用实时PCR和数字液滴PCR检测和定量肉类DNA混合物和肉类混合物中的犬DNA

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Michaela Nesvadbova , Radka Dziedzinska , Vladimir Babak , Petr Kralik
{"title":"用实时PCR和数字液滴PCR检测和定量肉类DNA混合物和肉类混合物中的犬DNA","authors":"Michaela Nesvadbova ,&nbsp;Radka Dziedzinska ,&nbsp;Vladimir Babak ,&nbsp;Petr Kralik","doi":"10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate detection of animal species in meat products is essential for food safety, regulatory compliance, and the prevention of food fraud. This study presents the development and validation of a modified quadruplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay and singleplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for the detection and quantification of canine DNA in meat and DNA mixtures. Two- and three-species samples containing canine, pork, and chicken components (0.1 %–100 %) were prepared, including heat-treated variants. A simplified quantification approach using a single 100 % DNA reference diluted to 10 ng/µL was applied in both methods. Results from qPCR and ddPCR were statistically evaluated using ANOVA, RMSD, and coefficient of variation (CV). Both methods yielded accurate results across most concentration ranges, with no significant differences in calculated percentages. However, qPCR exhibited significantly higher variability than ddPCR, especially at extreme concentrations (&lt;1 % and &gt;99 %). ddPCR showed superior performance in three-species mixtures and yielded lower RMSD values overall. Despite higher variability at detection limits inherent to PCR technology, both methods are suitable for routine quantification of canine DNA in meat products. The study confirms that a single-reference standard is a cost-effective and reliable alternative to full calibration curves for species quantification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107855"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection and quantification of the canine DNA in meat DNA mixes and meat mixtures by real time PCR and digital droplet PCR\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Nesvadbova ,&nbsp;Radka Dziedzinska ,&nbsp;Vladimir Babak ,&nbsp;Petr Kralik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate detection of animal species in meat products is essential for food safety, regulatory compliance, and the prevention of food fraud. This study presents the development and validation of a modified quadruplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay and singleplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for the detection and quantification of canine DNA in meat and DNA mixtures. Two- and three-species samples containing canine, pork, and chicken components (0.1 %–100 %) were prepared, including heat-treated variants. A simplified quantification approach using a single 100 % DNA reference diluted to 10 ng/µL was applied in both methods. Results from qPCR and ddPCR were statistically evaluated using ANOVA, RMSD, and coefficient of variation (CV). Both methods yielded accurate results across most concentration ranges, with no significant differences in calculated percentages. However, qPCR exhibited significantly higher variability than ddPCR, especially at extreme concentrations (&lt;1 % and &gt;99 %). ddPCR showed superior performance in three-species mixtures and yielded lower RMSD values overall. Despite higher variability at detection limits inherent to PCR technology, both methods are suitable for routine quantification of canine DNA in meat products. The study confirms that a single-reference standard is a cost-effective and reliable alternative to full calibration curves for species quantification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157525006702\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157525006702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确检测肉类产品中的动物种类对食品安全、法规遵守和防止食品欺诈至关重要。本研究提出了一种改进的四重定量PCR (qPCR)和单滴数字PCR (ddPCR)方法,用于检测和定量肉类和DNA混合物中的犬DNA。制备了含有犬、猪肉和鸡肉成分(0.1 % - 100 %)的两种和三种样品,包括热处理的变体。两种方法均采用简化的定量方法,将单个100 % DNA参比稀释至10 ng/µL。采用方差分析(ANOVA)、RMSD和变异系数(CV)对qPCR和ddPCR结果进行统计学评价。两种方法在大多数浓度范围内都产生了准确的结果,计算百分比没有显着差异。然而,qPCR表现出明显高于ddPCR的变异性,特别是在极端浓度下(<;1 %和>;99 %)。ddPCR在三种混合物中表现出较好的性能,总体上RMSD值较低。尽管PCR技术固有的检测限具有较高的可变性,但两种方法都适用于肉制品中犬DNA的常规定量。该研究证实,单一参考标准是一种成本效益高、可靠的替代方法,可用于物种定量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection and quantification of the canine DNA in meat DNA mixes and meat mixtures by real time PCR and digital droplet PCR
Accurate detection of animal species in meat products is essential for food safety, regulatory compliance, and the prevention of food fraud. This study presents the development and validation of a modified quadruplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay and singleplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for the detection and quantification of canine DNA in meat and DNA mixtures. Two- and three-species samples containing canine, pork, and chicken components (0.1 %–100 %) were prepared, including heat-treated variants. A simplified quantification approach using a single 100 % DNA reference diluted to 10 ng/µL was applied in both methods. Results from qPCR and ddPCR were statistically evaluated using ANOVA, RMSD, and coefficient of variation (CV). Both methods yielded accurate results across most concentration ranges, with no significant differences in calculated percentages. However, qPCR exhibited significantly higher variability than ddPCR, especially at extreme concentrations (<1 % and >99 %). ddPCR showed superior performance in three-species mixtures and yielded lower RMSD values overall. Despite higher variability at detection limits inherent to PCR technology, both methods are suitable for routine quantification of canine DNA in meat products. The study confirms that a single-reference standard is a cost-effective and reliable alternative to full calibration curves for species quantification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Composition and Analysis publishes manuscripts on scientific aspects of data on the chemical composition of human foods, with particular emphasis on actual data on composition of foods; analytical methods; studies on the manipulation, storage, distribution and use of food composition data; and studies on the statistics, use and distribution of such data and data systems. The Journal''s basis is nutrient composition, with increasing emphasis on bioactive non-nutrient and anti-nutrient components. Papers must provide sufficient description of the food samples, analytical methods, quality control procedures and statistical treatments of the data to permit the end users of the food composition data to evaluate the appropriateness of such data in their projects. The Journal does not publish papers on: microbiological compounds; sensory quality; aromatics/volatiles in food and wine; essential oils; organoleptic characteristics of food; physical properties; or clinical papers and pharmacology-related papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信