执行功能测试的成人寿命标准数据(18-92岁);Stroop颜色单词测试、COWAT和Hayling句子完成测试。

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Patrick Murphy, Emily Webster, Lisa Cipolotti
{"title":"执行功能测试的成人寿命标准数据(18-92岁);Stroop颜色单词测试、COWAT和Hayling句子完成测试。","authors":"Patrick Murphy, Emily Webster, Lisa Cipolotti","doi":"10.1111/jnp.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neuropsychological assessment of executive functions is an important part of the diagnostic process for many neurological diseases and for predicting the ability of neurological patients to function independently. Unfortunately, for the majority of commonly used executive function tests there is a paucity of updated normative data, particularly for older adults. This complicates the process of a clinically meaningful assessment. To help address this, we provide normative data for three well-validated tests of executive functions, the Stroop Colour/Word Test, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and the Hayling Sentence Completion Test, alongside scores from an estimate of general intellectual ability. These tests are sensitive to frontal lobe damage and provide clinicians with information about possible focal damage to the left and right frontal lobes. Percentiles are presented for five age cohorts across the adult lifespan (18-92 years). A regression equation with age and predicted full-scale IQ also allows for the categorisation of normal and defective performance on the Stroop and Hayling tests. Given the increasing proportion of older adults requiring neuropsychological assessment, we investigated separately two groups in the older adult range: 65-79 years and 80-92 years. We found a decline in performance for older adults on all three tests. This decline was more marked amongst lower scoring older adults. We did not find a significant relationship between sex and performance on any of the three tests. The findings are discussed in the light of the cognitive reserve theory of ageing.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult lifespan normative data (18-92 years) for executive function tests; the Stroop colour word test, COWAT and Hayling sentence completion test.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Murphy, Emily Webster, Lisa Cipolotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnp.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The neuropsychological assessment of executive functions is an important part of the diagnostic process for many neurological diseases and for predicting the ability of neurological patients to function independently. Unfortunately, for the majority of commonly used executive function tests there is a paucity of updated normative data, particularly for older adults. This complicates the process of a clinically meaningful assessment. To help address this, we provide normative data for three well-validated tests of executive functions, the Stroop Colour/Word Test, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and the Hayling Sentence Completion Test, alongside scores from an estimate of general intellectual ability. These tests are sensitive to frontal lobe damage and provide clinicians with information about possible focal damage to the left and right frontal lobes. Percentiles are presented for five age cohorts across the adult lifespan (18-92 years). A regression equation with age and predicted full-scale IQ also allows for the categorisation of normal and defective performance on the Stroop and Hayling tests. Given the increasing proportion of older adults requiring neuropsychological assessment, we investigated separately two groups in the older adult range: 65-79 years and 80-92 years. We found a decline in performance for older adults on all three tests. This decline was more marked amongst lower scoring older adults. We did not find a significant relationship between sex and performance on any of the three tests. The findings are discussed in the light of the cognitive reserve theory of ageing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.70001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

执行功能的神经心理学评估是许多神经系统疾病诊断过程的重要组成部分,也是预测神经系统患者独立运作能力的重要组成部分。不幸的是,对于大多数常用的执行功能测试,缺乏更新的规范数据,特别是对于老年人。这使临床有意义的评估过程变得复杂。为了帮助解决这个问题,我们提供了三个经过验证的执行功能测试的规范数据,即Stroop颜色/单词测试,受控口头单词联想测试和Hayling句子完成测试,以及一般智力能力的估计分数。这些测试对额叶损伤很敏感,为临床医生提供了左右额叶可能局灶性损伤的信息。百分位数呈现在成人寿命(18-92岁)的5个年龄组。年龄和预测的全面智商的回归方程也允许在Stroop和Hayling测试中对正常和有缺陷的表现进行分类。鉴于需要神经心理学评估的老年人比例的增加,我们在老年人范围内分别调查了两组:65-79岁和80-92岁。我们发现老年人在所有三项测试中的表现都有所下降。这种下降在得分较低的老年人中更为明显。在这三个测试中,我们没有发现性别和表现之间有显著的关系。根据衰老的认知储备理论对研究结果进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adult lifespan normative data (18-92 years) for executive function tests; the Stroop colour word test, COWAT and Hayling sentence completion test.

The neuropsychological assessment of executive functions is an important part of the diagnostic process for many neurological diseases and for predicting the ability of neurological patients to function independently. Unfortunately, for the majority of commonly used executive function tests there is a paucity of updated normative data, particularly for older adults. This complicates the process of a clinically meaningful assessment. To help address this, we provide normative data for three well-validated tests of executive functions, the Stroop Colour/Word Test, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and the Hayling Sentence Completion Test, alongside scores from an estimate of general intellectual ability. These tests are sensitive to frontal lobe damage and provide clinicians with information about possible focal damage to the left and right frontal lobes. Percentiles are presented for five age cohorts across the adult lifespan (18-92 years). A regression equation with age and predicted full-scale IQ also allows for the categorisation of normal and defective performance on the Stroop and Hayling tests. Given the increasing proportion of older adults requiring neuropsychological assessment, we investigated separately two groups in the older adult range: 65-79 years and 80-92 years. We found a decline in performance for older adults on all three tests. This decline was more marked amongst lower scoring older adults. We did not find a significant relationship between sex and performance on any of the three tests. The findings are discussed in the light of the cognitive reserve theory of ageing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuropsychology
Journal of Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including: • clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups • behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes • cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging • multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science The following types of paper are invited: • papers reporting original empirical investigations • theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data • review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications • brief reports and comments • case reports • fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors) • special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信