种族少数群体所经历的差异导致了药物使用障碍的治疗差距和缺乏获得资源和支持的机会。

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf030
Marissa K Mackiewicz, Jodi Winship, Patricia Slattum, Leland Waters
{"title":"种族少数群体所经历的差异导致了药物使用障碍的治疗差距和缺乏获得资源和支持的机会。","authors":"Marissa K Mackiewicz, Jodi Winship, Patricia Slattum, Leland Waters","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Problematic substance use among older adults is rising. Although rates of substance use disorder (SUD) are higher among younger populations, the percentage of older adults with SUD had the highest increase between 2020 and 2021 of any age demographic. Disparities experienced by racial minorities contribute to treatment gaps and lack of access to SUD resources. This study explores the perspectives of low-income, urban-dwelling, primarily racial minority older adults on SUD treatment and recovery.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Adults aged 50 years and older residing in urban low-income apartment buildings in Richmond, VA who self-identified as having a history of substance use were recruited to participate in semistructured interviews about their beliefs on substance use and aging, perceptions of treatment options and barriers to SUD-related recovery supports, and views around peer support. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Inductive qualitative thematic analysis of the interviews was conducted using the framework method of analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews were conducted with 16 individuals. The mean age was 65.6 years, 56% identified as male, 25% did not complete high school, 50% reported an annual income under $10,000, and 81.3% were Black. Nine themes were identified from the qualitative analysis: Causes of SUD, stigma and misconceptions about SUD, SUD treatments, SUD self-help, SUD and aging, barriers to treatment, defining recovery, lack of knowledge of current terminology, and the role of technology. They perceive that the reasons underlying SUD differ with age, with younger people more influenced by social pressure/environment and older people by social isolation or loneliness.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This study highlights the perspectives of low-income, racial minority older adults providing insights into barriers to SUD treatment and recovery, opportunities for community education, and adaptation of current treatment strategies to meet the needs of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 6","pages":"igaf030"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities Experienced by Racial Minorities Contribute to Treatment Gaps and Lack of Access to Resources and Supports for Substance Use Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Marissa K Mackiewicz, Jodi Winship, Patricia Slattum, Leland Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igaf030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Problematic substance use among older adults is rising. Although rates of substance use disorder (SUD) are higher among younger populations, the percentage of older adults with SUD had the highest increase between 2020 and 2021 of any age demographic. Disparities experienced by racial minorities contribute to treatment gaps and lack of access to SUD resources. This study explores the perspectives of low-income, urban-dwelling, primarily racial minority older adults on SUD treatment and recovery.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Adults aged 50 years and older residing in urban low-income apartment buildings in Richmond, VA who self-identified as having a history of substance use were recruited to participate in semistructured interviews about their beliefs on substance use and aging, perceptions of treatment options and barriers to SUD-related recovery supports, and views around peer support. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Inductive qualitative thematic analysis of the interviews was conducted using the framework method of analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews were conducted with 16 individuals. The mean age was 65.6 years, 56% identified as male, 25% did not complete high school, 50% reported an annual income under $10,000, and 81.3% were Black. Nine themes were identified from the qualitative analysis: Causes of SUD, stigma and misconceptions about SUD, SUD treatments, SUD self-help, SUD and aging, barriers to treatment, defining recovery, lack of knowledge of current terminology, and the role of technology. They perceive that the reasons underlying SUD differ with age, with younger people more influenced by social pressure/environment and older people by social isolation or loneliness.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This study highlights the perspectives of low-income, racial minority older adults providing insights into barriers to SUD treatment and recovery, opportunities for community education, and adaptation of current treatment strategies to meet the needs of this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"igaf030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:老年人中有问题的物质使用正在上升。尽管年轻人群中物质使用障碍(SUD)的比例较高,但在2020年至2021年期间,患有SUD的老年人比例的增幅最高。少数种族所经历的差异导致了治疗差距和缺乏获得SUD资源的机会。本研究探讨了低收入、城市居住、主要是少数种族的老年人对SUD治疗和康复的看法。研究设计和方法:招募了居住在弗吉尼亚州里士满市城市低收入公寓大楼的50岁及以上的成年人,他们自认为有药物使用史,参与半结构化访谈,了解他们对药物使用和衰老的看法,对治疗方案的看法,对与吸毒有关的康复支持的障碍,以及对同伴支持的看法。采访被记录下来并记录下来。采用框架分析法对访谈进行归纳定性专题分析。结果:共访谈16人。平均年龄为65.6岁,56%为男性,25%未完成高中学业,50%年收入低于1万美元,81.3%为黑人。定性分析确定了9个主题:SUD的原因、耻辱感和对SUD的误解、SUD治疗、SUD自助、SUD与衰老、治疗障碍、康复定义、缺乏对当前术语的了解以及技术的作用。他们认为,导致SUD的原因因年龄而异,年轻人更多地受到社会压力/环境的影响,而老年人更多地受到社会孤立或孤独的影响。讨论和启示:本研究强调了低收入、少数族裔老年人的观点,提供了对SUD治疗和康复障碍、社区教育机会以及适应当前治疗策略以满足这一人群需求的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities Experienced by Racial Minorities Contribute to Treatment Gaps and Lack of Access to Resources and Supports for Substance Use Disorders.

Background and objectives: Problematic substance use among older adults is rising. Although rates of substance use disorder (SUD) are higher among younger populations, the percentage of older adults with SUD had the highest increase between 2020 and 2021 of any age demographic. Disparities experienced by racial minorities contribute to treatment gaps and lack of access to SUD resources. This study explores the perspectives of low-income, urban-dwelling, primarily racial minority older adults on SUD treatment and recovery.

Research design and methods: Adults aged 50 years and older residing in urban low-income apartment buildings in Richmond, VA who self-identified as having a history of substance use were recruited to participate in semistructured interviews about their beliefs on substance use and aging, perceptions of treatment options and barriers to SUD-related recovery supports, and views around peer support. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Inductive qualitative thematic analysis of the interviews was conducted using the framework method of analysis.

Results: Interviews were conducted with 16 individuals. The mean age was 65.6 years, 56% identified as male, 25% did not complete high school, 50% reported an annual income under $10,000, and 81.3% were Black. Nine themes were identified from the qualitative analysis: Causes of SUD, stigma and misconceptions about SUD, SUD treatments, SUD self-help, SUD and aging, barriers to treatment, defining recovery, lack of knowledge of current terminology, and the role of technology. They perceive that the reasons underlying SUD differ with age, with younger people more influenced by social pressure/environment and older people by social isolation or loneliness.

Discussion and implications: This study highlights the perspectives of low-income, racial minority older adults providing insights into barriers to SUD treatment and recovery, opportunities for community education, and adaptation of current treatment strategies to meet the needs of this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信