人工智能驱动的洞察:农药残留文献中方法验证的程度分析

IF 6.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Leah S. Riter*, Steven J. Lehotay and John Swarthout, 
{"title":"人工智能驱动的洞察:农药残留文献中方法验证的程度分析","authors":"Leah S. Riter*,&nbsp;Steven J. Lehotay and John Swarthout,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.5c0457410.1021/acs.jafc.5c04574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Validation of analytical methods to assess figures of merit and other key performance parameters is a fundamental requirement within the fitness-for-purpose concept. By combining generative AI and subject matter review, this perspective article provides insights into analytical trends, technological advancements, and the current state of analytical reporting with respect to validation of published pesticide residue methods involving mass spectrometry in agricultural applications. Reporting trends of analytical parameters and technological advancements were evaluated across a data set of 391 studies published in the <i>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</i> from 1970 to 2024. This feasibility study demonstrated that with properly optimized prompts and performance verification, AI can efficiently and accurately evaluate scientific literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":"73 24","pages":"14776–14782 14776–14782"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c04574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights Powered by Artificial Intelligence: Analyzing the Extent of Method Validation in Pesticide Residue Literature\",\"authors\":\"Leah S. Riter*,&nbsp;Steven J. Lehotay and John Swarthout,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jafc.5c0457410.1021/acs.jafc.5c04574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Validation of analytical methods to assess figures of merit and other key performance parameters is a fundamental requirement within the fitness-for-purpose concept. By combining generative AI and subject matter review, this perspective article provides insights into analytical trends, technological advancements, and the current state of analytical reporting with respect to validation of published pesticide residue methods involving mass spectrometry in agricultural applications. Reporting trends of analytical parameters and technological advancements were evaluated across a data set of 391 studies published in the <i>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</i> from 1970 to 2024. This feasibility study demonstrated that with properly optimized prompts and performance verification, AI can efficiently and accurately evaluate scientific literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"73 24\",\"pages\":\"14776–14782 14776–14782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c04574\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c04574\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c04574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

验证分析方法以评估价值数字和其他关键绩效参数是适用性概念中的基本要求。通过结合生成式人工智能和主题审查,这篇观点文章提供了分析趋势、技术进步和分析报告的现状,这些分析报告涉及农业应用中涉及质谱的农药残留方法的验证。分析参数和技术进步的报告趋势是根据1970年至2024年发表在《农业与食品化学杂志》上的391项研究的数据集进行评估的。该可行性研究表明,通过适当优化提示和性能验证,人工智能可以高效准确地评估科学文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights Powered by Artificial Intelligence: Analyzing the Extent of Method Validation in Pesticide Residue Literature

Validation of analytical methods to assess figures of merit and other key performance parameters is a fundamental requirement within the fitness-for-purpose concept. By combining generative AI and subject matter review, this perspective article provides insights into analytical trends, technological advancements, and the current state of analytical reporting with respect to validation of published pesticide residue methods involving mass spectrometry in agricultural applications. Reporting trends of analytical parameters and technological advancements were evaluated across a data set of 391 studies published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry from 1970 to 2024. This feasibility study demonstrated that with properly optimized prompts and performance verification, AI can efficiently and accurately evaluate scientific literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
8.20%
发文量
1375
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry publishes high-quality, cutting edge original research representing complete studies and research advances dealing with the chemistry and biochemistry of agriculture and food. The Journal also encourages papers with chemistry and/or biochemistry as a major component combined with biological/sensory/nutritional/toxicological evaluation related to agriculture and/or food.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信