轻度创伤性脑损伤的疼痛管理:中枢致敏作为一个多专业挑战。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-05-01
Christopher File, Remi Nader, Alejandro Villasante-Tezanos, Rowaid Ahmed, Sean Pappolla, Fauwad Ahmed, Ernesto G Miranda-Morales, Yingxin Zhao, Xiang Fang, Alan D Kaye, Miguel A Pappolla
{"title":"轻度创伤性脑损伤的疼痛管理:中枢致敏作为一个多专业挑战。","authors":"Christopher File, Remi Nader, Alejandro Villasante-Tezanos, Rowaid Ahmed, Sean Pappolla, Fauwad Ahmed, Ernesto G Miranda-Morales, Yingxin Zhao, Xiang Fang, Alan D Kaye, Miguel A Pappolla","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies indicate that approximately two-thirds of individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) will develop chronic pain, which is often debilitating and a primary factor in long-term disability. Patients with mTBI can suffer concurrently from multiple pain types, such as chronic neuropathic (central or peripheral), nociceptive, or nociplastic pain; however, the prevailing pain types in mTBI patients remain undetermined. This knowledge void limits the formulation of effective therapies for mTBI-related pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify the predominant pain mechanism in patients who had developed persistent post-concussive syndrome (PPCS) after the onset of their mTBI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Our study focused on a cohort of mTBI patients with PPCS and chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at an outpatient neurology clinic from January 2020 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients who met the criteria for post-mTBI PPCS. Exclusion criteria consisted of a history of chronic pain before the injury, being in the acute/subacute stage (fewer than 90 days after receiving the injury), or the presence of any other neurological comorbidities. We employed a range of diagnostic instruments, including a clinical research tool to measure the degree of central sensitization. Since patients with mTBI often show normal structural imaging, we used several neurophysiological techniques, including evoked potentials, videonystagmography, and quantitative electroencephalography, to confirm the presence of brain pathology objectively. The severity of the post-concussive symptoms was measured using the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. Central sensitization was assessed using the Widespread Pain Index and the Symptom Severity Index. The correlation between concussion severity and widespread pain was analyzed statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 223 initial mTBI patients, 67 met the study criteria. The main reasons for exclusions included pre-existing chronic pain or other neurological diagnoses. Among the patients, 39 (58%) were male, averaging 45.7 years of age (range: 20-72). Ethnicity distribution was as follows: 26 (39%) Hispanic, 22 (33%) White, 12 (18%) Black or African American, and 7 (10%) Asian or Pacific Islander. We found that patients with PPCS exhibited high levels of central sensitization, highlighting its critical role in the pathophysiology of chronic pain post-mTBI. We observed a significant correlation between the extent of central sensitization and the presence of non-painful symptoms, suggesting shared neuropathological processes between chronic pain and other PPCS manifestations.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This project was a retrospective study, which made it subject to limitations. Also, the measures used to assess some variables were self-reported, subjecting the data to recall bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed that high levels of central sensitization were universally present in the cohort studied and should be considered the primary therapeutic target in managing chronic post-mTBI pain. Therefore, chronic pain in this population is likely driven by central nervous system pathology that contributes to both the pain experience and other post-concussive symptomatology. A significant clinical implication of our study is that patients displaying high levels of central sensitization often report severe pain in discrete body parts, leading clinicians to mistakenly focus on treating the issue with antinociceptive therapies or interventional procedures that are frequently ineffective.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 3","pages":"231-240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Management in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Central Sensitization as a Multispecialty Challenge.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher File, Remi Nader, Alejandro Villasante-Tezanos, Rowaid Ahmed, Sean Pappolla, Fauwad Ahmed, Ernesto G Miranda-Morales, Yingxin Zhao, Xiang Fang, Alan D Kaye, Miguel A Pappolla\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies indicate that approximately two-thirds of individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) will develop chronic pain, which is often debilitating and a primary factor in long-term disability. Patients with mTBI can suffer concurrently from multiple pain types, such as chronic neuropathic (central or peripheral), nociceptive, or nociplastic pain; however, the prevailing pain types in mTBI patients remain undetermined. This knowledge void limits the formulation of effective therapies for mTBI-related pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify the predominant pain mechanism in patients who had developed persistent post-concussive syndrome (PPCS) after the onset of their mTBI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Our study focused on a cohort of mTBI patients with PPCS and chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at an outpatient neurology clinic from January 2020 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients who met the criteria for post-mTBI PPCS. Exclusion criteria consisted of a history of chronic pain before the injury, being in the acute/subacute stage (fewer than 90 days after receiving the injury), or the presence of any other neurological comorbidities. We employed a range of diagnostic instruments, including a clinical research tool to measure the degree of central sensitization. Since patients with mTBI often show normal structural imaging, we used several neurophysiological techniques, including evoked potentials, videonystagmography, and quantitative electroencephalography, to confirm the presence of brain pathology objectively. The severity of the post-concussive symptoms was measured using the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. Central sensitization was assessed using the Widespread Pain Index and the Symptom Severity Index. The correlation between concussion severity and widespread pain was analyzed statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 223 initial mTBI patients, 67 met the study criteria. The main reasons for exclusions included pre-existing chronic pain or other neurological diagnoses. Among the patients, 39 (58%) were male, averaging 45.7 years of age (range: 20-72). Ethnicity distribution was as follows: 26 (39%) Hispanic, 22 (33%) White, 12 (18%) Black or African American, and 7 (10%) Asian or Pacific Islander. We found that patients with PPCS exhibited high levels of central sensitization, highlighting its critical role in the pathophysiology of chronic pain post-mTBI. We observed a significant correlation between the extent of central sensitization and the presence of non-painful symptoms, suggesting shared neuropathological processes between chronic pain and other PPCS manifestations.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This project was a retrospective study, which made it subject to limitations. Also, the measures used to assess some variables were self-reported, subjecting the data to recall bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed that high levels of central sensitization were universally present in the cohort studied and should be considered the primary therapeutic target in managing chronic post-mTBI pain. Therefore, chronic pain in this population is likely driven by central nervous system pathology that contributes to both the pain experience and other post-concussive symptomatology. A significant clinical implication of our study is that patients displaying high levels of central sensitization often report severe pain in discrete body parts, leading clinicians to mistakenly focus on treating the issue with antinociceptive therapies or interventional procedures that are frequently ineffective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"231-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:几项研究表明,大约三分之二的轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者会出现慢性疼痛,这通常会使人虚弱,是导致长期残疾的主要因素。mTBI患者可同时患有多种疼痛类型,如慢性神经性(中枢或外周)、伤害性或伤害性疼痛;然而,mTBI患者的主要疼痛类型仍未确定。这一知识空白限制了mtbi相关疼痛的有效治疗方法的制定。目的:我们旨在确定mTBI发作后出现持续性脑震荡后综合征(PPCS)的患者的主要疼痛机制。研究设计:我们按照加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南进行了一项回顾性观察性研究。我们的研究重点是一组伴有PPCS和慢性疼痛的mTBI患者。环境:本研究于2020年1月至2023年12月在一家神经病学门诊诊所进行。方法:研究纳入符合mtbi后PPCS标准的患者。排除标准包括损伤前有慢性疼痛史,处于急性/亚急性期(受伤后少于90天),或存在任何其他神经系统合并症。我们采用了一系列的诊断工具,包括临床研究工具来测量中枢致敏程度。由于mTBI患者通常表现为正常的结构成像,我们使用了几种神经生理学技术,包括诱发电位、视频震图和定量脑电图,以客观地证实脑病理的存在。使用Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷测量脑震荡后症状的严重程度。采用广泛疼痛指数和症状严重程度指数评估中枢致敏性。对脑震荡严重程度与广泛性疼痛的相关性进行统计学分析。结果:223例mTBI患者中,67例符合研究标准。排除的主要原因包括先前存在的慢性疼痛或其他神经学诊断。男性39例(58%),平均45.7岁(年龄范围:20 ~ 72岁)。种族分布如下:西班牙裔26人(39%),白人22人(33%),黑人或非裔美国人12人(18%),亚洲或太平洋岛民7人(10%)。我们发现PPCS患者表现出高水平的中枢致敏,突出了其在mtbi后慢性疼痛病理生理中的关键作用。我们观察到中枢致敏程度与非疼痛症状之间存在显著相关性,表明慢性疼痛和其他PPCS表现之间存在共同的神经病理过程。局限性:本项目为回顾性研究,存在一定的局限性。此外,用于评估某些变量的措施是自我报告的,使数据受到回忆偏差的影响。结论:我们发现在研究的队列中普遍存在高水平的中枢致敏,并且应该被认为是治疗慢性mtbi后疼痛的主要治疗靶点。因此,这一人群的慢性疼痛可能是由中枢神经系统病理驱动的,中枢神经系统病理有助于疼痛体验和其他脑震荡后症状。我们的研究的一个重要的临床意义是,表现出高水平中枢致敏的患者经常报告在不同的身体部位出现严重疼痛,导致临床医生错误地将注意力集中在用抗伤害性治疗或介入治疗上,而这些治疗方法往往无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain Management in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Central Sensitization as a Multispecialty Challenge.

Background: Several studies indicate that approximately two-thirds of individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) will develop chronic pain, which is often debilitating and a primary factor in long-term disability. Patients with mTBI can suffer concurrently from multiple pain types, such as chronic neuropathic (central or peripheral), nociceptive, or nociplastic pain; however, the prevailing pain types in mTBI patients remain undetermined. This knowledge void limits the formulation of effective therapies for mTBI-related pain.

Objective: We aimed to identify the predominant pain mechanism in patients who had developed persistent post-concussive syndrome (PPCS) after the onset of their mTBI.

Study design: We conducted a retrospective observational study following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Our study focused on a cohort of mTBI patients with PPCS and chronic pain.

Setting: This study was conducted at an outpatient neurology clinic from January 2020 to December 2023.

Methods: The study included patients who met the criteria for post-mTBI PPCS. Exclusion criteria consisted of a history of chronic pain before the injury, being in the acute/subacute stage (fewer than 90 days after receiving the injury), or the presence of any other neurological comorbidities. We employed a range of diagnostic instruments, including a clinical research tool to measure the degree of central sensitization. Since patients with mTBI often show normal structural imaging, we used several neurophysiological techniques, including evoked potentials, videonystagmography, and quantitative electroencephalography, to confirm the presence of brain pathology objectively. The severity of the post-concussive symptoms was measured using the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. Central sensitization was assessed using the Widespread Pain Index and the Symptom Severity Index. The correlation between concussion severity and widespread pain was analyzed statistically.

Results: Out of 223 initial mTBI patients, 67 met the study criteria. The main reasons for exclusions included pre-existing chronic pain or other neurological diagnoses. Among the patients, 39 (58%) were male, averaging 45.7 years of age (range: 20-72). Ethnicity distribution was as follows: 26 (39%) Hispanic, 22 (33%) White, 12 (18%) Black or African American, and 7 (10%) Asian or Pacific Islander. We found that patients with PPCS exhibited high levels of central sensitization, highlighting its critical role in the pathophysiology of chronic pain post-mTBI. We observed a significant correlation between the extent of central sensitization and the presence of non-painful symptoms, suggesting shared neuropathological processes between chronic pain and other PPCS manifestations.

Limitations: This project was a retrospective study, which made it subject to limitations. Also, the measures used to assess some variables were self-reported, subjecting the data to recall bias.

Conclusion: We showed that high levels of central sensitization were universally present in the cohort studied and should be considered the primary therapeutic target in managing chronic post-mTBI pain. Therefore, chronic pain in this population is likely driven by central nervous system pathology that contributes to both the pain experience and other post-concussive symptomatology. A significant clinical implication of our study is that patients displaying high levels of central sensitization often report severe pain in discrete body parts, leading clinicians to mistakenly focus on treating the issue with antinociceptive therapies or interventional procedures that are frequently ineffective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信