玻璃体内地塞米松植入治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的安全性:对现实世界研究的系统回顾。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2025-06-12 DOI:10.1159/000545987
Giuseppe Querques, Michele Figus, Maddalena De Bernardo, Mario Damiano Toro, Magda Gharbiya, Valentina Gallinaro, Elena Strina, Vittorio Cacace, Massimo Nicolò
{"title":"玻璃体内地塞米松植入治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的安全性:对现实世界研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Giuseppe Querques, Michele Figus, Maddalena De Bernardo, Mario Damiano Toro, Magda Gharbiya, Valentina Gallinaro, Elena Strina, Vittorio Cacace, Massimo Nicolò","doi":"10.1159/000545987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With increasing experience using intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-i), it has become a first-line therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), due mainly to its good efficacy profile. However, this treatment is not devoid of adverse events, which are predominantly transient and should be considered when administering it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review without meta-analysis adhered to the guidelines delineated in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Systematic electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies assessing the safety profile of DEX-i in patients with DME, covering the period from January 1, 2014, to March 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included Seventy-six RWE that evaluated the safety of DEX-i. Regarding intraocular pressure (IOP)-related adverse events (AEs), these AEs were very heterogeneous and have included different definitions. The incidence of IOP-related AEs varied significantly from study to study, from 2% to almost 60%. In general, the peak IOP increase was typically observed 60 days post-DEX-i injection, followed by a decrease in the subsequent months. In most patients, these IOP-related AEs were successfully and efficiently managed with topical IOP-lowering medication, although some patients required additional treatments (i.e., laser or surgery). Regarding cataract development rates, the results were conflicting, with some studies showing rates ≥40%, %, while others reported rates of 0% or less than 5%. Additionally, current evidence showed the beneficial effects of DEX-i in eyes with DME that underwent cataract surgery. Other serious ocular AEs related to DEX-i were rare, indeed, the reported-incidence-rate of endophthalmitis ranged between 0.07%-0.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the main DEX-i-related AEs were elevation of IOP and cataract. Episodes of ocular hypertension were usually transient and successfully controlled with topical treatment. Additionally, repeated treatment with DEX-i in the same eye was not associated with IOP-related AEs, but it was with cataract-related AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety profile of intravitreal Dexamethasone implant to manage diabetic macular edema: A systematic review of real-world studies.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Querques, Michele Figus, Maddalena De Bernardo, Mario Damiano Toro, Magda Gharbiya, Valentina Gallinaro, Elena Strina, Vittorio Cacace, Massimo Nicolò\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With increasing experience using intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-i), it has become a first-line therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), due mainly to its good efficacy profile. However, this treatment is not devoid of adverse events, which are predominantly transient and should be considered when administering it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review without meta-analysis adhered to the guidelines delineated in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Systematic electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies assessing the safety profile of DEX-i in patients with DME, covering the period from January 1, 2014, to March 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included Seventy-six RWE that evaluated the safety of DEX-i. Regarding intraocular pressure (IOP)-related adverse events (AEs), these AEs were very heterogeneous and have included different definitions. The incidence of IOP-related AEs varied significantly from study to study, from 2% to almost 60%. In general, the peak IOP increase was typically observed 60 days post-DEX-i injection, followed by a decrease in the subsequent months. In most patients, these IOP-related AEs were successfully and efficiently managed with topical IOP-lowering medication, although some patients required additional treatments (i.e., laser or surgery). Regarding cataract development rates, the results were conflicting, with some studies showing rates ≥40%, %, while others reported rates of 0% or less than 5%. Additionally, current evidence showed the beneficial effects of DEX-i in eyes with DME that underwent cataract surgery. Other serious ocular AEs related to DEX-i were rare, indeed, the reported-incidence-rate of endophthalmitis ranged between 0.07%-0.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the main DEX-i-related AEs were elevation of IOP and cataract. Episodes of ocular hypertension were usually transient and successfully controlled with topical treatment. Additionally, repeated treatment with DEX-i in the same eye was not associated with IOP-related AEs, but it was with cataract-related AEs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545987\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545987","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:随着玻璃体内地塞米松植入物(DEX-i)的使用经验越来越多,由于其良好的疗效,它已成为糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者的一线治疗方法。然而,这种治疗并非没有不良事件,这些不良事件主要是短暂的,在给药时应予以考虑。方法:本系统评价没有进行meta分析,遵循了系统评价和meta分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明中所描述的指南。在PubMed、Medline、Embase和谷歌Scholar数据库中进行了系统的电子检索,以确定评估DEX-i在DME患者中的安全性的真实证据(RWE)研究,涵盖2014年1月1日至2024年3月1日。结果:本综述纳入了76例评估DEX-i安全性的RWE。关于眼内压(IOP)相关不良事件(ae),这些ae是非常异构的,包括不同的定义。不同研究中与io相关的ae的发生率差异很大,从2%到近60%不等。一般来说,通常在注射dex -i后60天观察到IOP的峰值增加,随后几个月下降。在大多数患者中,尽管一些患者需要额外的治疗(即激光或手术),但通过局部降低内压的药物,这些与内压相关的ae都得到了成功和有效的控制。关于白内障的发病率,结果是相互矛盾的,一些研究显示发病率≥40%,而另一些研究报告的发病率为0%或低于5%。此外,目前的证据显示DEX-i对DME患者白内障手术的有益作用。与DEX-i相关的其他严重眼部不良事件很少见,事实上,报道的眼内炎发病率在0.07%-0.3%之间。结论:总体而言,与dex -i相关的ae主要是IOP升高和白内障。高眼压发作通常是短暂的,局部治疗可成功控制。此外,在同一只眼睛中重复使用DEX-i与眼压相关的ae无关,但与白内障相关的ae相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety profile of intravitreal Dexamethasone implant to manage diabetic macular edema: A systematic review of real-world studies.

Introduction: With increasing experience using intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-i), it has become a first-line therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), due mainly to its good efficacy profile. However, this treatment is not devoid of adverse events, which are predominantly transient and should be considered when administering it.

Methods: This systematic review without meta-analysis adhered to the guidelines delineated in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Systematic electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies assessing the safety profile of DEX-i in patients with DME, covering the period from January 1, 2014, to March 1, 2024.

Results: This review included Seventy-six RWE that evaluated the safety of DEX-i. Regarding intraocular pressure (IOP)-related adverse events (AEs), these AEs were very heterogeneous and have included different definitions. The incidence of IOP-related AEs varied significantly from study to study, from 2% to almost 60%. In general, the peak IOP increase was typically observed 60 days post-DEX-i injection, followed by a decrease in the subsequent months. In most patients, these IOP-related AEs were successfully and efficiently managed with topical IOP-lowering medication, although some patients required additional treatments (i.e., laser or surgery). Regarding cataract development rates, the results were conflicting, with some studies showing rates ≥40%, %, while others reported rates of 0% or less than 5%. Additionally, current evidence showed the beneficial effects of DEX-i in eyes with DME that underwent cataract surgery. Other serious ocular AEs related to DEX-i were rare, indeed, the reported-incidence-rate of endophthalmitis ranged between 0.07%-0.3%.

Conclusions: Overall, the main DEX-i-related AEs were elevation of IOP and cataract. Episodes of ocular hypertension were usually transient and successfully controlled with topical treatment. Additionally, repeated treatment with DEX-i in the same eye was not associated with IOP-related AEs, but it was with cataract-related AEs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信