源传感器耦合(SoSeC)作为一种有效的工具来定位脑电和脑磁图数据中的交互源。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Florian Göschl , Dionysia Kaziki , Gregor Leicht , Andreas K. Engel , Guido Nolte
{"title":"源传感器耦合(SoSeC)作为一种有效的工具来定位脑电和脑磁图数据中的交互源。","authors":"Florian Göschl ,&nbsp;Dionysia Kaziki ,&nbsp;Gregor Leicht ,&nbsp;Andreas K. Engel ,&nbsp;Guido Nolte","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>A standard approach to estimate interacting sources from EEG or MEG data is to first calculate a coupling between all pairs of voxels on a predefined grid within the brain and then average or maximize this coupling matrix along each column or row. Depending on the chosen coupling measure and grid size this approach can be computationally very costly, in particular when a bias is supposed to be removed.</div></div><div><h3>New Method:</h3><div>We here suggest to replace this approach by a maximization of coupling between each source and the signal in sensor space. The idea is that any neuronal activity which can be estimated from recorded data must be present in sensor space in the first place. Using the imaginary part of coherency as coupling measure makes sure that we do not confuse this source to sensor coupling with a coupling of a source to itself. The presentation of this specific method is augmented with a discussion of conceptual issues for various forms of vector beamformers and eLoreta.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We found in simulations and empirical EEG data that the method is capable to robustly detect coupled sources.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods:</h3><div>We found that the approach is hundreds of times faster than comparable conventional approaches. Results for EEG resting state data indicate that the new approach has also more statistical power than conventional approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The new approach is an effective tool to identify interacting sources from cross-spectra of EEG and MEG data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"422 ","pages":"Article 110494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source to sensor coupling (SoSeC) as an effective tool to localize interacting sources from EEG and MEG data\",\"authors\":\"Florian Göschl ,&nbsp;Dionysia Kaziki ,&nbsp;Gregor Leicht ,&nbsp;Andreas K. Engel ,&nbsp;Guido Nolte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>A standard approach to estimate interacting sources from EEG or MEG data is to first calculate a coupling between all pairs of voxels on a predefined grid within the brain and then average or maximize this coupling matrix along each column or row. Depending on the chosen coupling measure and grid size this approach can be computationally very costly, in particular when a bias is supposed to be removed.</div></div><div><h3>New Method:</h3><div>We here suggest to replace this approach by a maximization of coupling between each source and the signal in sensor space. The idea is that any neuronal activity which can be estimated from recorded data must be present in sensor space in the first place. Using the imaginary part of coherency as coupling measure makes sure that we do not confuse this source to sensor coupling with a coupling of a source to itself. The presentation of this specific method is augmented with a discussion of conceptual issues for various forms of vector beamformers and eLoreta.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We found in simulations and empirical EEG data that the method is capable to robustly detect coupled sources.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods:</h3><div>We found that the approach is hundreds of times faster than comparable conventional approaches. Results for EEG resting state data indicate that the new approach has also more statistical power than conventional approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The new approach is an effective tool to identify interacting sources from cross-spectra of EEG and MEG data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"volume\":\"422 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025001359\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025001359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从EEG或MEG数据中估计交互源的标准方法是首先计算大脑内预定义网格上所有体素对之间的耦合,然后沿每列或每行平均或最大化该耦合矩阵。根据所选择的耦合度量和网格大小,这种方法在计算上可能非常昂贵,特别是在应该消除偏差的情况下。新方法:我们在这里建议用传感器空间中每个源和信号之间的最大耦合来取代这种方法。这个想法是,任何可以从记录数据中估计的神经元活动,首先必须存在于传感器空间中。使用相干的虚部作为耦合度量,可以确保我们不会将源与传感器的耦合与源与自身的耦合混淆。对各种形式的矢量波束形成器和eLoreta的概念问题进行了讨论,从而扩大了这种特定方法的介绍。结果:通过仿真和经验脑电图数据,我们发现该方法能够鲁棒地检测耦合源。与现有方法的比较:我们发现该方法比可比的传统方法快数百倍。对脑电静息状态数据的分析结果表明,该方法比传统方法具有更强的统计能力。结论:该方法可以有效地从脑电和脑磁图数据的交叉谱中识别相互作用源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Source to sensor coupling (SoSeC) as an effective tool to localize interacting sources from EEG and MEG data

Background:

A standard approach to estimate interacting sources from EEG or MEG data is to first calculate a coupling between all pairs of voxels on a predefined grid within the brain and then average or maximize this coupling matrix along each column or row. Depending on the chosen coupling measure and grid size this approach can be computationally very costly, in particular when a bias is supposed to be removed.

New Method:

We here suggest to replace this approach by a maximization of coupling between each source and the signal in sensor space. The idea is that any neuronal activity which can be estimated from recorded data must be present in sensor space in the first place. Using the imaginary part of coherency as coupling measure makes sure that we do not confuse this source to sensor coupling with a coupling of a source to itself. The presentation of this specific method is augmented with a discussion of conceptual issues for various forms of vector beamformers and eLoreta.

Results:

We found in simulations and empirical EEG data that the method is capable to robustly detect coupled sources.

Comparison with existing methods:

We found that the approach is hundreds of times faster than comparable conventional approaches. Results for EEG resting state data indicate that the new approach has also more statistical power than conventional approaches.

Conclusion:

The new approach is an effective tool to identify interacting sources from cross-spectra of EEG and MEG data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信