智障人士和自闭症人士对专科精神病病床的利用:使用英语保证转换数据集的时间序列分析。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Atiyya Nisar, Paul A Thompson, Harm Boer, Haider Al-Delfi, Peter E Langdon
{"title":"智障人士和自闭症人士对专科精神病病床的利用:使用英语保证转换数据集的时间序列分析。","authors":"Atiyya Nisar, Paul A Thompson, Harm Boer, Haider Al-Delfi, Peter E Langdon","doi":"10.1111/jir.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using nationally available anonymised and aggregated English data, we examined specialist and nonspecialist psychiatric bed utilisation by people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data about specialist psychiatric bed utilisation from the Assuring Transformation Dataset, from March 2015 to January 2024, we applied linear regression (with moving average or autoregressive errors) to explore the relationships between a set of outcome variables (e.g., number of inpatients and length of stay) and a set of sociodemographic, clinical and service-related predictor variables (e.g., age, ethnicity, admission source, legal status, admission source, discharge destination, Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews) over time. Comparisons were made with data from the Mental Health Services Data Set about nonspecialist psychiatric bed utilisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over time, there was an average reduction of 8.07 inpatients per month. This reduction was due to a reduction in the number with a length of stay longer than 2 years, and fewer inpatients with intellectual disabilities without autism over time, rather than fewer autistic inpatients without intellectual disabilities; instead, the number of autistic inpatients increased by 6.02 per month. However, overall, there were fewer inpatients in specialist psychiatric beds than in nonspecialist beds by an average of 877 patients, and the number in specialist beds reduced faster than the number in nonspecialist beds over time. We found that more hospital spells were associated with more inpatients older than 18, more detentions under Part III of the Mental Health Act, more inpatients not known to the local authority, and an increased number of White inpatients. More admissions were associated with fewer discharges, while those with a hospital stay longer than 2 years were less likely to have had a postadmission Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews and were more likely to use advocacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of inpatients with intellectual disabilities in specialist psychiatric beds continues to decline over time, while the number of autistic inpatients without intellectual disabilities is increasing. Future research should utilise participant-level data to explore patient long-term trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specialist Psychiatric Bed Utilisation by People With Intellectual Disabilities and Autistic People: A Time-Series Analysis Using the English Assuring Transformation Dataset.\",\"authors\":\"Atiyya Nisar, Paul A Thompson, Harm Boer, Haider Al-Delfi, Peter E Langdon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using nationally available anonymised and aggregated English data, we examined specialist and nonspecialist psychiatric bed utilisation by people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data about specialist psychiatric bed utilisation from the Assuring Transformation Dataset, from March 2015 to January 2024, we applied linear regression (with moving average or autoregressive errors) to explore the relationships between a set of outcome variables (e.g., number of inpatients and length of stay) and a set of sociodemographic, clinical and service-related predictor variables (e.g., age, ethnicity, admission source, legal status, admission source, discharge destination, Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews) over time. Comparisons were made with data from the Mental Health Services Data Set about nonspecialist psychiatric bed utilisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over time, there was an average reduction of 8.07 inpatients per month. This reduction was due to a reduction in the number with a length of stay longer than 2 years, and fewer inpatients with intellectual disabilities without autism over time, rather than fewer autistic inpatients without intellectual disabilities; instead, the number of autistic inpatients increased by 6.02 per month. However, overall, there were fewer inpatients in specialist psychiatric beds than in nonspecialist beds by an average of 877 patients, and the number in specialist beds reduced faster than the number in nonspecialist beds over time. We found that more hospital spells were associated with more inpatients older than 18, more detentions under Part III of the Mental Health Act, more inpatients not known to the local authority, and an increased number of White inpatients. More admissions were associated with fewer discharges, while those with a hospital stay longer than 2 years were less likely to have had a postadmission Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews and were more likely to use advocacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of inpatients with intellectual disabilities in specialist psychiatric beds continues to decline over time, while the number of autistic inpatients without intellectual disabilities is increasing. Future research should utilise participant-level data to explore patient long-term trajectories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用全国可获得的匿名和汇总的英语数据,我们检查了智力残疾和/或自闭症患者专科和非专科精神病病床的使用情况。方法:利用2015年3月至2024年1月来自“保证转型数据集”(assure Transformation Dataset)的专业精神科病床利用数据,我们应用线性回归(带移动平均误差或自回归误差)来探索一组结果变量(如住院人数和住院时间)与一组社会人口统计学、临床和服务相关预测变量(如年龄、种族、入院来源、法律地位、入院来源、出院目的地、住院时间和住院时间)之间的关系。护理(教育)和治疗评估)。与来自心理健康服务数据集的关于非专科精神病病床使用的数据进行比较。结果:随着时间的推移,平均每月减少8.07名住院患者。这种减少是由于住院时间超过2年的人数减少,随着时间的推移,没有自闭症的智力残疾住院患者减少,而不是没有智力残疾的自闭症住院患者减少;相反,自闭症住院患者的数量每月增加6.02人。然而,总体而言,专科精神病病床的住院病人比非专科病床平均少877名,而且随着时间的推移,专科病床的数量比非专科病床的数量减少得更快。我们发现,住院时间越长,18岁以上的住院病人越多,根据《精神卫生法》第三部分被拘留的人数越多,地方当局不认识的住院病人越多,白人住院病人的人数也越多。入院次数越多,出院次数越少,而住院时间超过2年的患者入院后接受护理(教育)和治疗评估的可能性越小,更有可能使用宣传。结论:随着时间的推移,精神病专科床位的智力残疾住院患者数量持续下降,而非智力残疾的自闭症住院患者数量呈上升趋势。未来的研究应利用参与者水平的数据来探索患者的长期轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Specialist Psychiatric Bed Utilisation by People With Intellectual Disabilities and Autistic People: A Time-Series Analysis Using the English Assuring Transformation Dataset.

Background: Using nationally available anonymised and aggregated English data, we examined specialist and nonspecialist psychiatric bed utilisation by people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism.

Methods: Using data about specialist psychiatric bed utilisation from the Assuring Transformation Dataset, from March 2015 to January 2024, we applied linear regression (with moving average or autoregressive errors) to explore the relationships between a set of outcome variables (e.g., number of inpatients and length of stay) and a set of sociodemographic, clinical and service-related predictor variables (e.g., age, ethnicity, admission source, legal status, admission source, discharge destination, Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews) over time. Comparisons were made with data from the Mental Health Services Data Set about nonspecialist psychiatric bed utilisation.

Results: Over time, there was an average reduction of 8.07 inpatients per month. This reduction was due to a reduction in the number with a length of stay longer than 2 years, and fewer inpatients with intellectual disabilities without autism over time, rather than fewer autistic inpatients without intellectual disabilities; instead, the number of autistic inpatients increased by 6.02 per month. However, overall, there were fewer inpatients in specialist psychiatric beds than in nonspecialist beds by an average of 877 patients, and the number in specialist beds reduced faster than the number in nonspecialist beds over time. We found that more hospital spells were associated with more inpatients older than 18, more detentions under Part III of the Mental Health Act, more inpatients not known to the local authority, and an increased number of White inpatients. More admissions were associated with fewer discharges, while those with a hospital stay longer than 2 years were less likely to have had a postadmission Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews and were more likely to use advocacy.

Conclusions: The number of inpatients with intellectual disabilities in specialist psychiatric beds continues to decline over time, while the number of autistic inpatients without intellectual disabilities is increasing. Future research should utilise participant-level data to explore patient long-term trajectories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信