本科护生对模拟学习述职会议的看法：一项系统回顾

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING

Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2025.03.018

Leanne Glennie RN

{"title":"本科护生对模拟学习述职会议的看法：一项系统回顾","authors":"Leanne Glennie RN","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review is to determine how debriefing processes, perceived by undergraduate nursing students, affect confidence and learning outcomes from qualitative studies conducted between 2019 and 2023.</div></div><div><h3>REVIEW METHODS</h3><div>This systematic review is aligned with the PRSIMA 2020 search strategy and includes data from only qualitative studies. Previous studies on perceived outcomes surrounding effective debriefing processes within simulation-based learning has predominantly focused on quantitative and mixed method studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 358 primary studies were obtained from the initial search: CINAHL (n = 64), ERIC (n = 3), MEDLINE (ProQuest) (n = 42), SCOPUS (n = 101), and WEB OF SCIENCE (n = 137); and hand searched articles (n = 11). A total of 5 studies were included in the review from which 3 underlying commonalities were identified: Self-awareness and self-confidence; Safe Learning Environment; and Confidence for Clinical Practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The debriefing process is perceived as having a positive effect on students’; however, a 2-step approach to debriefing in which self-reflection prior to group discussion on their performance is preferred.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages e907-e914"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of debriefing sessions in simulation-based learning: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Leanne Glennie RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2025.03.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review is to determine how debriefing processes, perceived by undergraduate nursing students, affect confidence and learning outcomes from qualitative studies conducted between 2019 and 2023.</div></div><div><h3>REVIEW METHODS</h3><div>This systematic review is aligned with the PRSIMA 2020 search strategy and includes data from only qualitative studies. Previous studies on perceived outcomes surrounding effective debriefing processes within simulation-based learning has predominantly focused on quantitative and mixed method studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 358 primary studies were obtained from the initial search: CINAHL (n = 64), ERIC (n = 3), MEDLINE (ProQuest) (n = 42), SCOPUS (n = 101), and WEB OF SCIENCE (n = 137); and hand searched articles (n = 11). A total of 5 studies were included in the review from which 3 underlying commonalities were identified: Self-awareness and self-confidence; Safe Learning Environment; and Confidence for Clinical Practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The debriefing process is perceived as having a positive effect on students’; however, a 2-step approach to debriefing in which self-reflection prior to group discussion on their performance is preferred.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages e907-e914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725001143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725001143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述的目的是确定本科护理学生所感知的述职过程如何影响2019年至2023年进行的定性研究的信心和学习成果。本系统综述与PRSIMA 2020检索策略一致，仅包括定性研究的数据。先前关于模拟学习中有效汇报过程的感知结果的研究主要集中在定量和混合方法研究上。ResultsA共有358名主要研究了从最初的搜索:CINAHL (n = 64),埃里克•(n = 3)MEDLINE (ProQuest) (n = 42),斯高帕斯(n = 101),科学和网络(n = 137);手工搜索文章（n = 11）。本综述共纳入了5项研究，从中确定了3个潜在的共性：自我意识和自信；安全学习环境；和临床实践的信心。结论述职过程对学生的心理素质有积极的影响；然而，最好采用两步汇报方法，在小组讨论他们的表现之前进行自我反思。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of debriefing sessions in simulation-based learning: A systematic review

Objectives

The aim of this systematic review is to determine how debriefing processes, perceived by undergraduate nursing students, affect confidence and learning outcomes from qualitative studies conducted between 2019 and 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

This systematic review is aligned with the PRSIMA 2020 search strategy and includes data from only qualitative studies. Previous studies on perceived outcomes surrounding effective debriefing processes within simulation-based learning has predominantly focused on quantitative and mixed method studies.

Results

A total of 358 primary studies were obtained from the initial search: CINAHL (n = 64), ERIC (n = 3), MEDLINE (ProQuest) (n = 42), SCOPUS (n = 101), and WEB OF SCIENCE (n = 137); and hand searched articles (n = 11). A total of 5 studies were included in the review from which 3 underlying commonalities were identified: Self-awareness and self-confidence; Safe Learning Environment; and Confidence for Clinical Practice.

Conclusion

The debriefing process is perceived as having a positive effect on students’; however, a 2-step approach to debriefing in which self-reflection prior to group discussion on their performance is preferred.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Teaching and Learning in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

10.50%

发文量

119

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty