Kyungmin Kim, Lauren R Bangerter, Yin Liu, Dawn M Finnie, Maria I Lapid, Joseph E Gaugler, Joan M Griffin
{"title":"配偶和儿童照顾者对痴呆清醒发作的经历:一种混合方法。","authors":"Kyungmin Kim, Lauren R Bangerter, Yin Liu, Dawn M Finnie, Maria I Lapid, Joseph E Gaugler, Joan M Griffin","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Lucid episodes (LEs) in people living with late-stage dementia have been reported anecdotally. However, how this seemingly unexpected phenomenon is experienced by family caregivers is less known. Focusing on the two most common groups of informal caregivers, spouses and adult children, this study examined variability in family caregivers' experiences with LEs-whether they exhibit differential appraisals of and responses to LEs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using a sample of former/bereaved and current family caregivers from UsAgainstAlzheimer's A-LIST, we conducted an online survey of spouse and child caregivers (<i>N</i> = 387). We conducted semistructured interviews among a subset of caregivers who witnessed a LE (<i>n</i> = 22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, child caregivers were more likely to witness a LE than spouse caregivers. Among former/bereaved caregivers who witnessed a LE (<i>n</i> = 139), spouses were likely to report nonverbal communication during LEs, appraise LEs more negatively, and make changes in care decisions, such as end-of-life planning and financial decisions, compared to adult children. Among current caregivers who witnessed a LE (<i>n</i> = 80), spouses often reported no special circumstances preceding LEs, whereas children linked LEs to friend/family visits. No significant differences were found in positive and negative appraisals of LEs between current spouse and child caregivers. Content analysis of qualitative interviews revealed the contexts underlying these differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Differences between spouses and adult children in their experiences with LEs are related to their different caregiving contexts, including relationship history, living arrangements, expectations, motivations, and caregiving resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 6","pages":"igaf036"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spouse and Child Caregivers' Experiences of Lucid Episodes in Dementia: A Mixed Methods Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Kyungmin Kim, Lauren R Bangerter, Yin Liu, Dawn M Finnie, Maria I Lapid, Joseph E Gaugler, Joan M Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igaf036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Lucid episodes (LEs) in people living with late-stage dementia have been reported anecdotally. However, how this seemingly unexpected phenomenon is experienced by family caregivers is less known. Focusing on the two most common groups of informal caregivers, spouses and adult children, this study examined variability in family caregivers' experiences with LEs-whether they exhibit differential appraisals of and responses to LEs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using a sample of former/bereaved and current family caregivers from UsAgainstAlzheimer's A-LIST, we conducted an online survey of spouse and child caregivers (<i>N</i> = 387). We conducted semistructured interviews among a subset of caregivers who witnessed a LE (<i>n</i> = 22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, child caregivers were more likely to witness a LE than spouse caregivers. Among former/bereaved caregivers who witnessed a LE (<i>n</i> = 139), spouses were likely to report nonverbal communication during LEs, appraise LEs more negatively, and make changes in care decisions, such as end-of-life planning and financial decisions, compared to adult children. Among current caregivers who witnessed a LE (<i>n</i> = 80), spouses often reported no special circumstances preceding LEs, whereas children linked LEs to friend/family visits. No significant differences were found in positive and negative appraisals of LEs between current spouse and child caregivers. Content analysis of qualitative interviews revealed the contexts underlying these differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Differences between spouses and adult children in their experiences with LEs are related to their different caregiving contexts, including relationship history, living arrangements, expectations, motivations, and caregiving resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"igaf036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149523/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spouse and Child Caregivers' Experiences of Lucid Episodes in Dementia: A Mixed Methods Approach.
Background and objectives: Lucid episodes (LEs) in people living with late-stage dementia have been reported anecdotally. However, how this seemingly unexpected phenomenon is experienced by family caregivers is less known. Focusing on the two most common groups of informal caregivers, spouses and adult children, this study examined variability in family caregivers' experiences with LEs-whether they exhibit differential appraisals of and responses to LEs.
Research design and methods: Using a sample of former/bereaved and current family caregivers from UsAgainstAlzheimer's A-LIST, we conducted an online survey of spouse and child caregivers (N = 387). We conducted semistructured interviews among a subset of caregivers who witnessed a LE (n = 22).
Results: Overall, child caregivers were more likely to witness a LE than spouse caregivers. Among former/bereaved caregivers who witnessed a LE (n = 139), spouses were likely to report nonverbal communication during LEs, appraise LEs more negatively, and make changes in care decisions, such as end-of-life planning and financial decisions, compared to adult children. Among current caregivers who witnessed a LE (n = 80), spouses often reported no special circumstances preceding LEs, whereas children linked LEs to friend/family visits. No significant differences were found in positive and negative appraisals of LEs between current spouse and child caregivers. Content analysis of qualitative interviews revealed the contexts underlying these differences.
Discussion and implications: Differences between spouses and adult children in their experiences with LEs are related to their different caregiving contexts, including relationship history, living arrangements, expectations, motivations, and caregiving resources.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.