{"title":"后路、经椎间孔、极路、斜路和前路腰椎椎间融合手术模型的生物力学分析:一项有限元研究。","authors":"Yutang Xie, Lei Ma, Zhengbiao Yang, Haochen Li, Wangping Duan, Kai Zhang, Yun Lv, Jing Chen, Yanru Xue, Yanqin Wang, Pengcui Li, Xiaochun Wei, Meng Zhang, Xuemei Fan, Xiaogang Wu, Weiyi Chen","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2025.2514135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many lumbar interbody fusion methods have been proposed, but there is a relative scarcity of fundamental biomechanical research on these varied surgical procedures. In this study, a finite element model of an L4-L5 functional spinal unit was created and five interbody fusion methods were evaluated, including posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Static and harmonic vibration surgery analysis models were developed based on it, investigating the biomechanical properties, as well as the variation of strain energy. Results indicate that while OLIF and XLIF produced similar biomechanical outcomes, 45.8% higher facet joint contact stress in OLIF compared to XLIF. In contrast, TLIF and PLIF exhibit superior performance, with TLIF showing stress concentration on the left-side screw. ALIF outperformed other models in terms of overall stability, but has significantly higher stress peaks and sensitivity to vibration loads. In general, PLIF exhibits no significant shortcomings, TLIF offers excellent dynamic performance, OLIF and XLIF may exert greater pressure on the facet joints, and ALIF provides optimal stability. The integration of these findings into clinical practice can provide a theoretical basis for clinical surgeons when selecting surgical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical analysis of posterior, transforaminal, extreme, oblique, and anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgical models: a finite element study.\",\"authors\":\"Yutang Xie, Lei Ma, Zhengbiao Yang, Haochen Li, Wangping Duan, Kai Zhang, Yun Lv, Jing Chen, Yanru Xue, Yanqin Wang, Pengcui Li, Xiaochun Wei, Meng Zhang, Xuemei Fan, Xiaogang Wu, Weiyi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10255842.2025.2514135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many lumbar interbody fusion methods have been proposed, but there is a relative scarcity of fundamental biomechanical research on these varied surgical procedures. In this study, a finite element model of an L4-L5 functional spinal unit was created and five interbody fusion methods were evaluated, including posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Static and harmonic vibration surgery analysis models were developed based on it, investigating the biomechanical properties, as well as the variation of strain energy. Results indicate that while OLIF and XLIF produced similar biomechanical outcomes, 45.8% higher facet joint contact stress in OLIF compared to XLIF. In contrast, TLIF and PLIF exhibit superior performance, with TLIF showing stress concentration on the left-side screw. ALIF outperformed other models in terms of overall stability, but has significantly higher stress peaks and sensitivity to vibration loads. In general, PLIF exhibits no significant shortcomings, TLIF offers excellent dynamic performance, OLIF and XLIF may exert greater pressure on the facet joints, and ALIF provides optimal stability. The integration of these findings into clinical practice can provide a theoretical basis for clinical surgeons when selecting surgical approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2025.2514135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2025.2514135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomechanical analysis of posterior, transforaminal, extreme, oblique, and anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgical models: a finite element study.
Many lumbar interbody fusion methods have been proposed, but there is a relative scarcity of fundamental biomechanical research on these varied surgical procedures. In this study, a finite element model of an L4-L5 functional spinal unit was created and five interbody fusion methods were evaluated, including posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Static and harmonic vibration surgery analysis models were developed based on it, investigating the biomechanical properties, as well as the variation of strain energy. Results indicate that while OLIF and XLIF produced similar biomechanical outcomes, 45.8% higher facet joint contact stress in OLIF compared to XLIF. In contrast, TLIF and PLIF exhibit superior performance, with TLIF showing stress concentration on the left-side screw. ALIF outperformed other models in terms of overall stability, but has significantly higher stress peaks and sensitivity to vibration loads. In general, PLIF exhibits no significant shortcomings, TLIF offers excellent dynamic performance, OLIF and XLIF may exert greater pressure on the facet joints, and ALIF provides optimal stability. The integration of these findings into clinical practice can provide a theoretical basis for clinical surgeons when selecting surgical approaches.
期刊介绍:
The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.