后路、经椎间孔、极路、斜路和前路腰椎椎间融合手术模型的生物力学分析:一项有限元研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Yutang Xie, Lei Ma, Zhengbiao Yang, Haochen Li, Wangping Duan, Kai Zhang, Yun Lv, Jing Chen, Yanru Xue, Yanqin Wang, Pengcui Li, Xiaochun Wei, Meng Zhang, Xuemei Fan, Xiaogang Wu, Weiyi Chen
{"title":"后路、经椎间孔、极路、斜路和前路腰椎椎间融合手术模型的生物力学分析:一项有限元研究。","authors":"Yutang Xie, Lei Ma, Zhengbiao Yang, Haochen Li, Wangping Duan, Kai Zhang, Yun Lv, Jing Chen, Yanru Xue, Yanqin Wang, Pengcui Li, Xiaochun Wei, Meng Zhang, Xuemei Fan, Xiaogang Wu, Weiyi Chen","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2025.2514135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many lumbar interbody fusion methods have been proposed, but there is a relative scarcity of fundamental biomechanical research on these varied surgical procedures. In this study, a finite element model of an L4-L5 functional spinal unit was created and five interbody fusion methods were evaluated, including posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Static and harmonic vibration surgery analysis models were developed based on it, investigating the biomechanical properties, as well as the variation of strain energy. Results indicate that while OLIF and XLIF produced similar biomechanical outcomes, 45.8% higher facet joint contact stress in OLIF compared to XLIF. In contrast, TLIF and PLIF exhibit superior performance, with TLIF showing stress concentration on the left-side screw. ALIF outperformed other models in terms of overall stability, but has significantly higher stress peaks and sensitivity to vibration loads. In general, PLIF exhibits no significant shortcomings, TLIF offers excellent dynamic performance, OLIF and XLIF may exert greater pressure on the facet joints, and ALIF provides optimal stability. The integration of these findings into clinical practice can provide a theoretical basis for clinical surgeons when selecting surgical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical analysis of posterior, transforaminal, extreme, oblique, and anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgical models: a finite element study.\",\"authors\":\"Yutang Xie, Lei Ma, Zhengbiao Yang, Haochen Li, Wangping Duan, Kai Zhang, Yun Lv, Jing Chen, Yanru Xue, Yanqin Wang, Pengcui Li, Xiaochun Wei, Meng Zhang, Xuemei Fan, Xiaogang Wu, Weiyi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10255842.2025.2514135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many lumbar interbody fusion methods have been proposed, but there is a relative scarcity of fundamental biomechanical research on these varied surgical procedures. In this study, a finite element model of an L4-L5 functional spinal unit was created and five interbody fusion methods were evaluated, including posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Static and harmonic vibration surgery analysis models were developed based on it, investigating the biomechanical properties, as well as the variation of strain energy. Results indicate that while OLIF and XLIF produced similar biomechanical outcomes, 45.8% higher facet joint contact stress in OLIF compared to XLIF. In contrast, TLIF and PLIF exhibit superior performance, with TLIF showing stress concentration on the left-side screw. ALIF outperformed other models in terms of overall stability, but has significantly higher stress peaks and sensitivity to vibration loads. In general, PLIF exhibits no significant shortcomings, TLIF offers excellent dynamic performance, OLIF and XLIF may exert greater pressure on the facet joints, and ALIF provides optimal stability. The integration of these findings into clinical practice can provide a theoretical basis for clinical surgeons when selecting surgical approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2025.2514135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2025.2514135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多腰椎椎体间融合术已被提出,但对这些不同手术方法的基础生物力学研究相对缺乏。在本研究中,建立了L4-L5功能脊柱单元的有限元模型,并评估了五种椎间融合方法,包括后路腰椎椎间融合(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合(TLIF)、极外侧椎间融合(XLIF)、斜外侧椎间融合(OLIF)和前路腰椎椎间融合(ALIF)。在此基础上建立了静力和简谐振动手术分析模型,研究了生物力学特性以及应变能的变化。结果表明,虽然OLIF和XLIF产生相似的生物力学结果,但OLIF的小关节接触应力比XLIF高45.8%。相比之下,TLIF和PLIF表现出更好的性能,TLIF显示应力集中在左侧螺钉上。ALIF在整体稳定性方面优于其他模型,但应力峰值和对振动载荷的敏感性明显更高。总的来说,PLIF没有明显的缺点,TLIF提供了出色的动态性能,OLIF和XLIF可能对关节突关节施加更大的压力,ALIF提供了最佳的稳定性。将这些发现与临床实践相结合,可为临床外科医生选择手术入路提供理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical analysis of posterior, transforaminal, extreme, oblique, and anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgical models: a finite element study.

Many lumbar interbody fusion methods have been proposed, but there is a relative scarcity of fundamental biomechanical research on these varied surgical procedures. In this study, a finite element model of an L4-L5 functional spinal unit was created and five interbody fusion methods were evaluated, including posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Static and harmonic vibration surgery analysis models were developed based on it, investigating the biomechanical properties, as well as the variation of strain energy. Results indicate that while OLIF and XLIF produced similar biomechanical outcomes, 45.8% higher facet joint contact stress in OLIF compared to XLIF. In contrast, TLIF and PLIF exhibit superior performance, with TLIF showing stress concentration on the left-side screw. ALIF outperformed other models in terms of overall stability, but has significantly higher stress peaks and sensitivity to vibration loads. In general, PLIF exhibits no significant shortcomings, TLIF offers excellent dynamic performance, OLIF and XLIF may exert greater pressure on the facet joints, and ALIF provides optimal stability. The integration of these findings into clinical practice can provide a theoretical basis for clinical surgeons when selecting surgical approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
179
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信