社会功能与大学生参与指标的关系。

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Marco Turi, Rocco Servidio, Giovanna Esposito, Flaviana Tenuta, Lorena Montesano, Andrea De Giacomo, Antonella Valenti, Maria Francesca Freda, Linda S Pagani, Francesco Craig
{"title":"社会功能与大学生参与指标的关系。","authors":"Marco Turi, Rocco Servidio, Giovanna Esposito, Flaviana Tenuta, Lorena Montesano, Andrea De Giacomo, Antonella Valenti, Maria Francesca Freda, Linda S Pagani, Francesco Craig","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15060099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Less socially adaptive behaviors have often been underestimated in university students, with limited research addressing their impact on academic functioning. This study aimed to identify distinct profiles of social functioning difficulties in university students and to examine their associations with academic engagement, learning difficulties, and psychological distress. A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted with 540 undergraduate university students (mean age = 23.06, SD = 6.53; 89.7% female). Participants completed standardized self-report assessments of social functioning (SRS-2), academic engagement (SAES), learning difficulties (Vinegrad Plus), and psychological distress (GAD-7, PHQ-9). Latent profile analysis (LPA), based on ASD-related traits, revealed two latent profiles: one reflecting non-social functioning difficulties (311 participants, 57.6%-Profile 1) and another reflecting social functioning difficulties (229 participants, 42.4%-Profile 2), while binomial regression analyses examined their associations with academic outcomes. Participants in Profile 2 scored significantly higher than those in Profile 1 across all SRS-2 variables-awareness, cognition, communication, motivation, and restricted interests and repetitive behavior (<i>p</i> = 0.001)-indicating greater overall functioning in these domains. Students in the Non-social functioning difficulties profile showed higher levels of academic engagement in all areas. In contrast, students in the Social functioning difficulties profile experienced more self-reported learning challenges (<i>p</i> = 0.001), anxiety (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and depression (<i>p</i> = 0.001), underscoring the significant differences in social, academic, and emotional outcomes between the two profiles. These findings underscore the impact of vulnerability to social functioning difficulties on academic engagement, highlighting the need for tailored support systems within higher education settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations Between Social Functioning and Indicators of University Student Engagement.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Turi, Rocco Servidio, Giovanna Esposito, Flaviana Tenuta, Lorena Montesano, Andrea De Giacomo, Antonella Valenti, Maria Francesca Freda, Linda S Pagani, Francesco Craig\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ejihpe15060099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Less socially adaptive behaviors have often been underestimated in university students, with limited research addressing their impact on academic functioning. This study aimed to identify distinct profiles of social functioning difficulties in university students and to examine their associations with academic engagement, learning difficulties, and psychological distress. A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted with 540 undergraduate university students (mean age = 23.06, SD = 6.53; 89.7% female). Participants completed standardized self-report assessments of social functioning (SRS-2), academic engagement (SAES), learning difficulties (Vinegrad Plus), and psychological distress (GAD-7, PHQ-9). Latent profile analysis (LPA), based on ASD-related traits, revealed two latent profiles: one reflecting non-social functioning difficulties (311 participants, 57.6%-Profile 1) and another reflecting social functioning difficulties (229 participants, 42.4%-Profile 2), while binomial regression analyses examined their associations with academic outcomes. Participants in Profile 2 scored significantly higher than those in Profile 1 across all SRS-2 variables-awareness, cognition, communication, motivation, and restricted interests and repetitive behavior (<i>p</i> = 0.001)-indicating greater overall functioning in these domains. Students in the Non-social functioning difficulties profile showed higher levels of academic engagement in all areas. In contrast, students in the Social functioning difficulties profile experienced more self-reported learning challenges (<i>p</i> = 0.001), anxiety (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and depression (<i>p</i> = 0.001), underscoring the significant differences in social, academic, and emotional outcomes between the two profiles. These findings underscore the impact of vulnerability to social functioning difficulties on academic engagement, highlighting the need for tailored support systems within higher education settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191958/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15060099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15060099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大学生中,社会适应性较差的行为往往被低估了,关于其对学业功能影响的研究也很有限。本研究旨在确定大学生社会功能障碍的不同特征,并研究其与学业投入、学习困难和心理困扰的关系。采用基于网络的横断面调查方法,对540名大学生(平均年龄23.06岁,SD = 6.53;89.7%的女性)。参与者完成了社会功能(SRS-2)、学术参与(SAES)、学习困难(Vinegrad Plus)和心理困扰(GAD-7, PHQ-9)的标准化自我报告评估。基于asd相关特征的潜在特征分析(LPA)揭示了两种潜在特征:一种反映非社会功能困难(311人,57.6%-特征1),另一种反映社会功能困难(229人,42.4%-特征2),二项回归分析了它们与学业成绩的关系。在所有的SRS-2变量——意识、认知、沟通、动机、有限兴趣和重复行为(p = 0.001)上,档案2的参与者得分明显高于档案1的参与者,这表明这些领域的整体功能更强。非社会功能障碍组的学生在所有领域都表现出更高的学术投入水平。相比之下,社会功能障碍的学生经历了更多的自我报告的学习挑战(p = 0.001)、焦虑(p = 0.001)和抑郁(p = 0.001),强调了两种情况在社会、学业和情感结果上的显著差异。这些发现强调了社会功能障碍的脆弱性对学术参与的影响,强调了高等教育环境中量身定制支持系统的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Associations Between Social Functioning and Indicators of University Student Engagement.

Associations Between Social Functioning and Indicators of University Student Engagement.

Less socially adaptive behaviors have often been underestimated in university students, with limited research addressing their impact on academic functioning. This study aimed to identify distinct profiles of social functioning difficulties in university students and to examine their associations with academic engagement, learning difficulties, and psychological distress. A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted with 540 undergraduate university students (mean age = 23.06, SD = 6.53; 89.7% female). Participants completed standardized self-report assessments of social functioning (SRS-2), academic engagement (SAES), learning difficulties (Vinegrad Plus), and psychological distress (GAD-7, PHQ-9). Latent profile analysis (LPA), based on ASD-related traits, revealed two latent profiles: one reflecting non-social functioning difficulties (311 participants, 57.6%-Profile 1) and another reflecting social functioning difficulties (229 participants, 42.4%-Profile 2), while binomial regression analyses examined their associations with academic outcomes. Participants in Profile 2 scored significantly higher than those in Profile 1 across all SRS-2 variables-awareness, cognition, communication, motivation, and restricted interests and repetitive behavior (p = 0.001)-indicating greater overall functioning in these domains. Students in the Non-social functioning difficulties profile showed higher levels of academic engagement in all areas. In contrast, students in the Social functioning difficulties profile experienced more self-reported learning challenges (p = 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.001), and depression (p = 0.001), underscoring the significant differences in social, academic, and emotional outcomes between the two profiles. These findings underscore the impact of vulnerability to social functioning difficulties on academic engagement, highlighting the need for tailored support systems within higher education settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信