upadacitinib与阿达木单抗在类风湿关节炎和心血管疾病较高或较低风险患者中的获益-风险分析

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Gerd R Burmester, Eduardo Mysler, Peter Taylor, Stephen Hall, Bettina Wick-Urban, Andrew Garrison, Tianming Gao, Irina Fish, Sander Strengholt, Roy Fleischmann
{"title":"upadacitinib与阿达木单抗在类风湿关节炎和心血管疾病较高或较低风险患者中的获益-风险分析","authors":"Gerd R Burmester, Eduardo Mysler, Peter Taylor, Stephen Hall, Bettina Wick-Urban, Andrew Garrison, Tianming Gao, Irina Fish, Sander Strengholt, Roy Fleischmann","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the risks and benefits of upadacitinib 15 mg vs adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate based on cardiovascular (CV) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In SELECT-COMPARE, patients received upadacitinib 15 mg, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg every other week, with background methotrexate. This post hoc analysis assessed patients with lower (age <65 years; no CV risk factors) and higher CV risk (age ≥65 years and/or ≥1 CV risk factor). Safety and efficacy outcomes were compared between upadacitinib and adalimumab over the short term (~6 months) and long term (5 years) based on CV risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 211 lower-risk patients (upadacitinib, n=129; adalimumab, n=82) and 767 higher-risk patients (upadacitinib, n=522; adalimumab, n=245). Rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), major adverse cardiovascular event and venous thromboembolism were comparable between upadacitinib and adalimumab in both risk groups but numerically higher in the higher-risk group. Upadacitinib showed higher rates of herpes zoster versus adalimumab in both risk groups and numerically higher rates of serious infection and NMSC in the higher-risk group. Upadacitinib demonstrated consistently better efficacy outcomes, including 28-joint Disease Activity Score (C reactive protein) <2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index remission and Boolean remission at 6 months, which were generally maintained through 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regardless of baseline CV risk, upadacitinib demonstrated comparable safety to adalimumab, except for higher rates of herpes zoster in both CV risk groups and NMSC and serious infections in the higher-risk group. Upadacitinib consistently showed better clinical and functional outcomes than adalimumab. The benefit-risk profile of upadacitinib in RA patients was favourable, independent of CV risk category, in both short and long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefit-risk analysis of upadacitinib versus adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and higher or lower risk of cardiovascular disease.\",\"authors\":\"Gerd R Burmester, Eduardo Mysler, Peter Taylor, Stephen Hall, Bettina Wick-Urban, Andrew Garrison, Tianming Gao, Irina Fish, Sander Strengholt, Roy Fleischmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the risks and benefits of upadacitinib 15 mg vs adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate based on cardiovascular (CV) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In SELECT-COMPARE, patients received upadacitinib 15 mg, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg every other week, with background methotrexate. This post hoc analysis assessed patients with lower (age <65 years; no CV risk factors) and higher CV risk (age ≥65 years and/or ≥1 CV risk factor). Safety and efficacy outcomes were compared between upadacitinib and adalimumab over the short term (~6 months) and long term (5 years) based on CV risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 211 lower-risk patients (upadacitinib, n=129; adalimumab, n=82) and 767 higher-risk patients (upadacitinib, n=522; adalimumab, n=245). Rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), major adverse cardiovascular event and venous thromboembolism were comparable between upadacitinib and adalimumab in both risk groups but numerically higher in the higher-risk group. Upadacitinib showed higher rates of herpes zoster versus adalimumab in both risk groups and numerically higher rates of serious infection and NMSC in the higher-risk group. Upadacitinib demonstrated consistently better efficacy outcomes, including 28-joint Disease Activity Score (C reactive protein) <2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index remission and Boolean remission at 6 months, which were generally maintained through 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regardless of baseline CV risk, upadacitinib demonstrated comparable safety to adalimumab, except for higher rates of herpes zoster in both CV risk groups and NMSC and serious infections in the higher-risk group. Upadacitinib consistently showed better clinical and functional outcomes than adalimumab. The benefit-risk profile of upadacitinib in RA patients was favourable, independent of CV risk category, in both short and long term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMD Open\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMD Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005371\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估upadacitinib 15mg与阿达木单抗在基于心血管(CV)风险对甲氨蝶呤反应不足的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者中的风险和获益。方法:在SELECT-COMPARE中,患者每隔一周接受upadacitinib 15mg,安慰剂或阿达木单抗40mg,背景治疗为甲氨蝶呤。这项事后分析评估了年龄较低的患者。结果:该研究包括211名低风险患者(upadacitinib, n=129;阿达木单抗,n=82)和767名高危患者(upadacitinib, n=522;adalimumab, n = 245)。在两个危险组中,upadacitinib和阿达木单抗的恶性肿瘤(不包括非黑色素瘤皮肤癌)、主要不良心血管事件和静脉血栓栓塞的发生率相当,但在高危组中数字更高。与阿达木单抗相比,Upadacitinib在两个危险组中显示出更高的带状疱疹发生率,在高风险组中显示出更高的严重感染和NMSC发生率。结论:无论基线CV风险如何,Upadacitinib显示出与阿达木单抗相当的安全性,除了CV风险组和NMSC的带状疱疹发生率更高以及高风险组的严重感染发生率更高。Upadacitinib始终表现出比阿达木单抗更好的临床和功能结果。无论短期还是长期,upadacitinib在RA患者中的获益-风险概况都是有利的,独立于CV风险类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefit-risk analysis of upadacitinib versus adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and higher or lower risk of cardiovascular disease.

Objectives: Evaluate the risks and benefits of upadacitinib 15 mg vs adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate based on cardiovascular (CV) risk.

Methods: In SELECT-COMPARE, patients received upadacitinib 15 mg, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg every other week, with background methotrexate. This post hoc analysis assessed patients with lower (age <65 years; no CV risk factors) and higher CV risk (age ≥65 years and/or ≥1 CV risk factor). Safety and efficacy outcomes were compared between upadacitinib and adalimumab over the short term (~6 months) and long term (5 years) based on CV risk.

Results: The study included 211 lower-risk patients (upadacitinib, n=129; adalimumab, n=82) and 767 higher-risk patients (upadacitinib, n=522; adalimumab, n=245). Rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), major adverse cardiovascular event and venous thromboembolism were comparable between upadacitinib and adalimumab in both risk groups but numerically higher in the higher-risk group. Upadacitinib showed higher rates of herpes zoster versus adalimumab in both risk groups and numerically higher rates of serious infection and NMSC in the higher-risk group. Upadacitinib demonstrated consistently better efficacy outcomes, including 28-joint Disease Activity Score (C reactive protein) <2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index remission and Boolean remission at 6 months, which were generally maintained through 5 years.

Conclusions: Regardless of baseline CV risk, upadacitinib demonstrated comparable safety to adalimumab, except for higher rates of herpes zoster in both CV risk groups and NMSC and serious infections in the higher-risk group. Upadacitinib consistently showed better clinical and functional outcomes than adalimumab. The benefit-risk profile of upadacitinib in RA patients was favourable, independent of CV risk category, in both short and long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信