R Branco-Lopes, C Winder, M E Canozzi, Y S A Lopez, B Schmitz, N Silva-Del-Río
{"title":"添加益生菌对犊牛生长性能和采食量的影响:meta分析。","authors":"R Branco-Lopes, C Winder, M E Canozzi, Y S A Lopez, B Schmitz, N Silva-Del-Río","doi":"10.3168/jds.2025-26540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of probiotic supplementation on ADG, feed intake, and feed efficiency (FE) of dairy calves. A secondary objective was to assess outcomes stratified by probiotic type. Our study included quasirandomized and randomized controlled trials written in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that assessed the effects of probiotic supplementation on the growth of dairy calves. No restrictions were placed on the publication year. A total of 5,480 records were initially identified after conducting searches in Biosis, CAB Abstracts, Medline, Scopus, and the Dissertations and Theses Database. After applying inclusion criteria, 55 studies (56 trials) were included in the analysis. Multilevel random-effects models were fitted for a single dataset combining all trials regardless of probiotic type and for 4 datasets stratified by 4 probiotic types (Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces, and multiple genera probiotics). Meta-analyses showed that probiotic supplementation did not result in significant difference in FE compared with the control group (no treatment or placebo). Probiotic supplementation improved total DMI, starter intake, and ADG and tended to decrease milk intake. A meta-regression analysis indicated a significant association between starter intake and probiotic type and the duration of probiotic supplementation. Analyses by probiotic type revealed no significant effects on DMI or FE for Lactobacillus spp., Saccharomyces spp., or multiple genera probiotics, whereas Bacillus spp. showed no effect on DMI but a tendency to improve FE. Supplementation with Lactobacillus spp. and multiple genera probiotics tended to increase starter intake. Supplementation with Bacillus spp. and Lactobacillus spp. increased the ADG of calves, whereas Saccharomyces spp. and multiple genera probiotic supplementation did not yield significant differences. Substantial and significant heterogeneity was observed for most outcomes; thus, results must be interpreted carefully. Probiotics may be beneficial for enhancing DMI, starter intake, and ADG in dairy calves; however, current evidence remains limited due to high heterogeneity. Results of analyses by probiotic type should be interpreted carefully due to the limited number of studies per category. To develop appropriate recommendations, additional research is required to address the sources of heterogeneity in existing studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of probiotic supplementation on growth performance and feed intake of dairy calves: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"R Branco-Lopes, C Winder, M E Canozzi, Y S A Lopez, B Schmitz, N Silva-Del-Río\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jds.2025-26540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of probiotic supplementation on ADG, feed intake, and feed efficiency (FE) of dairy calves. A secondary objective was to assess outcomes stratified by probiotic type. Our study included quasirandomized and randomized controlled trials written in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that assessed the effects of probiotic supplementation on the growth of dairy calves. No restrictions were placed on the publication year. A total of 5,480 records were initially identified after conducting searches in Biosis, CAB Abstracts, Medline, Scopus, and the Dissertations and Theses Database. After applying inclusion criteria, 55 studies (56 trials) were included in the analysis. Multilevel random-effects models were fitted for a single dataset combining all trials regardless of probiotic type and for 4 datasets stratified by 4 probiotic types (Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces, and multiple genera probiotics). Meta-analyses showed that probiotic supplementation did not result in significant difference in FE compared with the control group (no treatment or placebo). Probiotic supplementation improved total DMI, starter intake, and ADG and tended to decrease milk intake. A meta-regression analysis indicated a significant association between starter intake and probiotic type and the duration of probiotic supplementation. Analyses by probiotic type revealed no significant effects on DMI or FE for Lactobacillus spp., Saccharomyces spp., or multiple genera probiotics, whereas Bacillus spp. showed no effect on DMI but a tendency to improve FE. Supplementation with Lactobacillus spp. and multiple genera probiotics tended to increase starter intake. Supplementation with Bacillus spp. and Lactobacillus spp. increased the ADG of calves, whereas Saccharomyces spp. and multiple genera probiotic supplementation did not yield significant differences. Substantial and significant heterogeneity was observed for most outcomes; thus, results must be interpreted carefully. Probiotics may be beneficial for enhancing DMI, starter intake, and ADG in dairy calves; however, current evidence remains limited due to high heterogeneity. Results of analyses by probiotic type should be interpreted carefully due to the limited number of studies per category. To develop appropriate recommendations, additional research is required to address the sources of heterogeneity in existing studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26540\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26540","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估益生菌添加对犊牛日增重、采食量和饲料效率的影响。第二个目的是评估按益生菌类型分层的结果。我们的研究包括用英语、西班牙语或葡萄牙语撰写的准随机和随机对照试验,以评估益生菌补充剂对奶牛生长的影响。对出版年份没有任何限制。在Biosis、CAB Abstracts、Medline、Scopus和dissertation and thesis Database中进行检索后,初步确定了5,480条记录。应用纳入标准后,55项研究(56项试验)被纳入分析。对包含所有试验的单一数据集(不考虑益生菌类型)和按4种益生菌类型(芽孢杆菌、乳酸菌、酵母菌和多属益生菌)分层的4个数据集进行多水平随机效应模型拟合。荟萃分析显示,与对照组(未治疗或安慰剂组)相比,补充益生菌并没有导致FE的显著差异。补充益生菌可提高总DMI、起始饲料摄入量和平均日增重,并有降低牛奶摄入量的趋势。荟萃回归分析表明,益生菌的起始摄入量与益生菌类型和益生菌补充时间之间存在显著关联。益生菌类型分析显示,乳酸菌、酵母菌或多属益生菌对DMI和FE没有显著影响,而芽孢杆菌对DMI没有影响,但有提高FE的趋势。添加乳酸杆菌和多种益生菌倾向于增加发酵剂的摄入量。添加芽孢杆菌和乳酸菌可提高犊牛日增重,而添加酵母菌和多属益生菌对犊牛日增重无显著影响。在大多数结果中观察到大量和显著的异质性;因此,必须仔细解释结果。益生菌可能有利于提高奶牛DMI、起始日采食量和平均日增重;然而,由于异质性高,目前的证据仍然有限。由于每个类别的研究数量有限,因此应仔细解释益生菌类型分析的结果。为了提出适当的建议,需要进行更多的研究,以解决现有研究中异质性的来源。
Effects of probiotic supplementation on growth performance and feed intake of dairy calves: A meta-analysis.
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of probiotic supplementation on ADG, feed intake, and feed efficiency (FE) of dairy calves. A secondary objective was to assess outcomes stratified by probiotic type. Our study included quasirandomized and randomized controlled trials written in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that assessed the effects of probiotic supplementation on the growth of dairy calves. No restrictions were placed on the publication year. A total of 5,480 records were initially identified after conducting searches in Biosis, CAB Abstracts, Medline, Scopus, and the Dissertations and Theses Database. After applying inclusion criteria, 55 studies (56 trials) were included in the analysis. Multilevel random-effects models were fitted for a single dataset combining all trials regardless of probiotic type and for 4 datasets stratified by 4 probiotic types (Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces, and multiple genera probiotics). Meta-analyses showed that probiotic supplementation did not result in significant difference in FE compared with the control group (no treatment or placebo). Probiotic supplementation improved total DMI, starter intake, and ADG and tended to decrease milk intake. A meta-regression analysis indicated a significant association between starter intake and probiotic type and the duration of probiotic supplementation. Analyses by probiotic type revealed no significant effects on DMI or FE for Lactobacillus spp., Saccharomyces spp., or multiple genera probiotics, whereas Bacillus spp. showed no effect on DMI but a tendency to improve FE. Supplementation with Lactobacillus spp. and multiple genera probiotics tended to increase starter intake. Supplementation with Bacillus spp. and Lactobacillus spp. increased the ADG of calves, whereas Saccharomyces spp. and multiple genera probiotic supplementation did not yield significant differences. Substantial and significant heterogeneity was observed for most outcomes; thus, results must be interpreted carefully. Probiotics may be beneficial for enhancing DMI, starter intake, and ADG in dairy calves; however, current evidence remains limited due to high heterogeneity. Results of analyses by probiotic type should be interpreted carefully due to the limited number of studies per category. To develop appropriate recommendations, additional research is required to address the sources of heterogeneity in existing studies.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.