研究运动单位射击率在手臂循环期间比较强度匹配等距收缩在人类。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1152/jn.00128.2025
Daniel C Basile, Alysha D Wira, Charles L Rice, Kevin E Power
{"title":"研究运动单位射击率在手臂循环期间比较强度匹配等距收缩在人类。","authors":"Daniel C Basile, Alysha D Wira, Charles L Rice, Kevin E Power","doi":"10.1152/jn.00128.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies in humans have not assessed motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) recorded from intramuscular electromyography (EMG) during a rhythmic locomotor output. Using arm cycling as a model of locomotor-generated activity, the purpose was to determine whether MUFRs differed during arm cycling compared with intensity-matched isometric contractions. We hypothesized that MUFRs would be greater during arm cycling than isometric contractions, assessed at various working intensities. Young males (<i>n</i> = 10) and females (<i>n</i> = 4) completed arm cycling bouts and isometric contractions of the elbow flexors. Indwelling fine-wire electrodes were inserted into the biceps brachii to record MUFRs during arm cycling with combinations of two power outputs (25 W and 50 W) and cadences (30 rpm and 60 rpm), and subsequently compared with intensity-matched isometric contractions. Motor unit recordings were analyzed during the flexion phase of arm cycling when biceps brachii EMG activity was high, and with the forearms in a neutral grip position. Results indicated that MUFRs were significantly higher during arm cycling compared with isometric contractions (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and MUFRs increased with greater cycling intensity (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Higher MUFRs demonstrated during arm cycling were likely influenced by greater descending drive and/or enhanced spinal motoneuron excitability, facilitated through central pattern generator (CPG)-mediated changes to intrinsic motoneuron properties. Thus, different neural control strategies are used during rhythmic locomotor output compared with isometric contractions in humans.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) during an upper-limb locomotor task have yet to be recorded in humans, and behavior of the active motor units during dynamic central pattern generator (CPG)-mediated locomotor activity is currently unknown. The present study used indwelling fine-wire electrodes to record MUFRs during arm cycling and compared the firing rates to intensity-matched isometric contractions. Results demonstrated that MUFRs were significantly higher during arm cycling, indicating different neural control strategies between locomotor outputs and isometric contractions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating motor unit firing rates during arm cycling compared with intensity-matched isometric contractions in humans.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel C Basile, Alysha D Wira, Charles L Rice, Kevin E Power\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00128.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies in humans have not assessed motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) recorded from intramuscular electromyography (EMG) during a rhythmic locomotor output. Using arm cycling as a model of locomotor-generated activity, the purpose was to determine whether MUFRs differed during arm cycling compared with intensity-matched isometric contractions. We hypothesized that MUFRs would be greater during arm cycling than isometric contractions, assessed at various working intensities. Young males (<i>n</i> = 10) and females (<i>n</i> = 4) completed arm cycling bouts and isometric contractions of the elbow flexors. Indwelling fine-wire electrodes were inserted into the biceps brachii to record MUFRs during arm cycling with combinations of two power outputs (25 W and 50 W) and cadences (30 rpm and 60 rpm), and subsequently compared with intensity-matched isometric contractions. Motor unit recordings were analyzed during the flexion phase of arm cycling when biceps brachii EMG activity was high, and with the forearms in a neutral grip position. Results indicated that MUFRs were significantly higher during arm cycling compared with isometric contractions (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and MUFRs increased with greater cycling intensity (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Higher MUFRs demonstrated during arm cycling were likely influenced by greater descending drive and/or enhanced spinal motoneuron excitability, facilitated through central pattern generator (CPG)-mediated changes to intrinsic motoneuron properties. Thus, different neural control strategies are used during rhythmic locomotor output compared with isometric contractions in humans.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) during an upper-limb locomotor task have yet to be recorded in humans, and behavior of the active motor units during dynamic central pattern generator (CPG)-mediated locomotor activity is currently unknown. The present study used indwelling fine-wire electrodes to record MUFRs during arm cycling and compared the firing rates to intensity-matched isometric contractions. Results demonstrated that MUFRs were significantly higher during arm cycling, indicating different neural control strategies between locomotor outputs and isometric contractions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"162-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00128.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00128.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类研究尚未评估有节奏运动输出时肌内肌电图(EMG)记录的运动单位放电率(MUFR)。使用手臂循环作为运动产生活动的模型,目的是确定与强度匹配的等长收缩相比,手臂循环期间的MUFR是否不同。我们假设在不同的工作强度下,MUFR在手臂循环期间比等长收缩更大。年轻男性(n=10)和女性(n=4)完成了手臂循环和肱二头肌等长收缩。在两种功率输出(25和50 W)和节奏(30和60 RPM)的组合下,将留置细丝电极插入肱二头肌,记录手臂循环期间的MUFR,随后与强度匹配的等距收缩进行比较。在手臂循环屈曲阶段,当肱二头肌肌电图活动高,前臂处于中性握力位置时,分析运动单元记录。结果表明,与等长收缩相比,在手臂循环期间MUFR明显更高(p=0.003),并且MUFR随循环强度的增加而增加(p=0.003)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating motor unit firing rates during arm cycling compared with intensity-matched isometric contractions in humans.

Studies in humans have not assessed motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) recorded from intramuscular electromyography (EMG) during a rhythmic locomotor output. Using arm cycling as a model of locomotor-generated activity, the purpose was to determine whether MUFRs differed during arm cycling compared with intensity-matched isometric contractions. We hypothesized that MUFRs would be greater during arm cycling than isometric contractions, assessed at various working intensities. Young males (n = 10) and females (n = 4) completed arm cycling bouts and isometric contractions of the elbow flexors. Indwelling fine-wire electrodes were inserted into the biceps brachii to record MUFRs during arm cycling with combinations of two power outputs (25 W and 50 W) and cadences (30 rpm and 60 rpm), and subsequently compared with intensity-matched isometric contractions. Motor unit recordings were analyzed during the flexion phase of arm cycling when biceps brachii EMG activity was high, and with the forearms in a neutral grip position. Results indicated that MUFRs were significantly higher during arm cycling compared with isometric contractions (P = 0.003), and MUFRs increased with greater cycling intensity (P < 0.001). Higher MUFRs demonstrated during arm cycling were likely influenced by greater descending drive and/or enhanced spinal motoneuron excitability, facilitated through central pattern generator (CPG)-mediated changes to intrinsic motoneuron properties. Thus, different neural control strategies are used during rhythmic locomotor output compared with isometric contractions in humans.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) during an upper-limb locomotor task have yet to be recorded in humans, and behavior of the active motor units during dynamic central pattern generator (CPG)-mediated locomotor activity is currently unknown. The present study used indwelling fine-wire electrodes to record MUFRs during arm cycling and compared the firing rates to intensity-matched isometric contractions. Results demonstrated that MUFRs were significantly higher during arm cycling, indicating different neural control strategies between locomotor outputs and isometric contractions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信