Li Xiaohua, Du Yiting, Li Qin, Zhai Yang, Wu Shumao, Peng Li, Pan Yi, Chen Lingmei, Liao Wenge, Li Maoxia
{"title":"GG乳杆菌和其他益生菌在儿童食物过敏治疗中的应用:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Li Xiaohua, Du Yiting, Li Qin, Zhai Yang, Wu Shumao, Peng Li, Pan Yi, Chen Lingmei, Liao Wenge, Li Maoxia","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2025.1565436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food allergies are a significant health challenge in children, impacting quality of life and posing a burden on healthcare systems. Probiotics have been proposed as a potential treatment for food allergies, but their efficacy remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of different probiotics in managing pediatric food allergies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline up to March 5, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating probiotics for pediatric food allergies were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. Network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for different probiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen RCTs involving 1,502 participants aged 1 month to 10 years were included. Eight probiotic interventions were analyzed. Lactobacillus GG (LGG) was identified as the most effective in reducing Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) scores (SMD = -4.24, 95% CI [-7.12, -1.36]; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and improving quality of life. For IgE regulation, <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> (LB) demonstrated the greatest efficacy (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Publication bias was minimal for SCORAD and IgE outcomes, but some bias was detected for quality of life due to the limited number of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that LGG is the most effective probiotic for improving clinical outcomes in pediatric food allergy management, particularly for SCORAD scores and quality of life. However, further high-quality RCTs are needed to validate these findings and explore the mechanisms underlying the differential efficacy of probiotic strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"12 ","pages":"1565436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lactobacillus GG and other probiotics in pediatric food allergy treatment: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Li Xiaohua, Du Yiting, Li Qin, Zhai Yang, Wu Shumao, Peng Li, Pan Yi, Chen Lingmei, Liao Wenge, Li Maoxia\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnut.2025.1565436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food allergies are a significant health challenge in children, impacting quality of life and posing a burden on healthcare systems. Probiotics have been proposed as a potential treatment for food allergies, but their efficacy remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of different probiotics in managing pediatric food allergies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline up to March 5, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating probiotics for pediatric food allergies were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. Network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for different probiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen RCTs involving 1,502 participants aged 1 month to 10 years were included. Eight probiotic interventions were analyzed. Lactobacillus GG (LGG) was identified as the most effective in reducing Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) scores (SMD = -4.24, 95% CI [-7.12, -1.36]; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and improving quality of life. For IgE regulation, <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> (LB) demonstrated the greatest efficacy (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Publication bias was minimal for SCORAD and IgE outcomes, but some bias was detected for quality of life due to the limited number of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that LGG is the most effective probiotic for improving clinical outcomes in pediatric food allergy management, particularly for SCORAD scores and quality of life. However, further high-quality RCTs are needed to validate these findings and explore the mechanisms underlying the differential efficacy of probiotic strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1565436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172551/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1565436\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1565436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:食物过敏是儿童面临的重大健康挑战,影响生活质量并给医疗保健系统带来负担。益生菌已被提出作为食物过敏的潜在治疗方法,但其功效仍存在争议。本系统综述和网络荟萃分析旨在评估不同益生菌在治疗儿童食物过敏方面的比较效果。方法:根据Cochrane手册和PRISMA指南,系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Medline,检索时间截止到2024年3月5日。包括评估益生菌治疗儿童食物过敏的随机对照试验(rct)。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行质量评价。采用随机效应模型进行网络荟萃分析,计算不同益生菌的标准化平均差异(SMDs)、优势比(ORs)和累积排名曲线下表面(SUCRA)。结果:纳入16项随机对照试验,涉及1,502名参与者,年龄为1 个月至10 岁。分析了8种益生菌干预措施。乳酸菌GG (LGG)对降低评分性特应性皮炎(SCORAD)评分最有效(SMD = -4.24,95% CI [-7.12, -1.36];p 嗜酸乳杆菌(LB)表现出最大的疗效(p )结论:本研究表明,LGG是改善儿童食物过敏管理临床结果最有效的益生菌,特别是在SCORAD评分和生活质量方面。然而,需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验来验证这些发现,并探索益生菌菌株差异功效的机制。
Lactobacillus GG and other probiotics in pediatric food allergy treatment: a network meta-analysis.
Background: Food allergies are a significant health challenge in children, impacting quality of life and posing a burden on healthcare systems. Probiotics have been proposed as a potential treatment for food allergies, but their efficacy remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of different probiotics in managing pediatric food allergies.
Methods: Following the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline up to March 5, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating probiotics for pediatric food allergies were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. Network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for different probiotics.
Results: Sixteen RCTs involving 1,502 participants aged 1 month to 10 years were included. Eight probiotic interventions were analyzed. Lactobacillus GG (LGG) was identified as the most effective in reducing Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) scores (SMD = -4.24, 95% CI [-7.12, -1.36]; p < 0.05) and improving quality of life. For IgE regulation, Lactobacillus acidophilus (LB) demonstrated the greatest efficacy (p < 0.05). Publication bias was minimal for SCORAD and IgE outcomes, but some bias was detected for quality of life due to the limited number of studies.
Conclusion: This study suggests that LGG is the most effective probiotic for improving clinical outcomes in pediatric food allergy management, particularly for SCORAD scores and quality of life. However, further high-quality RCTs are needed to validate these findings and explore the mechanisms underlying the differential efficacy of probiotic strains.
期刊介绍:
No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health.
Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.