{"title":"认知负荷在学习中的神经关联:图形理解的fMRI研究","authors":"Erol Ozcelik","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cognitive load theory suggests that excessive demands on the human cognitive system can lead to cognitive overload and impaired learning. However, whilst the neural correlates of cognitive load are unclear, neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may help provide answers to these questions.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Considering this potential, this study aims to investigate which brain structures are associated with cognitive load through conducting an fMRI study on graph comprehension.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>The study's sample consists of 15 undergraduate students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Based on a within-subjects design, participants answered comprehension questions using split (i.e., high cognitive load) and integrated (i.e., low cognitive load) graphs whilst undergoing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants exhibited lower levels of accuracy and slower reaction times with split graphs compared to integrated graphs. The fMRI data showed that cognitive load was associated with the frontoparietal network. More specifically, the multiple demand network revealed greater activation in graphs with higher cognitive load than those of lower cognitive load.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings may indicate that a domain-general attentional brain network is responsible for cognitive load.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The neural correlates of cognitive load in learning: An fMRI study on graph comprehension\",\"authors\":\"Erol Ozcelik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cognitive load theory suggests that excessive demands on the human cognitive system can lead to cognitive overload and impaired learning. However, whilst the neural correlates of cognitive load are unclear, neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may help provide answers to these questions.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Considering this potential, this study aims to investigate which brain structures are associated with cognitive load through conducting an fMRI study on graph comprehension.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>The study's sample consists of 15 undergraduate students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Based on a within-subjects design, participants answered comprehension questions using split (i.e., high cognitive load) and integrated (i.e., low cognitive load) graphs whilst undergoing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants exhibited lower levels of accuracy and slower reaction times with split graphs compared to integrated graphs. The fMRI data showed that cognitive load was associated with the frontoparietal network. More specifically, the multiple demand network revealed greater activation in graphs with higher cognitive load than those of lower cognitive load.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings may indicate that a domain-general attentional brain network is responsible for cognitive load.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000994\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The neural correlates of cognitive load in learning: An fMRI study on graph comprehension
Background
Cognitive load theory suggests that excessive demands on the human cognitive system can lead to cognitive overload and impaired learning. However, whilst the neural correlates of cognitive load are unclear, neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may help provide answers to these questions.
Aims
Considering this potential, this study aims to investigate which brain structures are associated with cognitive load through conducting an fMRI study on graph comprehension.
Sample
The study's sample consists of 15 undergraduate students.
Methods
Based on a within-subjects design, participants answered comprehension questions using split (i.e., high cognitive load) and integrated (i.e., low cognitive load) graphs whilst undergoing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.
Results
Participants exhibited lower levels of accuracy and slower reaction times with split graphs compared to integrated graphs. The fMRI data showed that cognitive load was associated with the frontoparietal network. More specifically, the multiple demand network revealed greater activation in graphs with higher cognitive load than those of lower cognitive load.
Conclusions
These findings may indicate that a domain-general attentional brain network is responsible for cognitive load.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.