{"title":"EDE和EDE- q:在重温经典时呼吁广泛的国际合作,Reilly等人的评论(2025)。","authors":"Paulo P. P. Machado","doi":"10.1002/eat.24481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In their 2025 article in the International Journal of Eating Disorders, Reilly, Gorrell, Chapa, Drury, Stalvey, Goldschmidt, and le Grange examine the widespread use of the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and its self-report version, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), in assessing eating disorder symptoms. While acknowledging the popularity of these instruments, the authors highlight important limitations—including restricted scope, psychometric shortcomings, and practical challenges such as inconsistent scoring practices and limited applicability across diverse populations. Rather than advocating for the development of entirely new measures, the authors propose building a field-wide consensus to refine existing tools and promote their broader and more consistent use. Reilly et al.'s paper is a timely and valuable contribution to ongoing conversations about assessment practices in the field. In this commentary, we extend their perspective by drawing on previous experiences in the field that support their call to action and suggest that future consensus efforts should built on international experience and collaboration, and ensure that lived experience voices are integral to the process.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"58 9","pages":"1690-1692"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EDE and EDE-Q: A Call for Field Wide International Collaboration When Revisiting a Classic, Commentary on Reilly et al. (2025)\",\"authors\":\"Paulo P. P. Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In their 2025 article in the International Journal of Eating Disorders, Reilly, Gorrell, Chapa, Drury, Stalvey, Goldschmidt, and le Grange examine the widespread use of the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and its self-report version, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), in assessing eating disorder symptoms. While acknowledging the popularity of these instruments, the authors highlight important limitations—including restricted scope, psychometric shortcomings, and practical challenges such as inconsistent scoring practices and limited applicability across diverse populations. Rather than advocating for the development of entirely new measures, the authors propose building a field-wide consensus to refine existing tools and promote their broader and more consistent use. Reilly et al.'s paper is a timely and valuable contribution to ongoing conversations about assessment practices in the field. In this commentary, we extend their perspective by drawing on previous experiences in the field that support their call to action and suggest that future consensus efforts should built on international experience and collaboration, and ensure that lived experience voices are integral to the process.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"58 9\",\"pages\":\"1690-1692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24481\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24481","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
EDE and EDE-Q: A Call for Field Wide International Collaboration When Revisiting a Classic, Commentary on Reilly et al. (2025)
In their 2025 article in the International Journal of Eating Disorders, Reilly, Gorrell, Chapa, Drury, Stalvey, Goldschmidt, and le Grange examine the widespread use of the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and its self-report version, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), in assessing eating disorder symptoms. While acknowledging the popularity of these instruments, the authors highlight important limitations—including restricted scope, psychometric shortcomings, and practical challenges such as inconsistent scoring practices and limited applicability across diverse populations. Rather than advocating for the development of entirely new measures, the authors propose building a field-wide consensus to refine existing tools and promote their broader and more consistent use. Reilly et al.'s paper is a timely and valuable contribution to ongoing conversations about assessment practices in the field. In this commentary, we extend their perspective by drawing on previous experiences in the field that support their call to action and suggest that future consensus efforts should built on international experience and collaboration, and ensure that lived experience voices are integral to the process.
期刊介绍:
Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.