Stefanie Sohn , Lauren Labrecque , Dominik Siemon , Stefan Morana
{"title":"人工智能与人工服务代理:它们的存在如何影响消费者信息隐私问题","authors":"Stefanie Sohn , Lauren Labrecque , Dominik Siemon , Stefan Morana","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Service agents act on behalf of retailers to interact with consumers. Agents’ service delivery requires information from consumers, which may raise consumers’ concerns about their information privacy. While previous research has linked service agents’ presence to perceptions of being watched, little is known about how artificial intelligence (AI) (vs. human) agents’ passive or mere presence affects consumer information privacy concerns—a gap this research aims to address. In a series of experimental studies and drawing on reactance theory, we find that consumers express lesser privacy concerns in the presence of AI (vs. human) service agents, which in turn leads to a greater willingness to share personal information and increased intention to engage with the retailer. To explain this effect, we identify consumers’ perceptions of service agents’ power: consumers perceive AI (vs. human) agents as having less power over them and therefore have lesser privacy concerns. The findings are consistent across various retailer types (e.g., florists, home décor, food, pharmacy) and diverse participant groups. In addition, we identify two boundary conditions of this effect: the trustworthiness of service agents and the timing of their presence (before or after a purchase). Understanding these elements can help retailers effectively manage privacy concerns and strategically determine the presence of different types of service agents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":"101 2","pages":"Pages 263-278"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence versus human service agents: How their presence shapes consumer information privacy concerns\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Sohn , Lauren Labrecque , Dominik Siemon , Stefan Morana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretai.2025.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Service agents act on behalf of retailers to interact with consumers. Agents’ service delivery requires information from consumers, which may raise consumers’ concerns about their information privacy. While previous research has linked service agents’ presence to perceptions of being watched, little is known about how artificial intelligence (AI) (vs. human) agents’ passive or mere presence affects consumer information privacy concerns—a gap this research aims to address. In a series of experimental studies and drawing on reactance theory, we find that consumers express lesser privacy concerns in the presence of AI (vs. human) service agents, which in turn leads to a greater willingness to share personal information and increased intention to engage with the retailer. To explain this effect, we identify consumers’ perceptions of service agents’ power: consumers perceive AI (vs. human) agents as having less power over them and therefore have lesser privacy concerns. The findings are consistent across various retailer types (e.g., florists, home décor, food, pharmacy) and diverse participant groups. In addition, we identify two boundary conditions of this effect: the trustworthiness of service agents and the timing of their presence (before or after a purchase). Understanding these elements can help retailers effectively manage privacy concerns and strategically determine the presence of different types of service agents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing\",\"volume\":\"101 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 263-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435925000247\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435925000247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence versus human service agents: How their presence shapes consumer information privacy concerns
Service agents act on behalf of retailers to interact with consumers. Agents’ service delivery requires information from consumers, which may raise consumers’ concerns about their information privacy. While previous research has linked service agents’ presence to perceptions of being watched, little is known about how artificial intelligence (AI) (vs. human) agents’ passive or mere presence affects consumer information privacy concerns—a gap this research aims to address. In a series of experimental studies and drawing on reactance theory, we find that consumers express lesser privacy concerns in the presence of AI (vs. human) service agents, which in turn leads to a greater willingness to share personal information and increased intention to engage with the retailer. To explain this effect, we identify consumers’ perceptions of service agents’ power: consumers perceive AI (vs. human) agents as having less power over them and therefore have lesser privacy concerns. The findings are consistent across various retailer types (e.g., florists, home décor, food, pharmacy) and diverse participant groups. In addition, we identify two boundary conditions of this effect: the trustworthiness of service agents and the timing of their presence (before or after a purchase). Understanding these elements can help retailers effectively manage privacy concerns and strategically determine the presence of different types of service agents.
期刊介绍:
The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.