Bin Zhang, Wenyi Mao, Zhen Hu, Yingshu Cai, Ning Xie, Zhenlin Weng
{"title":"生计资本如何影响种植优质水稻的专业种粮农户的绿色生产行为?","authors":"Bin Zhang, Wenyi Mao, Zhen Hu, Yingshu Cai, Ning Xie, Zhenlin Weng","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2025.1555488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As a vital food crop in China, the sustainable production of high-quality rice is essential for ensuring food security and facilitating the green transformation of agriculture. However, the limited adoption of green production technologies for high-quality rice among farmers poses a significant obstacle to the sustainable development of the grain sector. While previous studies have primarily focused on the adoption of green technologies by traditional farmers, there has been a lack of attention on professional grain farmers as a distinct category of agricultural operators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study, based on the sustainable livelihood framework, focuses on professional grain farmers. By analyzing data from 655 professional grain farmers in Jiangxi Province and utilizing the ordered logit model, we analyzed and validated the influence of livelihood capital on the green production behaviors. Additionally, we applied mediating and moderating effect models to clarify the roles of value cognition and government regulation in this relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found the following: (1) livelihood capital significantly and positively affects the green production behaviors of professional grain farmers. Specifically, human capital, natural capital, financial capital, and social capital all contribute to the adoption of green production practices. (2) The relationships between livelihood capital and green production behavior are partially mediated by perceptions of economic, ecological, and social benefits, with the mediating effects ranked in descending order. (3) Government regulation acts as a moderator, where stronger incentive and guidance policies amplify the influence of livelihood capital on professional grain farmers' green production behaviors. (4) Heterogeneity analysis indicates that livelihood capital and value perception have a more pronounced effect on green production behaviors among farmers with higher levels of livelihood capital.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on these results, the study suggests enhancing the allocation of farmers' livelihood capital, intensifying the dissemination and education of green production technologies, and strengthening policy incentives and guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"12 ","pages":"1555488"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does livelihood capital influence the green production behaviors among professional grain farmers cultivating high-quality rice?\",\"authors\":\"Bin Zhang, Wenyi Mao, Zhen Hu, Yingshu Cai, Ning Xie, Zhenlin Weng\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnut.2025.1555488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As a vital food crop in China, the sustainable production of high-quality rice is essential for ensuring food security and facilitating the green transformation of agriculture. However, the limited adoption of green production technologies for high-quality rice among farmers poses a significant obstacle to the sustainable development of the grain sector. While previous studies have primarily focused on the adoption of green technologies by traditional farmers, there has been a lack of attention on professional grain farmers as a distinct category of agricultural operators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study, based on the sustainable livelihood framework, focuses on professional grain farmers. By analyzing data from 655 professional grain farmers in Jiangxi Province and utilizing the ordered logit model, we analyzed and validated the influence of livelihood capital on the green production behaviors. Additionally, we applied mediating and moderating effect models to clarify the roles of value cognition and government regulation in this relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found the following: (1) livelihood capital significantly and positively affects the green production behaviors of professional grain farmers. Specifically, human capital, natural capital, financial capital, and social capital all contribute to the adoption of green production practices. (2) The relationships between livelihood capital and green production behavior are partially mediated by perceptions of economic, ecological, and social benefits, with the mediating effects ranked in descending order. (3) Government regulation acts as a moderator, where stronger incentive and guidance policies amplify the influence of livelihood capital on professional grain farmers' green production behaviors. (4) Heterogeneity analysis indicates that livelihood capital and value perception have a more pronounced effect on green production behaviors among farmers with higher levels of livelihood capital.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on these results, the study suggests enhancing the allocation of farmers' livelihood capital, intensifying the dissemination and education of green production technologies, and strengthening policy incentives and guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1555488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146195/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1555488\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1555488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
How does livelihood capital influence the green production behaviors among professional grain farmers cultivating high-quality rice?
Introduction: As a vital food crop in China, the sustainable production of high-quality rice is essential for ensuring food security and facilitating the green transformation of agriculture. However, the limited adoption of green production technologies for high-quality rice among farmers poses a significant obstacle to the sustainable development of the grain sector. While previous studies have primarily focused on the adoption of green technologies by traditional farmers, there has been a lack of attention on professional grain farmers as a distinct category of agricultural operators.
Methods: This study, based on the sustainable livelihood framework, focuses on professional grain farmers. By analyzing data from 655 professional grain farmers in Jiangxi Province and utilizing the ordered logit model, we analyzed and validated the influence of livelihood capital on the green production behaviors. Additionally, we applied mediating and moderating effect models to clarify the roles of value cognition and government regulation in this relationship.
Results: The study found the following: (1) livelihood capital significantly and positively affects the green production behaviors of professional grain farmers. Specifically, human capital, natural capital, financial capital, and social capital all contribute to the adoption of green production practices. (2) The relationships between livelihood capital and green production behavior are partially mediated by perceptions of economic, ecological, and social benefits, with the mediating effects ranked in descending order. (3) Government regulation acts as a moderator, where stronger incentive and guidance policies amplify the influence of livelihood capital on professional grain farmers' green production behaviors. (4) Heterogeneity analysis indicates that livelihood capital and value perception have a more pronounced effect on green production behaviors among farmers with higher levels of livelihood capital.
Discussion: Based on these results, the study suggests enhancing the allocation of farmers' livelihood capital, intensifying the dissemination and education of green production technologies, and strengthening policy incentives and guidance.
期刊介绍:
No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health.
Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.