西班牙大学入学考试评估委员会的一致性分析。

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alejandro Veas, José-Antonio López-Pina
{"title":"西班牙大学入学考试评估委员会的一致性分析。","authors":"Alejandro Veas, José-Antonio López-Pina","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15060102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>University entrance examinations (EBAU in Spanish) are a nationwide program for assessing student achievement levels in Spain and determining access to public undergraduate degrees. Considering the need to measure the progress of rater performance, this study analyzes rating data from the June 2018 exam sitting in the Valencian Community, Spain. A total of 54 assessment boards and 3000 students from five public universities were observed. The Many-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM) was used as an extension of the one-parameter Rasch measurement model. All facets involved in analyses (examination board severity, subject difficulty, and group performance) were located on a common underlying linear scale. The results showed large inconsistencies in the rating process, with differences in the severity levels of many subjects both within and between universities. This study may serve as a starting point for a reflective debate on the need to apply better criteria for ensuring the comparability of examination standards in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency Analysis of Assessment Boards in University Entrance Examinations in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Veas, José-Antonio López-Pina\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ejihpe15060102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>University entrance examinations (EBAU in Spanish) are a nationwide program for assessing student achievement levels in Spain and determining access to public undergraduate degrees. Considering the need to measure the progress of rater performance, this study analyzes rating data from the June 2018 exam sitting in the Valencian Community, Spain. A total of 54 assessment boards and 3000 students from five public universities were observed. The Many-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM) was used as an extension of the one-parameter Rasch measurement model. All facets involved in analyses (examination board severity, subject difficulty, and group performance) were located on a common underlying linear scale. The results showed large inconsistencies in the rating process, with differences in the severity levels of many subjects both within and between universities. This study may serve as a starting point for a reflective debate on the need to apply better criteria for ensuring the comparability of examination standards in Spain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191483/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15060102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15060102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大学入学考试(西班牙语EBAU)是一项全国性的计划,用于评估西班牙学生的成绩水平,并确定获得公立本科学位的机会。考虑到需要衡量评分者的表现进展,本研究分析了西班牙巴伦西亚社区2018年6月考试的评分数据。共有54个评核委员会和来自5所公立大学的3000名学生接受了调查。采用多面Rasch模型(MFRM)作为单参数Rasch测量模型的扩展。分析中涉及的所有方面(考试委员会的严重性、科目难度和小组表现)都位于一个共同的潜在线性量表上。结果显示,在评级过程中存在很大的不一致,在大学内部和大学之间,许多学科的严重程度都存在差异。这项研究可以作为反思性辩论的起点,讨论是否需要采用更好的标准来确保西班牙考试标准的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Consistency Analysis of Assessment Boards in University Entrance Examinations in Spain.

Consistency Analysis of Assessment Boards in University Entrance Examinations in Spain.

University entrance examinations (EBAU in Spanish) are a nationwide program for assessing student achievement levels in Spain and determining access to public undergraduate degrees. Considering the need to measure the progress of rater performance, this study analyzes rating data from the June 2018 exam sitting in the Valencian Community, Spain. A total of 54 assessment boards and 3000 students from five public universities were observed. The Many-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM) was used as an extension of the one-parameter Rasch measurement model. All facets involved in analyses (examination board severity, subject difficulty, and group performance) were located on a common underlying linear scale. The results showed large inconsistencies in the rating process, with differences in the severity levels of many subjects both within and between universities. This study may serve as a starting point for a reflective debate on the need to apply better criteria for ensuring the comparability of examination standards in Spain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信