Claire O'Dwyer, Conal Twomey, Brid Davis, John Sharry, Eileen Brosnan, Alan Carr
{"title":"父母加上系统的,以解决方案为重点的父母培训计划:更新的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Claire O'Dwyer, Conal Twomey, Brid Davis, John Sharry, Eileen Brosnan, Alan Carr","doi":"10.1111/famp.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic review and meta-analysis of Parent Plus (PP) Program evaluation studies aimed to update a previous meta-analysis published in 2017. PP programs are systemic, solution-focused, group-based parent training interventions for the prevention and treatment of a range of child and adolescent problems. Controlled or uncontrolled, randomized or non-randomized trials involving at least 10 cases which evaluated PP programs were included in the review. PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and ERIC databases were searched from January 2016 to January 2014. Risk of bias was evaluated with RoB2 and ROBINS-I. Since the last meta-analysis, the pool of PP studies has increased by 25%. This updated meta-analysis included 21 studies involving 1179 families. In controlled trials, there were significant between-group, post-intervention effect sizes for child behavior (<i>g</i> = 0.42 [0.25, 0.59], <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>k</i> = 13), goal attainment (<i>g</i> = 1.22 [0.83, 1.60], <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>k</i> = 9), parental satisfaction (<i>g</i> = 0.67 [0.36, 0.98], <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>k</i> = 8) and parental stress (<i>g</i> = 0.45 [0.20, 0.71], <i>p</i> < 0.01, <i>k</i> = 10) favoring PP programs. The main limitation of the review was the risk of bias in the primary studies reviewed. This updated meta-analysis shows that PP programs are evidence-based, systemic interventions that may lead to positive outcomes for families of children with emotional and behavioral problems, post-divorce adjustment difficulties, intellectual disability, ADHD, and at risk of obesity.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> PROSPERO: CRD42024504594</p>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/famp.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parents Plus Systemic, Solution-Focused Parent Training Programs: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Claire O'Dwyer, Conal Twomey, Brid Davis, John Sharry, Eileen Brosnan, Alan Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/famp.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This systematic review and meta-analysis of Parent Plus (PP) Program evaluation studies aimed to update a previous meta-analysis published in 2017. PP programs are systemic, solution-focused, group-based parent training interventions for the prevention and treatment of a range of child and adolescent problems. Controlled or uncontrolled, randomized or non-randomized trials involving at least 10 cases which evaluated PP programs were included in the review. PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and ERIC databases were searched from January 2016 to January 2014. Risk of bias was evaluated with RoB2 and ROBINS-I. Since the last meta-analysis, the pool of PP studies has increased by 25%. This updated meta-analysis included 21 studies involving 1179 families. In controlled trials, there were significant between-group, post-intervention effect sizes for child behavior (<i>g</i> = 0.42 [0.25, 0.59], <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>k</i> = 13), goal attainment (<i>g</i> = 1.22 [0.83, 1.60], <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>k</i> = 9), parental satisfaction (<i>g</i> = 0.67 [0.36, 0.98], <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>k</i> = 8) and parental stress (<i>g</i> = 0.45 [0.20, 0.71], <i>p</i> < 0.01, <i>k</i> = 10) favoring PP programs. The main limitation of the review was the risk of bias in the primary studies reviewed. This updated meta-analysis shows that PP programs are evidence-based, systemic interventions that may lead to positive outcomes for families of children with emotional and behavioral problems, post-divorce adjustment difficulties, intellectual disability, ADHD, and at risk of obesity.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> PROSPERO: CRD42024504594</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Process\",\"volume\":\"64 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/famp.70049\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究系统回顾和荟萃分析了Parent Plus (PP)项目评估研究,旨在更新2017年发表的一项荟萃分析。PP项目是系统的、以解决方案为重点的、以团体为基础的家长培训干预措施,用于预防和治疗一系列儿童和青少年问题。本综述纳入了至少10例评估PP方案的对照或非对照、随机或非随机试验。检索PsycINFO、PubMed、CINAHL和ERIC数据库,检索时间为2016年1月至2014年1月。采用RoB2和ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。自上次荟萃分析以来,PP研究的数量增加了25%。这项更新的荟萃分析包括21项研究,涉及1179个家庭。在对照试验中,儿童行为(g = 0.42 [0.25, 0.59], p < 0.001, k = 13)、目标实现(g = 1.22 [0.83, 1.60], p < 0.001, k = 9)、父母满意度(g = 0.67 [0.36, 0.98], p < 0.001, k = 8)和父母压力(g = 0.45 [0.20, 0.71], p < 0.01, k = 10)的干预后组间效应显著。本综述的主要局限性是所综述的主要研究存在偏倚风险。这一最新的荟萃分析表明,PP项目是基于证据的系统性干预措施,可能会为有情绪和行为问题、离婚后适应困难、智力残疾、多动症和肥胖风险的儿童的家庭带来积极的结果。试验注册:PROSPERO: CRD42024504594
Parents Plus Systemic, Solution-Focused Parent Training Programs: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis of Parent Plus (PP) Program evaluation studies aimed to update a previous meta-analysis published in 2017. PP programs are systemic, solution-focused, group-based parent training interventions for the prevention and treatment of a range of child and adolescent problems. Controlled or uncontrolled, randomized or non-randomized trials involving at least 10 cases which evaluated PP programs were included in the review. PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and ERIC databases were searched from January 2016 to January 2014. Risk of bias was evaluated with RoB2 and ROBINS-I. Since the last meta-analysis, the pool of PP studies has increased by 25%. This updated meta-analysis included 21 studies involving 1179 families. In controlled trials, there were significant between-group, post-intervention effect sizes for child behavior (g = 0.42 [0.25, 0.59], p < 0.001, k = 13), goal attainment (g = 1.22 [0.83, 1.60], p < 0.001, k = 9), parental satisfaction (g = 0.67 [0.36, 0.98], p < 0.001, k = 8) and parental stress (g = 0.45 [0.20, 0.71], p < 0.01, k = 10) favoring PP programs. The main limitation of the review was the risk of bias in the primary studies reviewed. This updated meta-analysis shows that PP programs are evidence-based, systemic interventions that may lead to positive outcomes for families of children with emotional and behavioral problems, post-divorce adjustment difficulties, intellectual disability, ADHD, and at risk of obesity.
期刊介绍:
Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.