在集体照料中支助智力残疾者的经验的人权框架:大流行后的思考。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jo Watson, Elena Jenkin, Kate Anderson, Amie O'Shea, Kevin Murfitt, Jennifer David, Susan Taylor, Gemma Ge, Patsie Frawley, Angela Dew
{"title":"在集体照料中支助智力残疾者的经验的人权框架:大流行后的思考。","authors":"Jo Watson, Elena Jenkin, Kate Anderson, Amie O'Shea, Kevin Murfitt, Jennifer David, Susan Taylor, Gemma Ge, Patsie Frawley, Angela Dew","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2025.2513336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored human rights concerns of advocates and service providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in residential support services in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A desk-top review informed the content of individual interviews and focus groups with Victorian disability service providers and key advocacy focused agencies with roles in complaint, community visitor, guardianship, or advocacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concerns identified by both stakeholder groups included restricted access to choice, control, and decision making, barriers to communication and self-determination, reduced safeguarding, and a lack of accessible health information. Enablers included increased face to face contact with consistent support staff, and opportunities for increased engagement with friends and family online. Reductions in behaviours of concern and associated restrictive interventions were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prevention of human rights violations in the context of lockdowns due to disease outbreaks or other disasters can and should be a priority for public health policy in Australia and internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A human rights framing of the experiences of supporting people with intellectual disability in congregate care: Post-pandemic reflections.\",\"authors\":\"Jo Watson, Elena Jenkin, Kate Anderson, Amie O'Shea, Kevin Murfitt, Jennifer David, Susan Taylor, Gemma Ge, Patsie Frawley, Angela Dew\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/13668250.2025.2513336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored human rights concerns of advocates and service providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in residential support services in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A desk-top review informed the content of individual interviews and focus groups with Victorian disability service providers and key advocacy focused agencies with roles in complaint, community visitor, guardianship, or advocacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concerns identified by both stakeholder groups included restricted access to choice, control, and decision making, barriers to communication and self-determination, reduced safeguarding, and a lack of accessible health information. Enablers included increased face to face contact with consistent support staff, and opportunities for increased engagement with friends and family online. Reductions in behaviours of concern and associated restrictive interventions were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prevention of human rights violations in the context of lockdowns due to disease outbreaks or other disasters can and should be a priority for public health policy in Australia and internationally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2025.2513336\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2025.2513336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究探讨了新冠肺炎大流行期间澳大利亚维多利亚州住宅支持服务倡导者和服务提供者的人权问题。方法:采用桌面回顾的方法,对维多利亚州残疾服务提供者和主要倡导机构进行个人访谈和焦点小组,这些机构在投诉、社区探访、监护或倡导方面发挥作用。结果:两个利益相关者群体确定的关注问题包括选择、控制和决策的机会受限,沟通和自决障碍,保障减少以及缺乏可获得的健康信息。促进因素包括增加与支持人员的面对面接触,以及增加与朋友和家人在线接触的机会。据报告,令人关切的行为和相关的限制性干预措施有所减少。结论:在因疾病爆发或其他灾害而封锁的情况下,预防侵犯人权行为可以而且应该成为澳大利亚和国际公共卫生政策的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A human rights framing of the experiences of supporting people with intellectual disability in congregate care: Post-pandemic reflections.

Background: This study explored human rights concerns of advocates and service providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in residential support services in Victoria, Australia.

Method: A desk-top review informed the content of individual interviews and focus groups with Victorian disability service providers and key advocacy focused agencies with roles in complaint, community visitor, guardianship, or advocacy.

Results: Concerns identified by both stakeholder groups included restricted access to choice, control, and decision making, barriers to communication and self-determination, reduced safeguarding, and a lack of accessible health information. Enablers included increased face to face contact with consistent support staff, and opportunities for increased engagement with friends and family online. Reductions in behaviours of concern and associated restrictive interventions were reported.

Conclusion: Prevention of human rights violations in the context of lockdowns due to disease outbreaks or other disasters can and should be a priority for public health policy in Australia and internationally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信