2010-2020年全国大学生足球甲级联赛男队主场优势与技战术表现指标研究

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Lars Popp, Sergio Caicedo-Parada, Jose M Palao
{"title":"2010-2020年全国大学生足球甲级联赛男队主场优势与技战术表现指标研究","authors":"Lars Popp, Sergio Caicedo-Parada, Jose M Palao","doi":"10.1177/00315125251343451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to analyze the evolution of home advantage (HA) effect in NCAA D1 men's soccer (2010-2020) in relation to the level of a team. <b>Research Design:</b> The studied variables were result of the game, location of the game (home, away or neutral), winning percentage, the level of the team according to its winning percentage (high level, mid-level, or low level), the level of the opponent team, type of confrontation considering the level of the teams (1vs1, 1vs2, 1vs3, 2vs2, 2vs3, and 3vs3), team home points advantage, team goals, assists, shot attempts, shots on goal, efficacy (percentage of shots scored), penalties, corners, fouls, yellow cards, and red cards. <b>Sample:</b> The sample was all 39,397 NCAA Division 1 men's soccer matches from the 2010-2011 season to the 2019-2020 season. <b>Results:</b> Regardless of the strength of the team (level of team and type of confrontation), teams won significantly more games when playing at home compared to playing away. Comparing home point advantage, low level teams had a significantly higher home advantage effect than middle level teams. When playing at home, teams had significantly more goals, assists, shot attempts, shots on goal, and corners, while conceding fewer goals. All the differences found had a small effect size. The fact that neutral games didn't evince any significant differences, further supports the notion of the HA-effect. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study confirms the HA effect and presents reference values according to team strength and confrontations regarding win-loss-tie, home advantage points, and game statistics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251343451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home Advantage and Technical-Tactical Performance Indicators in Male Soccer College Teams (NCAA Division I 2010-2020).\",\"authors\":\"Lars Popp, Sergio Caicedo-Parada, Jose M Palao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00315125251343451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to analyze the evolution of home advantage (HA) effect in NCAA D1 men's soccer (2010-2020) in relation to the level of a team. <b>Research Design:</b> The studied variables were result of the game, location of the game (home, away or neutral), winning percentage, the level of the team according to its winning percentage (high level, mid-level, or low level), the level of the opponent team, type of confrontation considering the level of the teams (1vs1, 1vs2, 1vs3, 2vs2, 2vs3, and 3vs3), team home points advantage, team goals, assists, shot attempts, shots on goal, efficacy (percentage of shots scored), penalties, corners, fouls, yellow cards, and red cards. <b>Sample:</b> The sample was all 39,397 NCAA Division 1 men's soccer matches from the 2010-2011 season to the 2019-2020 season. <b>Results:</b> Regardless of the strength of the team (level of team and type of confrontation), teams won significantly more games when playing at home compared to playing away. Comparing home point advantage, low level teams had a significantly higher home advantage effect than middle level teams. When playing at home, teams had significantly more goals, assists, shot attempts, shots on goal, and corners, while conceding fewer goals. All the differences found had a small effect size. The fact that neutral games didn't evince any significant differences, further supports the notion of the HA-effect. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study confirms the HA effect and presents reference values according to team strength and confrontations regarding win-loss-tie, home advantage points, and game statistics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"315125251343451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251343451\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251343451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是分析2010-2020年NCAA D1男子足球主场优势(HA)效应的演变与球队水平的关系。研究设计:研究的变量包括比赛结果、比赛地点(主场、客场或中立)、胜率、球队的胜率水平(高、中、低)、对手球队的水平、考虑球队水平的对抗类型(1vs1、1vs2、1vs3、2vs2、2vs3和3vs3)、球队主场分优势、球队进球、助攻、射门次数、射门次数、效率(射门百分比)、点球、角球、犯规、黄牌、还有红牌。样本:样本为2010-2011赛季至2019-2020赛季的所有39,397场NCAA一级联赛男子足球比赛。结果:无论球队的实力(球队的水平和对抗类型)如何,球队在主场比赛时比在客场比赛时赢得更多的比赛。对比主场优势,低水平球队主场优势效应显著高于中等水平球队。在主场比赛时,球队的进球、助攻、射门次数、射门次数和角球次数都明显更多,而失球次数则更少。所有发现的差异都有一个小的效应值。中立游戏没有表现出任何显著的差异,这一事实进一步支持了ha效应的概念。结论:本研究证实了HA效应,并根据球队实力和对抗情况,在胜负平局、主场优势积分、比赛统计等方面具有一定的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home Advantage and Technical-Tactical Performance Indicators in Male Soccer College Teams (NCAA Division I 2010-2020).

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the evolution of home advantage (HA) effect in NCAA D1 men's soccer (2010-2020) in relation to the level of a team. Research Design: The studied variables were result of the game, location of the game (home, away or neutral), winning percentage, the level of the team according to its winning percentage (high level, mid-level, or low level), the level of the opponent team, type of confrontation considering the level of the teams (1vs1, 1vs2, 1vs3, 2vs2, 2vs3, and 3vs3), team home points advantage, team goals, assists, shot attempts, shots on goal, efficacy (percentage of shots scored), penalties, corners, fouls, yellow cards, and red cards. Sample: The sample was all 39,397 NCAA Division 1 men's soccer matches from the 2010-2011 season to the 2019-2020 season. Results: Regardless of the strength of the team (level of team and type of confrontation), teams won significantly more games when playing at home compared to playing away. Comparing home point advantage, low level teams had a significantly higher home advantage effect than middle level teams. When playing at home, teams had significantly more goals, assists, shot attempts, shots on goal, and corners, while conceding fewer goals. All the differences found had a small effect size. The fact that neutral games didn't evince any significant differences, further supports the notion of the HA-effect. Conclusions: This study confirms the HA effect and presents reference values according to team strength and confrontations regarding win-loss-tie, home advantage points, and game statistics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信