特质焦虑对趋避冲突决策计算机制的影响。

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Haixin Liu, Jinxia Wang, Siyuan Zhou, Xinqi Zhou, Hong Li, Haoran Dou, Yi Lei
{"title":"特质焦虑对趋避冲突决策计算机制的影响。","authors":"Haixin Liu, Jinxia Wang, Siyuan Zhou, Xinqi Zhou, Hong Li, Haoran Dou, Yi Lei","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2519665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do individuals with trait anxiety perform in an approach-avoidance (ap-av) conflict situation? To answer this question, we employed computational models to explore the effect of trait anxiety on decisions in ap-av conflict situations and uncover the computational mechanism involved in resolving such conflicts. Sixty-seven participants with high or low trait anxiety completed the ap-av conflict task, which was analysed using the hierarchical drift-diffusion model (HDDM). Anxiety levels were assessed during both baseline and six-month follow-up sessions. Results showed that, during ap-av conflict decision-making, the reaction time of the high trait anxiety group was slower than that of the low trait anxiety group. The slower reaction time in the high trait anxiety group was due to a longer non-decision time. However, the intercept of drift rate and the effect of reward and aversion on drift rate significantly increased in the high trait anxiety group compared to the low trait anxiety group. The high trait anxiety group had a starting point closer to avoidance decisions. This study provides evidence that individuals with high and low trait anxiety manifest distinct alterations in the underlying computational decision-making processes during ap-av conflict situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of trait anxiety on computational mechanism of approach-avoidance conflict decision.\",\"authors\":\"Haixin Liu, Jinxia Wang, Siyuan Zhou, Xinqi Zhou, Hong Li, Haoran Dou, Yi Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699931.2025.2519665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How do individuals with trait anxiety perform in an approach-avoidance (ap-av) conflict situation? To answer this question, we employed computational models to explore the effect of trait anxiety on decisions in ap-av conflict situations and uncover the computational mechanism involved in resolving such conflicts. Sixty-seven participants with high or low trait anxiety completed the ap-av conflict task, which was analysed using the hierarchical drift-diffusion model (HDDM). Anxiety levels were assessed during both baseline and six-month follow-up sessions. Results showed that, during ap-av conflict decision-making, the reaction time of the high trait anxiety group was slower than that of the low trait anxiety group. The slower reaction time in the high trait anxiety group was due to a longer non-decision time. However, the intercept of drift rate and the effect of reward and aversion on drift rate significantly increased in the high trait anxiety group compared to the low trait anxiety group. The high trait anxiety group had a starting point closer to avoidance decisions. This study provides evidence that individuals with high and low trait anxiety manifest distinct alterations in the underlying computational decision-making processes during ap-av conflict situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2519665\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2519665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特质焦虑个体在接近-回避(ap-av)冲突情境中表现如何?为了回答这个问题,我们采用计算模型来探讨特质焦虑对ap-av冲突情境下决策的影响,并揭示解决此类冲突的计算机制。67名高特质焦虑或低特质焦虑的参与者完成了ap-av冲突任务,使用分层漂移-扩散模型(HDDM)对其进行分析。在基线和六个月的随访期间评估焦虑水平。结果表明,在ap-av冲突决策过程中,高特质焦虑组的反应时间比低特质焦虑组慢。高特质焦虑组的反应时间较慢是由于非决策时间较长。而高特质焦虑组的漂移率截距和奖励厌恶对漂移率的影响显著高于低特质焦虑组。高特质焦虑组的起点更接近于回避决策。本研究提供了证据,证明高、低特质焦虑个体在ap-av冲突情境下的潜在计算决策过程表现出明显的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of trait anxiety on computational mechanism of approach-avoidance conflict decision.

How do individuals with trait anxiety perform in an approach-avoidance (ap-av) conflict situation? To answer this question, we employed computational models to explore the effect of trait anxiety on decisions in ap-av conflict situations and uncover the computational mechanism involved in resolving such conflicts. Sixty-seven participants with high or low trait anxiety completed the ap-av conflict task, which was analysed using the hierarchical drift-diffusion model (HDDM). Anxiety levels were assessed during both baseline and six-month follow-up sessions. Results showed that, during ap-av conflict decision-making, the reaction time of the high trait anxiety group was slower than that of the low trait anxiety group. The slower reaction time in the high trait anxiety group was due to a longer non-decision time. However, the intercept of drift rate and the effect of reward and aversion on drift rate significantly increased in the high trait anxiety group compared to the low trait anxiety group. The high trait anxiety group had a starting point closer to avoidance decisions. This study provides evidence that individuals with high and low trait anxiety manifest distinct alterations in the underlying computational decision-making processes during ap-av conflict situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信