蓝光百分比和二氧化碳浓度对室内垂直繁殖系统中菊花和海棠插枝水分状况和生长的影响

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 HORTICULTURE
Sofía Gómez, Celina Gómez
{"title":"蓝光百分比和二氧化碳浓度对室内垂直繁殖系统中菊花和海棠插枝水分状况和生长的影响","authors":"Sofía Gómez,&nbsp;Celina Gómez","doi":"10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managing environmental conditions to limit water loss of cuttings during the initial propagation phase (“acclimation”) is critical. Using chrysanthemum (<em>Chrysanthemum indicum</em>) and begonia (<em>Begonia × hiemalis</em>) cuttings, our objectives were to characterize 1) short-term effects of blue light [15 % to 60 % at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 70 µmol·m<sup>–</sup><sup>2</sup>·s<sup>–1</sup>] on water use (Experiment 1); and 2) short- and long-term effects on water use and growth of cuttings acclimated under two blue-light treatments [21 % (21B) or 45 % (45B)] at two carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations (ambient or high at ∼500 or 1200 μmol·mol<sup>–1</sup>, respectively) (Experiment 2). Results from Experiment 1 generally showed that increasing blue light increased water loss and water uptake by unrooted cuttings. However, no differences were measured in stomatal conductance (<em>g<sub>s</sub></em>) or transpiration (<em>E</em>), suggesting that stomata may be unresponsive to blue light during acclimation. In contrast, increasing blue light linearly increased <em>g<sub>s</sub></em> and <em>E</em> of rooted begonia cuttings, but no differences were measured in water use. There were few growth differences in response to blue light at the two CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations evaluated in Experiment 2, suggesting that cuttings may be more responsive to some environmental stimuli after initial root development. Various responses were species-specific. For example, begonia cuttings were shorter and produced smaller leaves under 45B than 21B when acclimated under high CO<sub>2</sub>. In contrast, chrysanthemum cuttings were slightly taller under 45B and high CO<sub>2</sub> but were otherwise generally unresponsive to blue light. Evapotranspiration only increased in response to blue light when begonia cuttings were acclimated under high CO<sub>2</sub>. Overall, our findings show that blue-light percentage and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration may not have large effects on rooting and growth of ornamental cuttings during acclimation, but some physiological and water-use differences can be expected, particularly under different blue-light percentages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21679,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Horticulturae","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 114201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of blue-light percentage and carbon dioxide concentration on the water status and growth of chrysanthemum and begonia cuttings in vertical indoor propagation systems\",\"authors\":\"Sofía Gómez,&nbsp;Celina Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Managing environmental conditions to limit water loss of cuttings during the initial propagation phase (“acclimation”) is critical. Using chrysanthemum (<em>Chrysanthemum indicum</em>) and begonia (<em>Begonia × hiemalis</em>) cuttings, our objectives were to characterize 1) short-term effects of blue light [15 % to 60 % at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 70 µmol·m<sup>–</sup><sup>2</sup>·s<sup>–1</sup>] on water use (Experiment 1); and 2) short- and long-term effects on water use and growth of cuttings acclimated under two blue-light treatments [21 % (21B) or 45 % (45B)] at two carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations (ambient or high at ∼500 or 1200 μmol·mol<sup>–1</sup>, respectively) (Experiment 2). Results from Experiment 1 generally showed that increasing blue light increased water loss and water uptake by unrooted cuttings. However, no differences were measured in stomatal conductance (<em>g<sub>s</sub></em>) or transpiration (<em>E</em>), suggesting that stomata may be unresponsive to blue light during acclimation. In contrast, increasing blue light linearly increased <em>g<sub>s</sub></em> and <em>E</em> of rooted begonia cuttings, but no differences were measured in water use. There were few growth differences in response to blue light at the two CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations evaluated in Experiment 2, suggesting that cuttings may be more responsive to some environmental stimuli after initial root development. Various responses were species-specific. For example, begonia cuttings were shorter and produced smaller leaves under 45B than 21B when acclimated under high CO<sub>2</sub>. In contrast, chrysanthemum cuttings were slightly taller under 45B and high CO<sub>2</sub> but were otherwise generally unresponsive to blue light. Evapotranspiration only increased in response to blue light when begonia cuttings were acclimated under high CO<sub>2</sub>. Overall, our findings show that blue-light percentage and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration may not have large effects on rooting and growth of ornamental cuttings during acclimation, but some physiological and water-use differences can be expected, particularly under different blue-light percentages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Horticulturae\",\"volume\":\"347 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Horticulturae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030442382500250X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HORTICULTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Horticulturae","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030442382500250X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在繁殖初期(“驯化”)管理环境条件以限制扦插的水分流失是至关重要的。利用菊花(chrysanthemum indicum)和海棠(begonia × hiemalis)插枝,我们的目的是表征1)在光合光子通量密度(PPFD)为70µmol·m-2·s-1时,蓝光[15%至60%]对水分利用的短期影响(实验1);2)在两种二氧化碳浓度(环境或高浓度,分别为~ 500或1200 μmol·mol-1)下,两种蓝光处理[21% (21B)或45% (45B)]对扦插苗水分利用和生长的短期和长期影响(实验2)。试验1的结果表明,蓝光的增加增加了无根扦插的水分流失和吸水性。然而,在气孔导度(gs)和蒸腾(E)方面没有测量到差异,这表明在驯化过程中气孔可能对蓝光不响应。增加蓝光可使海棠插条的gs和E呈线性增加,但对水分的利用无显著影响。实验2中测定的两种CO2浓度对蓝光的响应差异不大,表明扦插在根系发育初期对某些环境刺激的响应可能更强。各种反应是物种特异性的。例如,在高CO2驯化条件下,海棠扦插在45B条件下比21B条件下更短,叶片更小。相比之下,在45B和高CO2条件下,菊花插枝略高,但对蓝光一般不响应。当海棠插枝在高CO2环境下驯化时,其蒸散量对蓝光的响应增加。综上所述,在驯化过程中,蓝光百分比和CO2浓度对观赏插条的生根和生长影响不大,但在生理和水分利用方面存在一定差异,特别是在不同蓝光百分比下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of blue-light percentage and carbon dioxide concentration on the water status and growth of chrysanthemum and begonia cuttings in vertical indoor propagation systems
Managing environmental conditions to limit water loss of cuttings during the initial propagation phase (“acclimation”) is critical. Using chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum indicum) and begonia (Begonia × hiemalis) cuttings, our objectives were to characterize 1) short-term effects of blue light [15 % to 60 % at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 70 µmol·m2·s–1] on water use (Experiment 1); and 2) short- and long-term effects on water use and growth of cuttings acclimated under two blue-light treatments [21 % (21B) or 45 % (45B)] at two carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations (ambient or high at ∼500 or 1200 μmol·mol–1, respectively) (Experiment 2). Results from Experiment 1 generally showed that increasing blue light increased water loss and water uptake by unrooted cuttings. However, no differences were measured in stomatal conductance (gs) or transpiration (E), suggesting that stomata may be unresponsive to blue light during acclimation. In contrast, increasing blue light linearly increased gs and E of rooted begonia cuttings, but no differences were measured in water use. There were few growth differences in response to blue light at the two CO2 concentrations evaluated in Experiment 2, suggesting that cuttings may be more responsive to some environmental stimuli after initial root development. Various responses were species-specific. For example, begonia cuttings were shorter and produced smaller leaves under 45B than 21B when acclimated under high CO2. In contrast, chrysanthemum cuttings were slightly taller under 45B and high CO2 but were otherwise generally unresponsive to blue light. Evapotranspiration only increased in response to blue light when begonia cuttings were acclimated under high CO2. Overall, our findings show that blue-light percentage and CO2 concentration may not have large effects on rooting and growth of ornamental cuttings during acclimation, but some physiological and water-use differences can be expected, particularly under different blue-light percentages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Horticulturae
Scientia Horticulturae 农林科学-园艺
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.70%
发文量
796
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Scientia Horticulturae is an international journal publishing research related to horticultural crops. Articles in the journal deal with open or protected production of vegetables, fruits, edible fungi and ornamentals under temperate, subtropical and tropical conditions. Papers in related areas (biochemistry, micropropagation, soil science, plant breeding, plant physiology, phytopathology, etc.) are considered, if they contain information of direct significance to horticulture. Papers on the technical aspects of horticulture (engineering, crop processing, storage, transport etc.) are accepted for publication only if they relate directly to the living product. In the case of plantation crops, those yielding a product that may be used fresh (e.g. tropical vegetables, citrus, bananas, and other fruits) will be considered, while those papers describing the processing of the product (e.g. rubber, tobacco, and quinine) will not. The scope of the journal includes all horticultural crops but does not include speciality crops such as, medicinal crops or forestry crops, such as bamboo. Basic molecular studies without any direct application in horticulture will not be considered for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信