一项针对有饮食失调风险的2型糖尿病患者的强化减肥计划(ARIADNE):一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验

IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Elena Tsompanaki, Paul Aveyard, Rebecca J Park, Susan A Jebb, Dimitrios A Koutoukidis
{"title":"一项针对有饮食失调风险的2型糖尿病患者的强化减肥计划(ARIADNE):一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验","authors":"Elena Tsompanaki, Paul Aveyard, Rebecca J Park, Susan A Jebb, Dimitrios A Koutoukidis","doi":"10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00126-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>There are concerns that low-energy total diet replacement (TDR) programmes could trigger eating disorders, given their focus on weight and rigid dietary rules. We aimed to assess the effect of a TDR programme on eating disorder symptoms in people living with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes at high risk of developing an eating disorder.<h3>Methods</h3>In this randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, participants with type 2 diabetes, overweight, and eating disorder symptoms across England were randomly assigned (1:1) to a low-energy TDR programme with formula products and behavioural support delivered remotely, or usual care. In brief, the intervention comprised 12 weeks of low-energy TDR in a nutritionally complete package of soups, shakes, and bars. After the 12 weeks, the intervention continued with stepped food reintroduction (around 8 weeks) based on a low-energy, nutrient-rich diet, followed by weight maintenance advice (around 4 weeks), personalised to an individual participant's circumstances and preferences. Participants allocated to the control group received usual care for their diabetes. The primary outcome was the change in eating disorder symptoms using the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) global score at 6 months (programme end). Safety was determined by the incidence of cases with high suspicion of a new eating disorder. The primary outcome analysis had an upper non-inferiority margin for EDE-Q of +1 SD (0·72). People with lived experience were involved throughout the trial and provided input on study conceptualisation, protocol development, delivery of the intervention, and intervention materials. The study was registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT05744232</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>.<h3>Findings</h3>Between March 8, 2023, and Sept 12, 2023, 56 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (28 participants) or control group (28 participants). Participants had a mean age of 49·9 years (SD 8·1). 35 (63%) of 56 participants were women, 20 (36%) were men, and one (2%) was non-binary. 54 (96%) of participants were White and two (4%) were Asian. Participants had a mean BMI of 39·6 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (SD 7·8) and a mean EDE-Q global score of 3·3 (0·4). 49 (88%) of 56 participants provided outcome data at 6 months and 45 (80%) at 1 year. At completion of the programme at 6 months, the mean weight loss was –13·9 kg (SD 11·2) in the intervention group and –3·7 kg (7·9) in the control group, with a between-group difference of –10·2 kg (95% CI –14·2 to –6·2). The between-group difference in the EDE-Q score was –0·8 points (–1·4 to –0·3) at 6 months, indicating non-inferiority. At 12 months, weight change was not different between groups, but non-inferiority and superiority in EDE-Q remained. No participants were suspected of having developed an eating disorder. 13 adverse events were documented, of which one, a cholecystectomy, was serious.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Participation in a supported TDR programme did not worsen eating disorder symptoms in people with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes at high risk of developing an eating disorder. We found no evidence these programmes cause harm and a suggestion of benefit on eating disorder symptoms, independent of weight loss.<h3>Funding</h3>Novo Nordisk UK Research Foundation.","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An intensive weight loss programme with behavioural support for people with type 2 diabetes at risk of eating disorders in England (ARIADNE): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial\",\"authors\":\"Elena Tsompanaki, Paul Aveyard, Rebecca J Park, Susan A Jebb, Dimitrios A Koutoukidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00126-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>There are concerns that low-energy total diet replacement (TDR) programmes could trigger eating disorders, given their focus on weight and rigid dietary rules. We aimed to assess the effect of a TDR programme on eating disorder symptoms in people living with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes at high risk of developing an eating disorder.<h3>Methods</h3>In this randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, participants with type 2 diabetes, overweight, and eating disorder symptoms across England were randomly assigned (1:1) to a low-energy TDR programme with formula products and behavioural support delivered remotely, or usual care. In brief, the intervention comprised 12 weeks of low-energy TDR in a nutritionally complete package of soups, shakes, and bars. After the 12 weeks, the intervention continued with stepped food reintroduction (around 8 weeks) based on a low-energy, nutrient-rich diet, followed by weight maintenance advice (around 4 weeks), personalised to an individual participant's circumstances and preferences. Participants allocated to the control group received usual care for their diabetes. The primary outcome was the change in eating disorder symptoms using the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) global score at 6 months (programme end). Safety was determined by the incidence of cases with high suspicion of a new eating disorder. The primary outcome analysis had an upper non-inferiority margin for EDE-Q of +1 SD (0·72). People with lived experience were involved throughout the trial and provided input on study conceptualisation, protocol development, delivery of the intervention, and intervention materials. The study was registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT05744232</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>.<h3>Findings</h3>Between March 8, 2023, and Sept 12, 2023, 56 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (28 participants) or control group (28 participants). Participants had a mean age of 49·9 years (SD 8·1). 35 (63%) of 56 participants were women, 20 (36%) were men, and one (2%) was non-binary. 54 (96%) of participants were White and two (4%) were Asian. Participants had a mean BMI of 39·6 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (SD 7·8) and a mean EDE-Q global score of 3·3 (0·4). 49 (88%) of 56 participants provided outcome data at 6 months and 45 (80%) at 1 year. At completion of the programme at 6 months, the mean weight loss was –13·9 kg (SD 11·2) in the intervention group and –3·7 kg (7·9) in the control group, with a between-group difference of –10·2 kg (95% CI –14·2 to –6·2). The between-group difference in the EDE-Q score was –0·8 points (–1·4 to –0·3) at 6 months, indicating non-inferiority. At 12 months, weight change was not different between groups, but non-inferiority and superiority in EDE-Q remained. No participants were suspected of having developed an eating disorder. 13 adverse events were documented, of which one, a cholecystectomy, was serious.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Participation in a supported TDR programme did not worsen eating disorder symptoms in people with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes at high risk of developing an eating disorder. We found no evidence these programmes cause harm and a suggestion of benefit on eating disorder symptoms, independent of weight loss.<h3>Funding</h3>Novo Nordisk UK Research Foundation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":30.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00126-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00126-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有人担心,低能量完全饮食替代计划(TDR)可能引发饮食失调,因为它们关注体重和严格的饮食规则。我们的目的是评估TDR项目对超重或肥胖和2型糖尿病高危饮食失调患者饮食失调症状的影响。方法:在这项随机、对照、非劣效性试验中,英格兰各地患有2型糖尿病、超重和饮食失调症状的参与者被随机分配(1:1)到低能量TDR计划中,该计划使用配方产品和远程提供的行为支持,或常规护理。简而言之,干预包括12周的低能量TDR,包括营养完整的汤、奶昔和巧克力棒。12周后,干预继续进行,以低能量、营养丰富的饮食为基础,逐步重新引入食物(约8周),然后根据参与者的个人情况和偏好提供体重维持建议(约4周)。被分配到对照组的参与者接受常规的糖尿病治疗。主要结局是在6个月(项目结束)时使用饮食失调检查问卷(ed - q)整体评分来观察饮食失调症状的变化。安全性是由高度怀疑有一种新的饮食失调的病例发生率决定的。主要结局分析ed - q的非劣效性上限为+1 SD(0.72)。在整个试验过程中,有生活经验的人都参与其中,并为研究概念化、方案制定、干预措施的提供和干预材料提供意见。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT05744232。在2023年3月8日至2023年9月12日期间,56名参与者被随机分配到干预组(28名参与者)或对照组(28名参与者)。参与者的平均年龄为49.9岁(标准差为8.1)。56名参与者中有35名(63%)是女性,20名(36%)是男性,1名(2%)是非二元性别。54人(96%)是白人,2人(4%)是亚洲人。参与者的平均BMI为39.6 kg/m2 (SD为7.8),平均ed - q整体评分为3.3(0.4)。56名参与者中有49名(88%)提供了6个月的结果数据,45名(80%)提供了1年的结果数据。在6个月方案完成时,干预组的平均体重减轻为- 13.9 kg (SD 11.2),对照组的平均体重减轻为- 3.7 kg(7.9),组间差异为- 10.2 kg (95% CI - 14.2至- 6.2)。6个月时ed - q评分组间差异为- 0.8分(- 1.4 ~ - 0.3分),无劣效性。12个月时,各组体重变化无显著差异,但ed - q的非劣效性和优胜性仍然存在。没有参与者被怀疑患有饮食失调症。记录了13例不良事件,其中一例严重的胆囊切除术。参与一项受支持的TDR规划并未使超重或肥胖和2型糖尿病患者的饮食失调症状恶化,这些患者有发生饮食失调的高风险。我们没有发现任何证据表明这些计划会造成伤害,并暗示对饮食失调症状有益,独立于体重减轻。诺和诺德英国研究基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An intensive weight loss programme with behavioural support for people with type 2 diabetes at risk of eating disorders in England (ARIADNE): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

Background

There are concerns that low-energy total diet replacement (TDR) programmes could trigger eating disorders, given their focus on weight and rigid dietary rules. We aimed to assess the effect of a TDR programme on eating disorder symptoms in people living with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes at high risk of developing an eating disorder.

Methods

In this randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, participants with type 2 diabetes, overweight, and eating disorder symptoms across England were randomly assigned (1:1) to a low-energy TDR programme with formula products and behavioural support delivered remotely, or usual care. In brief, the intervention comprised 12 weeks of low-energy TDR in a nutritionally complete package of soups, shakes, and bars. After the 12 weeks, the intervention continued with stepped food reintroduction (around 8 weeks) based on a low-energy, nutrient-rich diet, followed by weight maintenance advice (around 4 weeks), personalised to an individual participant's circumstances and preferences. Participants allocated to the control group received usual care for their diabetes. The primary outcome was the change in eating disorder symptoms using the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) global score at 6 months (programme end). Safety was determined by the incidence of cases with high suspicion of a new eating disorder. The primary outcome analysis had an upper non-inferiority margin for EDE-Q of +1 SD (0·72). People with lived experience were involved throughout the trial and provided input on study conceptualisation, protocol development, delivery of the intervention, and intervention materials. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05744232.

Findings

Between March 8, 2023, and Sept 12, 2023, 56 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (28 participants) or control group (28 participants). Participants had a mean age of 49·9 years (SD 8·1). 35 (63%) of 56 participants were women, 20 (36%) were men, and one (2%) was non-binary. 54 (96%) of participants were White and two (4%) were Asian. Participants had a mean BMI of 39·6 kg/m2 (SD 7·8) and a mean EDE-Q global score of 3·3 (0·4). 49 (88%) of 56 participants provided outcome data at 6 months and 45 (80%) at 1 year. At completion of the programme at 6 months, the mean weight loss was –13·9 kg (SD 11·2) in the intervention group and –3·7 kg (7·9) in the control group, with a between-group difference of –10·2 kg (95% CI –14·2 to –6·2). The between-group difference in the EDE-Q score was –0·8 points (–1·4 to –0·3) at 6 months, indicating non-inferiority. At 12 months, weight change was not different between groups, but non-inferiority and superiority in EDE-Q remained. No participants were suspected of having developed an eating disorder. 13 adverse events were documented, of which one, a cholecystectomy, was serious.

Interpretation

Participation in a supported TDR programme did not worsen eating disorder symptoms in people with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes at high risk of developing an eating disorder. We found no evidence these programmes cause harm and a suggestion of benefit on eating disorder symptoms, independent of weight loss.

Funding

Novo Nordisk UK Research Foundation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Psychiatry
Lancet Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
58.30
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信