目前在美国广泛采用噬菌体治疗的临床实验室挑战。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ahnika Kline, Ana G Cobián Güemes, Jennifer Yore, Chandrabali Ghose, Daria Van Tyne, Katrine Whiteson, David T Pride
{"title":"目前在美国广泛采用噬菌体治疗的临床实验室挑战。","authors":"Ahnika Kline, Ana G Cobián Güemes, Jennifer Yore, Chandrabali Ghose, Daria Van Tyne, Katrine Whiteson, David T Pride","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14060553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The resurgence of phage therapy in Western societies has been in direct response to recent increases in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) that have ravaged many societies. While phage therapy as a concept has been around for over 100 years, it has largely been replaced by antibiotics due to their relative ease of use and their predictability in spectrum of activity. Now that antibiotics have become less reliable due to greater antibiotic resistance and microbiome disruption, phage therapy has once again become a viable and promising alternative, but it is not without its challenges. Much like the development of antibiotics, with deployment of phage therapeutics there will be a simultaneous need for diagnostics in the clinical laboratory. This review provides an overview of current challenges to widespread adoption of phage therapy with a focus on adoption in the clinical diagnostic laboratory. Current barriers include a lack of standard methodology and quality controls for phage susceptibility testing and selection, the absence of phage-antibiotic synergy testing, and the absence of standard methods to assay phage activity on biofilms. Additionally, there are a number of lab-specific administrative and regulatory barriers to widespread phage therapy adoption including the need for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) assays, methods to account for changes in phages after passaging, an absence of regulatory guidance on what will be required for agency approvals of phages and how broad that approval will apply, and the increased need for lab personnel or automation to account for the work of testing large phage libraries against bacteria isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Clinical Laboratory Challenges to Widespread Adoption of Phage Therapy in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ahnika Kline, Ana G Cobián Güemes, Jennifer Yore, Chandrabali Ghose, Daria Van Tyne, Katrine Whiteson, David T Pride\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics14060553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The resurgence of phage therapy in Western societies has been in direct response to recent increases in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) that have ravaged many societies. While phage therapy as a concept has been around for over 100 years, it has largely been replaced by antibiotics due to their relative ease of use and their predictability in spectrum of activity. Now that antibiotics have become less reliable due to greater antibiotic resistance and microbiome disruption, phage therapy has once again become a viable and promising alternative, but it is not without its challenges. Much like the development of antibiotics, with deployment of phage therapeutics there will be a simultaneous need for diagnostics in the clinical laboratory. This review provides an overview of current challenges to widespread adoption of phage therapy with a focus on adoption in the clinical diagnostic laboratory. Current barriers include a lack of standard methodology and quality controls for phage susceptibility testing and selection, the absence of phage-antibiotic synergy testing, and the absence of standard methods to assay phage activity on biofilms. Additionally, there are a number of lab-specific administrative and regulatory barriers to widespread phage therapy adoption including the need for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) assays, methods to account for changes in phages after passaging, an absence of regulatory guidance on what will be required for agency approvals of phages and how broad that approval will apply, and the increased need for lab personnel or automation to account for the work of testing large phage libraries against bacteria isolates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060553\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

噬菌体疗法在西方社会的复兴是对最近肆虐许多社会的抗菌素耐药性(AMR)增加的直接反应。虽然噬菌体治疗作为一个概念已经存在了100多年,但由于其相对易于使用和其活性谱的可预测性,它已在很大程度上被抗生素所取代。现在,由于抗生素耐药性和微生物群的破坏,抗生素变得不那么可靠,噬菌体疗法再次成为一种可行和有前途的替代方案,但它并非没有挑战。就像抗生素的发展一样,随着噬菌体疗法的部署,临床实验室将同时需要诊断。这篇综述概述了目前广泛采用噬菌体治疗的挑战,重点是临床诊断实验室的采用。目前的障碍包括缺乏噬菌体敏感性测试和选择的标准方法和质量控制,缺乏噬菌体-抗生素协同试验,以及缺乏测定生物膜上噬菌体活性的标准方法。此外,广泛采用噬菌体疗法存在许多实验室特定的行政和监管障碍,包括需要药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)测定,解释噬菌体传代后变化的方法,缺乏关于机构批准噬菌体所需条件以及批准范围的监管指导。此外,对实验室人员或自动化的需求也在增加,以解决大型噬菌体库对细菌分离物的测试工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current Clinical Laboratory Challenges to Widespread Adoption of Phage Therapy in the United States.

The resurgence of phage therapy in Western societies has been in direct response to recent increases in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) that have ravaged many societies. While phage therapy as a concept has been around for over 100 years, it has largely been replaced by antibiotics due to their relative ease of use and their predictability in spectrum of activity. Now that antibiotics have become less reliable due to greater antibiotic resistance and microbiome disruption, phage therapy has once again become a viable and promising alternative, but it is not without its challenges. Much like the development of antibiotics, with deployment of phage therapeutics there will be a simultaneous need for diagnostics in the clinical laboratory. This review provides an overview of current challenges to widespread adoption of phage therapy with a focus on adoption in the clinical diagnostic laboratory. Current barriers include a lack of standard methodology and quality controls for phage susceptibility testing and selection, the absence of phage-antibiotic synergy testing, and the absence of standard methods to assay phage activity on biofilms. Additionally, there are a number of lab-specific administrative and regulatory barriers to widespread phage therapy adoption including the need for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) assays, methods to account for changes in phages after passaging, an absence of regulatory guidance on what will be required for agency approvals of phages and how broad that approval will apply, and the increased need for lab personnel or automation to account for the work of testing large phage libraries against bacteria isolates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信