罗马尼亚西北部产β-内酰胺酶的ESBL和AmpC大肠杆菌分离株的表型和基因型分析

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Anca Rus, Iulia-Maria Bucur, Kalman Imre, Andreea Talida Tirziu, Andrei Alexandru Ivan, Radu Valentin Gros, Alex Cristian Moza, Sebastian Alexandru Popa, Alexandra Ban-Cucerzan, Emil Tirziu
{"title":"罗马尼亚西北部产β-内酰胺酶的ESBL和AmpC大肠杆菌分离株的表型和基因型分析","authors":"Anca Rus, Iulia-Maria Bucur, Kalman Imre, Andreea Talida Tirziu, Andrei Alexandru Ivan, Radu Valentin Gros, Alex Cristian Moza, Sebastian Alexandru Popa, Alexandra Ban-Cucerzan, Emil Tirziu","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14060578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The widespread use of antibiotics in animal husbandry has led to an increase in antimicrobial-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i>, particularly strains producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and <i>Amp</i>C β-lactamases. This study aimed to isolate and characterize such strains from fecal samples of broiler chickens (n = 71) and slaughtered turkeys (n = 31) in northwestern Romania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and PCR were used to evaluate phenotypic resistance patterns and detect the presence of resistance genes (<i>Amp</i>C, <i>bla</i>Z, and <i>bla</i>TEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that 55% of turkey and 61% of broiler isolates were presumptive ESBL/<i>Amp</i>C producers. Among all isolates, 50% were classified as extensively drug-resistant (XDR), 44% as multidrug-resistant (MDR), and only 6% were fully susceptible. Gene detection revealed an overall prevalence of 44.2% for <i>Amp</i>C, 72.7% for <i>bla</i>Z, and 58.1% for <i>bla</i>TEM, yielding a total penetrance of 51.09%. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) values, ranging from 0.67 to 81, suggest the efficacy of the antibiotic susceptibility testing method used in detecting the presence of these resistance genes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these findings highlight a significant burden of antimicrobial-resistant, poultry-associated <i>E. coli</i> strains, warranting stricter antimicrobial stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of ESBL and <i>Amp</i>C β-Lactamase-Producing <i>E. coli</i> Isolates from Poultry in Northwestern Romania.\",\"authors\":\"Anca Rus, Iulia-Maria Bucur, Kalman Imre, Andreea Talida Tirziu, Andrei Alexandru Ivan, Radu Valentin Gros, Alex Cristian Moza, Sebastian Alexandru Popa, Alexandra Ban-Cucerzan, Emil Tirziu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics14060578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The widespread use of antibiotics in animal husbandry has led to an increase in antimicrobial-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i>, particularly strains producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and <i>Amp</i>C β-lactamases. This study aimed to isolate and characterize such strains from fecal samples of broiler chickens (n = 71) and slaughtered turkeys (n = 31) in northwestern Romania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and PCR were used to evaluate phenotypic resistance patterns and detect the presence of resistance genes (<i>Amp</i>C, <i>bla</i>Z, and <i>bla</i>TEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that 55% of turkey and 61% of broiler isolates were presumptive ESBL/<i>Amp</i>C producers. Among all isolates, 50% were classified as extensively drug-resistant (XDR), 44% as multidrug-resistant (MDR), and only 6% were fully susceptible. Gene detection revealed an overall prevalence of 44.2% for <i>Amp</i>C, 72.7% for <i>bla</i>Z, and 58.1% for <i>bla</i>TEM, yielding a total penetrance of 51.09%. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) values, ranging from 0.67 to 81, suggest the efficacy of the antibiotic susceptibility testing method used in detecting the presence of these resistance genes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these findings highlight a significant burden of antimicrobial-resistant, poultry-associated <i>E. coli</i> strains, warranting stricter antimicrobial stewardship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060578\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:抗生素在畜牧业中的广泛使用导致了耐药大肠杆菌的增加,特别是产生广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和AmpC β-内酰胺酶的菌株。本研究旨在从罗马尼亚西北部肉鸡(n = 71)和屠宰火鸡(n = 31)的粪便样本中分离和鉴定这些菌株。方法:采用药敏试验和聚合酶链式反应(PCR)方法评价病原菌的表型耐药模式,检测耐药基因(AmpC、blaZ、blaTEM)的存在。结果:结果表明55%的火鸡和61%的肉鸡分离株是假定的ESBL/AmpC生产者。在所有分离株中,50%被列为广泛耐药(XDR), 44%被列为多重耐药(MDR),只有6%是完全敏感的。基因检测显示AmpC、blaZ和blaTEM的总患病率分别为44.2%、72.7%和58.1%,总外显率为51.09%。诊断优势比(DOR)值范围为0.67 ~ 81,表明抗生素药敏试验方法在检测这些耐药基因存在方面的有效性。结论:总的来说,这些发现突出了具有抗菌素耐药性的家禽相关大肠杆菌菌株的重大负担,需要更严格的抗菌素管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of ESBL and AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing E. coli Isolates from Poultry in Northwestern Romania.

Background/objectives: The widespread use of antibiotics in animal husbandry has led to an increase in antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli, particularly strains producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamases. This study aimed to isolate and characterize such strains from fecal samples of broiler chickens (n = 71) and slaughtered turkeys (n = 31) in northwestern Romania.

Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and PCR were used to evaluate phenotypic resistance patterns and detect the presence of resistance genes (AmpC, blaZ, and blaTEM).

Results: The results showed that 55% of turkey and 61% of broiler isolates were presumptive ESBL/AmpC producers. Among all isolates, 50% were classified as extensively drug-resistant (XDR), 44% as multidrug-resistant (MDR), and only 6% were fully susceptible. Gene detection revealed an overall prevalence of 44.2% for AmpC, 72.7% for blaZ, and 58.1% for blaTEM, yielding a total penetrance of 51.09%. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) values, ranging from 0.67 to 81, suggest the efficacy of the antibiotic susceptibility testing method used in detecting the presence of these resistance genes.

Conclusion: Overall, these findings highlight a significant burden of antimicrobial-resistant, poultry-associated E. coli strains, warranting stricter antimicrobial stewardship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信