Michaela Nesvadbova , Radka Dziedzinska , Vladimir Babak , Petr Kralik
{"title":"用实时PCR和数字液滴PCR检测和定量肉类DNA混合物和肉类混合物中的犬DNA","authors":"Michaela Nesvadbova , Radka Dziedzinska , Vladimir Babak , Petr Kralik","doi":"10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate detection of animal species in meat products is essential for food safety, regulatory compliance, and the prevention of food fraud. This study presents the development and validation of a modified quadruplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay and singleplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for the detection and quantification of canine DNA in meat and DNA mixtures. Two- and three-species samples containing canine, pork, and chicken components (0.1 %–100 %) were prepared, including heat-treated variants. A simplified quantification approach using a single 100 % DNA reference diluted to 10 ng/µL was applied in both methods. Results from qPCR and ddPCR were statistically evaluated using ANOVA, RMSD, and coefficient of variation (CV). Both methods yielded accurate results across most concentration ranges, with no significant differences in calculated percentages. However, qPCR exhibited significantly higher variability than ddPCR, especially at extreme concentrations (<1 % and >99 %). ddPCR showed superior performance in three-species mixtures and yielded lower RMSD values overall. Despite higher variability at detection limits inherent to PCR technology, both methods are suitable for routine quantification of canine DNA in meat products. The study confirms that a single-reference standard is a cost-effective and reliable alternative to full calibration curves for species quantification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107855"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection and quantification of the canine DNA in meat DNA mixes and meat mixtures by real time PCR and digital droplet PCR\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Nesvadbova , Radka Dziedzinska , Vladimir Babak , Petr Kralik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate detection of animal species in meat products is essential for food safety, regulatory compliance, and the prevention of food fraud. This study presents the development and validation of a modified quadruplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay and singleplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for the detection and quantification of canine DNA in meat and DNA mixtures. Two- and three-species samples containing canine, pork, and chicken components (0.1 %–100 %) were prepared, including heat-treated variants. A simplified quantification approach using a single 100 % DNA reference diluted to 10 ng/µL was applied in both methods. Results from qPCR and ddPCR were statistically evaluated using ANOVA, RMSD, and coefficient of variation (CV). Both methods yielded accurate results across most concentration ranges, with no significant differences in calculated percentages. However, qPCR exhibited significantly higher variability than ddPCR, especially at extreme concentrations (<1 % and >99 %). ddPCR showed superior performance in three-species mixtures and yielded lower RMSD values overall. Despite higher variability at detection limits inherent to PCR technology, both methods are suitable for routine quantification of canine DNA in meat products. The study confirms that a single-reference standard is a cost-effective and reliable alternative to full calibration curves for species quantification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157525006702\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157525006702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Detection and quantification of the canine DNA in meat DNA mixes and meat mixtures by real time PCR and digital droplet PCR
Accurate detection of animal species in meat products is essential for food safety, regulatory compliance, and the prevention of food fraud. This study presents the development and validation of a modified quadruplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay and singleplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for the detection and quantification of canine DNA in meat and DNA mixtures. Two- and three-species samples containing canine, pork, and chicken components (0.1 %–100 %) were prepared, including heat-treated variants. A simplified quantification approach using a single 100 % DNA reference diluted to 10 ng/µL was applied in both methods. Results from qPCR and ddPCR were statistically evaluated using ANOVA, RMSD, and coefficient of variation (CV). Both methods yielded accurate results across most concentration ranges, with no significant differences in calculated percentages. However, qPCR exhibited significantly higher variability than ddPCR, especially at extreme concentrations (<1 % and >99 %). ddPCR showed superior performance in three-species mixtures and yielded lower RMSD values overall. Despite higher variability at detection limits inherent to PCR technology, both methods are suitable for routine quantification of canine DNA in meat products. The study confirms that a single-reference standard is a cost-effective and reliable alternative to full calibration curves for species quantification.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Composition and Analysis publishes manuscripts on scientific aspects of data on the chemical composition of human foods, with particular emphasis on actual data on composition of foods; analytical methods; studies on the manipulation, storage, distribution and use of food composition data; and studies on the statistics, use and distribution of such data and data systems. The Journal''s basis is nutrient composition, with increasing emphasis on bioactive non-nutrient and anti-nutrient components. Papers must provide sufficient description of the food samples, analytical methods, quality control procedures and statistical treatments of the data to permit the end users of the food composition data to evaluate the appropriateness of such data in their projects.
The Journal does not publish papers on: microbiological compounds; sensory quality; aromatics/volatiles in food and wine; essential oils; organoleptic characteristics of food; physical properties; or clinical papers and pharmacology-related papers.