Haixin Liu, Jinxia Wang, Siyuan Zhou, Xinqi Zhou, Hong Li, Haoran Dou, Yi Lei
{"title":"特质焦虑对趋避冲突决策计算机制的影响。","authors":"Haixin Liu, Jinxia Wang, Siyuan Zhou, Xinqi Zhou, Hong Li, Haoran Dou, Yi Lei","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2519665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do individuals with trait anxiety perform in an approach-avoidance (ap-av) conflict situation? To answer this question, we employed computational models to explore the effect of trait anxiety on decisions in ap-av conflict situations and uncover the computational mechanism involved in resolving such conflicts. Sixty-seven participants with high or low trait anxiety completed the ap-av conflict task, which was analysed using the hierarchical drift-diffusion model (HDDM). Anxiety levels were assessed during both baseline and six-month follow-up sessions. Results showed that, during ap-av conflict decision-making, the reaction time of the high trait anxiety group was slower than that of the low trait anxiety group. The slower reaction time in the high trait anxiety group was due to a longer non-decision time. However, the intercept of drift rate and the effect of reward and aversion on drift rate significantly increased in the high trait anxiety group compared to the low trait anxiety group. The high trait anxiety group had a starting point closer to avoidance decisions. This study provides evidence that individuals with high and low trait anxiety manifest distinct alterations in the underlying computational decision-making processes during ap-av conflict situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of trait anxiety on computational mechanism of approach-avoidance conflict decision.\",\"authors\":\"Haixin Liu, Jinxia Wang, Siyuan Zhou, Xinqi Zhou, Hong Li, Haoran Dou, Yi Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699931.2025.2519665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How do individuals with trait anxiety perform in an approach-avoidance (ap-av) conflict situation? To answer this question, we employed computational models to explore the effect of trait anxiety on decisions in ap-av conflict situations and uncover the computational mechanism involved in resolving such conflicts. Sixty-seven participants with high or low trait anxiety completed the ap-av conflict task, which was analysed using the hierarchical drift-diffusion model (HDDM). Anxiety levels were assessed during both baseline and six-month follow-up sessions. Results showed that, during ap-av conflict decision-making, the reaction time of the high trait anxiety group was slower than that of the low trait anxiety group. The slower reaction time in the high trait anxiety group was due to a longer non-decision time. However, the intercept of drift rate and the effect of reward and aversion on drift rate significantly increased in the high trait anxiety group compared to the low trait anxiety group. The high trait anxiety group had a starting point closer to avoidance decisions. This study provides evidence that individuals with high and low trait anxiety manifest distinct alterations in the underlying computational decision-making processes during ap-av conflict situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2519665\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2519665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of trait anxiety on computational mechanism of approach-avoidance conflict decision.
How do individuals with trait anxiety perform in an approach-avoidance (ap-av) conflict situation? To answer this question, we employed computational models to explore the effect of trait anxiety on decisions in ap-av conflict situations and uncover the computational mechanism involved in resolving such conflicts. Sixty-seven participants with high or low trait anxiety completed the ap-av conflict task, which was analysed using the hierarchical drift-diffusion model (HDDM). Anxiety levels were assessed during both baseline and six-month follow-up sessions. Results showed that, during ap-av conflict decision-making, the reaction time of the high trait anxiety group was slower than that of the low trait anxiety group. The slower reaction time in the high trait anxiety group was due to a longer non-decision time. However, the intercept of drift rate and the effect of reward and aversion on drift rate significantly increased in the high trait anxiety group compared to the low trait anxiety group. The high trait anxiety group had a starting point closer to avoidance decisions. This study provides evidence that individuals with high and low trait anxiety manifest distinct alterations in the underlying computational decision-making processes during ap-av conflict situations.
期刊介绍:
Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.