添加植物乳杆菌益生菌对胃肠道功能的影响——一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.3 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Journal of Dietary Supplements Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1080/19390211.2025.2507610
Ruma G Singh, Fumiki Aoki, Maria Rodriguez-Palmero Seuma, Meritxell Aguilo, Motohisa Washida, Jordi Espadaler-Mazo, Huda Al-Wahsh, David C Crowley, Najla Guthrie, Malkanthi Evans, Marc Moulin, Erin D Lewis
{"title":"添加植物乳杆菌益生菌对胃肠道功能的影响——一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Ruma G Singh, Fumiki Aoki, Maria Rodriguez-Palmero Seuma, Meritxell Aguilo, Motohisa Washida, Jordi Espadaler-Mazo, Huda Al-Wahsh, David C Crowley, Najla Guthrie, Malkanthi Evans, Marc Moulin, Erin D Lewis","doi":"10.1080/19390211.2025.2507610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in older adults may be associated with gut microbiota activity or composition changes. <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> strains KABP031 and KABP032 have been shown to beneficially influence the frequency of bowel movements (BMs) and nutritional status in older adults. This study investigated the efficacy of this probiotic blend on defecation/stool consistency, GI symptoms, nutrient uptake, and mental well-being in older adults with occasional constipation. Subjects 50-85 years of age with infrequent BMs, straining during defecation and hard stool consistency, were randomized to either the Probiotic or Placebo group for 84 days. Changes in bowel function, GI symptoms, and stress were assessed by the daily bowel habits diary, Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), respectively. Improvements in bowel movement frequency (<i>p</i> = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.22-2.39) and stool consistency (<i>p</i> = 0.002; 95% CI: 0.32-1.30) with the Probiotic were significantly greater compared to Placebo after 42 days. There was also significant decrease in the percentage of weekly BMs with a Bristol Stool Scale score of ≤2 with Probiotic vs. Placebo (-28.6% vs. -3.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A significantly lower proportion of participants in the Probiotic group reported moderate stress following 84 days of supplementation compared to the Placebo group (9.4% vs. 37.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.013). Further, within-group significant improvements in stool consistency and BM frequency from baseline at days 42 and 84 were observed with the Probiotic (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but not the Placebo. The findings suggest the probiotic blend alleviated constipation symptoms and improved the mental well-being in older adults with occasional constipation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry number and website: </strong>NCT04147923; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04147923.</p>","PeriodicalId":15646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dietary Supplements","volume":" ","pages":"549-570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation with <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> Strains on Gastrointestinal Tract Function - A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ruma G Singh, Fumiki Aoki, Maria Rodriguez-Palmero Seuma, Meritxell Aguilo, Motohisa Washida, Jordi Espadaler-Mazo, Huda Al-Wahsh, David C Crowley, Najla Guthrie, Malkanthi Evans, Marc Moulin, Erin D Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19390211.2025.2507610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in older adults may be associated with gut microbiota activity or composition changes. <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> strains KABP031 and KABP032 have been shown to beneficially influence the frequency of bowel movements (BMs) and nutritional status in older adults. This study investigated the efficacy of this probiotic blend on defecation/stool consistency, GI symptoms, nutrient uptake, and mental well-being in older adults with occasional constipation. Subjects 50-85 years of age with infrequent BMs, straining during defecation and hard stool consistency, were randomized to either the Probiotic or Placebo group for 84 days. Changes in bowel function, GI symptoms, and stress were assessed by the daily bowel habits diary, Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), respectively. Improvements in bowel movement frequency (<i>p</i> = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.22-2.39) and stool consistency (<i>p</i> = 0.002; 95% CI: 0.32-1.30) with the Probiotic were significantly greater compared to Placebo after 42 days. There was also significant decrease in the percentage of weekly BMs with a Bristol Stool Scale score of ≤2 with Probiotic vs. Placebo (-28.6% vs. -3.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A significantly lower proportion of participants in the Probiotic group reported moderate stress following 84 days of supplementation compared to the Placebo group (9.4% vs. 37.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.013). Further, within-group significant improvements in stool consistency and BM frequency from baseline at days 42 and 84 were observed with the Probiotic (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but not the Placebo. The findings suggest the probiotic blend alleviated constipation symptoms and improved the mental well-being in older adults with occasional constipation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry number and website: </strong>NCT04147923; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04147923.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dietary Supplements\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"549-570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dietary Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19390211.2025.2507610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dietary Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19390211.2025.2507610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人胃肠道功能障碍可能与肠道菌群活性或组成变化有关。植物乳杆菌菌株KABP031和KABP032已被证明对老年人排便频率(BMs)和营养状况有有益影响。本研究调查了这种益生菌混合物对偶尔便秘的老年人排便/大便一致性、胃肠道症状、营养吸收和精神健康的影响。年龄在50-85岁之间且不常发生脑转移,排便时紧张且大便坚硬的受试者被随机分为益生菌组或安慰剂组,为期84天。分别通过每日排便习惯日记、胃肠道症状评定量表(GSRS)和感知应激量表(PSS)评估肠功能、胃肠道症状和应激的变化。改善排便频率(p = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.22-2.39)和大便一致性(p = 0.002;95% CI: 0.32-1.30), 42天后,与安慰剂相比,益生菌组显著增加。与安慰剂相比,益生菌组布里斯托尔粪便量表评分≤2的周BMs百分比也显著降低(-28.6% vs -3.2%, p p = 0.013)。此外,在第42天和第84天,观察到益生菌组内粪便一致性和BM频率较基线有显著改善(p临床试验注册号和网站:NCT04147923;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04147923。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Strains on Gastrointestinal Tract Function - A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in older adults may be associated with gut microbiota activity or composition changes. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains KABP031 and KABP032 have been shown to beneficially influence the frequency of bowel movements (BMs) and nutritional status in older adults. This study investigated the efficacy of this probiotic blend on defecation/stool consistency, GI symptoms, nutrient uptake, and mental well-being in older adults with occasional constipation. Subjects 50-85 years of age with infrequent BMs, straining during defecation and hard stool consistency, were randomized to either the Probiotic or Placebo group for 84 days. Changes in bowel function, GI symptoms, and stress were assessed by the daily bowel habits diary, Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), respectively. Improvements in bowel movement frequency (p = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.22-2.39) and stool consistency (p = 0.002; 95% CI: 0.32-1.30) with the Probiotic were significantly greater compared to Placebo after 42 days. There was also significant decrease in the percentage of weekly BMs with a Bristol Stool Scale score of ≤2 with Probiotic vs. Placebo (-28.6% vs. -3.2%, p < 0.001). A significantly lower proportion of participants in the Probiotic group reported moderate stress following 84 days of supplementation compared to the Placebo group (9.4% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.013). Further, within-group significant improvements in stool consistency and BM frequency from baseline at days 42 and 84 were observed with the Probiotic (p < 0.001), but not the Placebo. The findings suggest the probiotic blend alleviated constipation symptoms and improved the mental well-being in older adults with occasional constipation.

Clinical trial registry number and website: NCT04147923; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04147923.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dietary Supplements
Journal of Dietary Supplements Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dietary Supplements (formerly the Journal of Nutraceuticals, Functional & Medical Foods) has been retitled to reflect the bold departure from a traditional scientific journal presentation to a leading voice for anyone with a stake in dietary supplements. The journal addresses important issues that meet the broad range of interests from researchers, regulators, marketers, educators, and health professionals from academic, governmental, industry, healthcare, public health, and consumer education sectors. This vital tool not only presents scientific information but interprets it - helping you more readily pass it on to your students, patients, clients, or company.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信