富血小板血浆与膝神经射频消融术治疗膝骨关节炎的安全性和有效性:一项开放标签、前瞻性、随机临床试验。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-05-01
Shahzad Anwar, Swarnima Vardhan, Abhinav Aggarwal, Sulayman Waquar, Madhurima Vardhan, Gull A Rukh Shoukat, Sudhir A Diwan, Annu Navani
{"title":"富血小板血浆与膝神经射频消融术治疗膝骨关节炎的安全性和有效性:一项开放标签、前瞻性、随机临床试验。","authors":"Shahzad Anwar, Swarnima Vardhan, Abhinav Aggarwal, Sulayman Waquar, Madhurima Vardhan, Gull A Rukh Shoukat, Sudhir A Diwan, Annu Navani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis is the most prevalent joint disorder, marked by significant pain, reduced functionality, and diminished quality of life. The prevalence of chronic knee osteoarthritis is increasing as the population ages. Minimally invasive therapeutic interventions, including platelet-rich plasma and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves, have demonstrated substantial efficacy in alleviating pain in these patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intraarticular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection and genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) in alleviating pain associated with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An open-label, prospective, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted on 200 patients with Grade II-III knee osteoarthritis. Of these, 100 patients were assigned to the PRP group, receiving a single intraarticular PRP injection, while the remaining patients in the GNRFA group underwent radiofrequency ablation of the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves following a successful diagnostic block. Outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at the baseline and subsequently at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, one year, and 2 years post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAS scores were significantly lower in the PRP group than in the GNRFA group at 12 and 24 months, with P-values < 0.001. The PRP group also exhibited statistically significant reductions in ODI scores at all pre-specified time points. No adverse effects were reported in either treatment group.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study did not include a control group, and the assessment of efficacy was primarily based on clinical scores without evaluating structural changes through MRI. Additionally, physical and analgesic therapies were not considered in the data collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis, intraarticular platelet-rich plasma therapy may offer superior sustained pain relief and a lower disability index compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 3","pages":"207-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation in Knee Osteoarthritis: An Open-Label, Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shahzad Anwar, Swarnima Vardhan, Abhinav Aggarwal, Sulayman Waquar, Madhurima Vardhan, Gull A Rukh Shoukat, Sudhir A Diwan, Annu Navani\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis is the most prevalent joint disorder, marked by significant pain, reduced functionality, and diminished quality of life. The prevalence of chronic knee osteoarthritis is increasing as the population ages. Minimally invasive therapeutic interventions, including platelet-rich plasma and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves, have demonstrated substantial efficacy in alleviating pain in these patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intraarticular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection and genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) in alleviating pain associated with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An open-label, prospective, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted on 200 patients with Grade II-III knee osteoarthritis. Of these, 100 patients were assigned to the PRP group, receiving a single intraarticular PRP injection, while the remaining patients in the GNRFA group underwent radiofrequency ablation of the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves following a successful diagnostic block. Outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at the baseline and subsequently at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, one year, and 2 years post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAS scores were significantly lower in the PRP group than in the GNRFA group at 12 and 24 months, with P-values < 0.001. The PRP group also exhibited statistically significant reductions in ODI scores at all pre-specified time points. No adverse effects were reported in either treatment group.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study did not include a control group, and the assessment of efficacy was primarily based on clinical scores without evaluating structural changes through MRI. Additionally, physical and analgesic therapies were not considered in the data collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis, intraarticular platelet-rich plasma therapy may offer superior sustained pain relief and a lower disability index compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"207-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨关节炎是最常见的关节疾病,其特征是明显的疼痛、功能下降和生活质量下降。慢性膝骨关节炎的患病率随着人口老龄化而增加。微创治疗干预,包括富血小板血浆和膝神经射频消融,在缓解这些患者的疼痛方面已经证明了实质性的疗效。目的:本研究的目的是比较关节内富血小板血浆(PRP)注射和膝神经射频消融术(GNRFA)减轻膝关节骨关节炎相关疼痛的疗效。研究设计:一项开放标签、前瞻性、随机临床试验。环境:大学医院。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、开放标签的临床试验对200例II-III级膝骨关节炎患者进行了研究。其中,100名患者被分配到PRP组,接受单次关节内PRP注射,而GNRFA组的其余患者在成功诊断阻断后接受内侧上神经、外侧上神经和内侧间神经的射频消融。在基线和干预后2周、3个月、6个月、1年和2年,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估结果。结果:PRP组12个月和24个月VAS评分显著低于GNRFA组,p值< 0.001。PRP组在所有预先指定的时间点上ODI得分也有统计学上的显著下降。两组均无不良反应。局限性:该研究未纳入对照组,疗效评估主要基于临床评分,未通过MRI评估结构变化。此外,在数据收集中没有考虑物理和镇痛治疗。结论:对于慢性膝骨关节炎患者,与常规膝神经射频消融术相比,关节内富血小板血浆治疗可以提供更好的持续疼痛缓解和更低的残疾指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation in Knee Osteoarthritis: An Open-Label, Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial.

Background: Osteoarthritis is the most prevalent joint disorder, marked by significant pain, reduced functionality, and diminished quality of life. The prevalence of chronic knee osteoarthritis is increasing as the population ages. Minimally invasive therapeutic interventions, including platelet-rich plasma and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves, have demonstrated substantial efficacy in alleviating pain in these patients.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intraarticular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection and genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) in alleviating pain associated with knee osteoarthritis.

Study design: An open-label, prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Setting: A university hospital.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted on 200 patients with Grade II-III knee osteoarthritis. Of these, 100 patients were assigned to the PRP group, receiving a single intraarticular PRP injection, while the remaining patients in the GNRFA group underwent radiofrequency ablation of the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves following a successful diagnostic block. Outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at the baseline and subsequently at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, one year, and 2 years post-intervention.

Results: VAS scores were significantly lower in the PRP group than in the GNRFA group at 12 and 24 months, with P-values < 0.001. The PRP group also exhibited statistically significant reductions in ODI scores at all pre-specified time points. No adverse effects were reported in either treatment group.

Limitations: The study did not include a control group, and the assessment of efficacy was primarily based on clinical scores without evaluating structural changes through MRI. Additionally, physical and analgesic therapies were not considered in the data collection.

Conclusion: For patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis, intraarticular platelet-rich plasma therapy may offer superior sustained pain relief and a lower disability index compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信