我们应推动临床医生和受训人员参与卫生专业教育计划。

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Lea Harper, Sylvain Coderre, Kirstie Lithgow, Kenna Kelly-Turner, Melinda Davis, Kevin McLaughlin
{"title":"我们应推动临床医生和受训人员参与卫生专业教育计划。","authors":"Lea Harper, Sylvain Coderre, Kirstie Lithgow, Kenna Kelly-Turner, Melinda Davis, Kevin McLaughlin","doi":"10.1111/medu.15749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health Professional Education (HPE) programmes, such as mentorship, are widely regarded as being advantageous to the personal and professional development of clinicians and trainees. Involvement in a mentoring relationship is associated with positive outcomes for both mentees and mentors, including improved career preparation, increased career success, higher job satisfaction and reduced risk of burnout. Despite these data, a minority of trainees report having a mentor. In this Cross-Cutting Edge article, the authors focus on an impediment to participation in HPE programmes that they feel are both highly prevalent and modifiable: habit. Taking the example of mentorship, they use dual processing as their theoretical framework and describe how we use both System 1 and System 2 processing to make decisions that, in turn, promote habitual and goal-directed actions, respectively. The authors discuss the relationship between habitual and goal-directed actions and suggest that habits can both facilitate and hinder our goals. Drawing on the clinical literature on adherence to clinical practice guidelines, they describe how habits and contextual factors can interfere with clinical goals and how manipulating the clinical environment can move behaviour in the desired direction. They then branch into behavioural economics to describe the features of a nudge (and a sludge) and review the literature on the effectiveness of this type of intervention - including potential ethical concerns around the use of nudges as behavioural interventions. Using the MINDSPACE mnemonic/framework they suggest different types of transparent and non-transparent nudges that could be used to increase participation in mentorship. Recognizing that mentorship is complex and the impact of a single nudge on behaviour may be ineffective or wane over time, the authors propose a process of ongoing programme evaluation and quality improvement that could help create and maintain a culture of mentorship and that can also be applied to other HPE programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"We should nudge clinicians and trainees to participate in health professions education programmes.\",\"authors\":\"Lea Harper, Sylvain Coderre, Kirstie Lithgow, Kenna Kelly-Turner, Melinda Davis, Kevin McLaughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health Professional Education (HPE) programmes, such as mentorship, are widely regarded as being advantageous to the personal and professional development of clinicians and trainees. Involvement in a mentoring relationship is associated with positive outcomes for both mentees and mentors, including improved career preparation, increased career success, higher job satisfaction and reduced risk of burnout. Despite these data, a minority of trainees report having a mentor. In this Cross-Cutting Edge article, the authors focus on an impediment to participation in HPE programmes that they feel are both highly prevalent and modifiable: habit. Taking the example of mentorship, they use dual processing as their theoretical framework and describe how we use both System 1 and System 2 processing to make decisions that, in turn, promote habitual and goal-directed actions, respectively. The authors discuss the relationship between habitual and goal-directed actions and suggest that habits can both facilitate and hinder our goals. Drawing on the clinical literature on adherence to clinical practice guidelines, they describe how habits and contextual factors can interfere with clinical goals and how manipulating the clinical environment can move behaviour in the desired direction. They then branch into behavioural economics to describe the features of a nudge (and a sludge) and review the literature on the effectiveness of this type of intervention - including potential ethical concerns around the use of nudges as behavioural interventions. Using the MINDSPACE mnemonic/framework they suggest different types of transparent and non-transparent nudges that could be used to increase participation in mentorship. Recognizing that mentorship is complex and the impact of a single nudge on behaviour may be ineffective or wane over time, the authors propose a process of ongoing programme evaluation and quality improvement that could help create and maintain a culture of mentorship and that can also be applied to other HPE programmes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15749\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生专业教育(HPE)方案,如指导,被广泛认为有利于临床医生和受训者的个人和专业发展。参与师徒关系对师徒双方都有积极的影响,包括改善职业准备、增加职业成功、提高工作满意度和降低职业倦怠风险。尽管有这些数据,少数学员报告说他们有导师。在这篇交叉前沿的文章中,作者将重点放在了参与HPE项目的一个障碍上,他们认为这个障碍既普遍又可以改变:习惯。以师徒关系为例,他们使用双重处理作为他们的理论框架,并描述了我们如何使用系统1和系统2处理来做出决策,进而分别促进习惯和目标导向的行动。作者讨论了习惯和目标导向行为之间的关系,并指出习惯既可以促进我们的目标,也可以阻碍我们的目标。根据临床实践指南的临床文献,他们描述了习惯和环境因素如何干扰临床目标,以及如何操纵临床环境可以使行为朝着预期的方向发展。然后,他们扩展到行为经济学,描述轻推(和污泥)的特征,并回顾了有关此类干预有效性的文献——包括使用轻推作为行为干预的潜在伦理问题。使用MINDSPACE助记符/框架,他们提出了不同类型的透明和非透明的推动,可以用来增加参与指导。认识到师友关系是复杂的,一次推动对行为的影响可能会随着时间的推移而无效或减弱,作者提出了一个持续的项目评估和质量改进过程,可以帮助创建和维持师友关系文化,也可以应用于其他HPE项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
We should nudge clinicians and trainees to participate in health professions education programmes.

Health Professional Education (HPE) programmes, such as mentorship, are widely regarded as being advantageous to the personal and professional development of clinicians and trainees. Involvement in a mentoring relationship is associated with positive outcomes for both mentees and mentors, including improved career preparation, increased career success, higher job satisfaction and reduced risk of burnout. Despite these data, a minority of trainees report having a mentor. In this Cross-Cutting Edge article, the authors focus on an impediment to participation in HPE programmes that they feel are both highly prevalent and modifiable: habit. Taking the example of mentorship, they use dual processing as their theoretical framework and describe how we use both System 1 and System 2 processing to make decisions that, in turn, promote habitual and goal-directed actions, respectively. The authors discuss the relationship between habitual and goal-directed actions and suggest that habits can both facilitate and hinder our goals. Drawing on the clinical literature on adherence to clinical practice guidelines, they describe how habits and contextual factors can interfere with clinical goals and how manipulating the clinical environment can move behaviour in the desired direction. They then branch into behavioural economics to describe the features of a nudge (and a sludge) and review the literature on the effectiveness of this type of intervention - including potential ethical concerns around the use of nudges as behavioural interventions. Using the MINDSPACE mnemonic/framework they suggest different types of transparent and non-transparent nudges that could be used to increase participation in mentorship. Recognizing that mentorship is complex and the impact of a single nudge on behaviour may be ineffective or wane over time, the authors propose a process of ongoing programme evaluation and quality improvement that could help create and maintain a culture of mentorship and that can also be applied to other HPE programmes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信