity and gender, with Black, Hispanic, and female respondents less likely to belong to "Enriched" networks. Membership in "Enriched" networks was linked to better SRH scores.

Discussion and implications: The growth of "Restricted" networks over time raises concerns about older adults becoming confined to limited social environments. However, there is a silver lining: within the "Focused" group, more individuals transition to "Enriched" networks than to "Restricted" ones, indicating that older adults can expand their social connections as they age. Understanding the factors driving this shift can guide interventions to promote network expansion for vulnerable groups, enhancing social well-being, and mitigating the risks associated with restricted networks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信