埃塞俄比亚西达马地区新生儿脚长筛查工具用于母亲识别小婴儿的准确性和实用性。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Fitsum Weldegebriel Belay, Fanuel Belayneh Bekele, Rekiku Fikre, Akalewold Alemayehu, Hannah Richards, Andrew Clarke, Sarah Williams, Yohannes Chanyalew Kassa
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚西达马地区新生儿脚长筛查工具用于母亲识别小婴儿的准确性和实用性。","authors":"Fitsum Weldegebriel Belay, Fanuel Belayneh Bekele, Rekiku Fikre, Akalewold Alemayehu, Hannah Richards, Andrew Clarke, Sarah Williams, Yohannes Chanyalew Kassa","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simple, low-cost anthropometric screening tools like foot length (FL) can be used to screen for small babies (low birth weight (LBW) or preterm) delivered at home or in facilities where functional weighing scales are unavailable. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and utility of newborn FL screening tools to help identify small babies by mothers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method study was conducted at selected health facilities from 15 May to 6 July 2024. The consecutive sample included 396 mother-newborn dyads. Mothers screened newborns using laminated cards and plastic tools with colour codes (green/red) based on a 73 mm FL cut-off. In-depth interviews were also conducted with purposively selected participating mothers. The screening tools' diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean maternal age was 26.9 years. There were 61 (15.4%) LBW and 48 (12.3%) preterm babies. Using the laminated card, mothers classified 39.4% of newborns as having a short foot, while 33.1% were classified as such using the plastic tool. The plastic tool showed LBW identification accuracy of 0.82 area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.82 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.87) compared with the laminated card AUC: 0.75 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.81). For preterm identification, both tools performed similarly (AUC: 0.73-0.74). Compared with the laminated card (81.9% sensitivity and 68.4% specificity), the plastic tool (86.9% sensitivity and 76.7% specificity) would miss fewer LBW babies and reduce unnecessary referrals. The qualitative findings also suggested that a smooth surface, footprint picture, colour codes and heel holder can increase acceptability and utilisation of the FL screening tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FL screening tools made from plastic or card with colour codes can be used by mothers to help identify LBW and preterm babies. Area-specific cut-off points, a smooth surface with a footprint picture and a heel holder, should be considered while designing colour-coded FL screening tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and utility of newborn foot length screening tools to identify small babies by mothers in Sidama Region, Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Fitsum Weldegebriel Belay, Fanuel Belayneh Bekele, Rekiku Fikre, Akalewold Alemayehu, Hannah Richards, Andrew Clarke, Sarah Williams, Yohannes Chanyalew Kassa\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simple, low-cost anthropometric screening tools like foot length (FL) can be used to screen for small babies (low birth weight (LBW) or preterm) delivered at home or in facilities where functional weighing scales are unavailable. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and utility of newborn FL screening tools to help identify small babies by mothers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method study was conducted at selected health facilities from 15 May to 6 July 2024. The consecutive sample included 396 mother-newborn dyads. Mothers screened newborns using laminated cards and plastic tools with colour codes (green/red) based on a 73 mm FL cut-off. In-depth interviews were also conducted with purposively selected participating mothers. The screening tools' diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean maternal age was 26.9 years. There were 61 (15.4%) LBW and 48 (12.3%) preterm babies. Using the laminated card, mothers classified 39.4% of newborns as having a short foot, while 33.1% were classified as such using the plastic tool. The plastic tool showed LBW identification accuracy of 0.82 area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.82 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.87) compared with the laminated card AUC: 0.75 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.81). For preterm identification, both tools performed similarly (AUC: 0.73-0.74). Compared with the laminated card (81.9% sensitivity and 68.4% specificity), the plastic tool (86.9% sensitivity and 76.7% specificity) would miss fewer LBW babies and reduce unnecessary referrals. The qualitative findings also suggested that a smooth surface, footprint picture, colour codes and heel holder can increase acceptability and utilisation of the FL screening tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FL screening tools made from plastic or card with colour codes can be used by mothers to help identify LBW and preterm babies. Area-specific cut-off points, a smooth surface with a footprint picture and a heel holder, should be considered while designing colour-coded FL screening tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:简单、低成本的人体测量筛查工具,如足长(FL),可用于筛查在家中或在没有功能磅秤的设施中分娩的小婴儿(低出生体重(LBW)或早产)。本研究旨在评估新生儿FL筛查工具的准确性和实用性,以帮助母亲识别小婴儿。方法:2024年5月15日至7月6日在选定的卫生机构进行了一项混合方法研究。连续的样本包括396对母子二人组。母亲们使用层压卡片和带有颜色代码(绿色/红色)的塑料工具筛选新生儿,这些工具基于73毫米的FL截止。我们还对有意挑选的参与调查的母亲进行了深入访谈。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析评价筛查工具的诊断准确性。结果:产妇平均年龄26.9岁。低体重儿61例(15.4%),早产儿48例(12.3%)。在使用卡片时,母亲将39.4%的新生儿归类为脚短,而使用塑料工具时则将33.1%的新生儿归类为脚短。塑料工具在接收者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的LBW识别精度为0.82,AUC为0.82 (95% CI 0.77 ~ 0.87),而层压卡的AUC为0.75 (95% CI 0.69 ~ 0.81)。对于早产鉴定,两种工具的表现相似(AUC: 0.73-0.74)。与层压卡(敏感度81.9%,特异度68.4%)相比,塑料工具(敏感度86.9%,特异度76.7%)可减少LBW婴儿的漏诊,减少不必要的转诊。定性研究结果还表明,光滑的表面、脚印图片、颜色代码和鞋跟支架可以提高FL筛选工具的可接受性和利用率。结论:母亲可以使用塑料或彩色卡片制作的FL筛查工具来帮助识别LBW和早产儿。在设计颜色编码的FL筛选工具时,应考虑特定区域的截止点,具有足迹图片和后跟支架的光滑表面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy and utility of newborn foot length screening tools to identify small babies by mothers in Sidama Region, Ethiopia.

Background: Simple, low-cost anthropometric screening tools like foot length (FL) can be used to screen for small babies (low birth weight (LBW) or preterm) delivered at home or in facilities where functional weighing scales are unavailable. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and utility of newborn FL screening tools to help identify small babies by mothers.

Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted at selected health facilities from 15 May to 6 July 2024. The consecutive sample included 396 mother-newborn dyads. Mothers screened newborns using laminated cards and plastic tools with colour codes (green/red) based on a 73 mm FL cut-off. In-depth interviews were also conducted with purposively selected participating mothers. The screening tools' diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

Results: The mean maternal age was 26.9 years. There were 61 (15.4%) LBW and 48 (12.3%) preterm babies. Using the laminated card, mothers classified 39.4% of newborns as having a short foot, while 33.1% were classified as such using the plastic tool. The plastic tool showed LBW identification accuracy of 0.82 area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.82 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.87) compared with the laminated card AUC: 0.75 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.81). For preterm identification, both tools performed similarly (AUC: 0.73-0.74). Compared with the laminated card (81.9% sensitivity and 68.4% specificity), the plastic tool (86.9% sensitivity and 76.7% specificity) would miss fewer LBW babies and reduce unnecessary referrals. The qualitative findings also suggested that a smooth surface, footprint picture, colour codes and heel holder can increase acceptability and utilisation of the FL screening tools.

Conclusion: FL screening tools made from plastic or card with colour codes can be used by mothers to help identify LBW and preterm babies. Area-specific cut-off points, a smooth surface with a footprint picture and a heel holder, should be considered while designing colour-coded FL screening tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信