护理教科书真的是基于循证实践吗?

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING
Kathleen Rhodes PhD, RN, FNP-C, CNE, Deloris Slade DNP, RN, FNP-C
{"title":"护理教科书真的是基于循证实践吗?","authors":"Kathleen Rhodes PhD, RN, FNP-C, CNE,&nbsp;Deloris Slade DNP, RN, FNP-C","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The foundation of nursing is evidence-based practice and its implementation. This knowledge is gained in nursing education from faculty who must rely heavily on published textbooks. Nurse educators depend on textbooks to present the latest evidence-based theory available to support nursing practice when compounded by faculty shortages.</div></div><div><h3>Major points</h3><div>Based on evaluations of several current editions of nursing textbooks, multiple errors in evidence-based practice were found. This disconnect between accurate evidence and nursing education showcases a significant potential for increasing unintentional patient harm.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Healthcare consumers rely more on nurses than other professionals to explain and deliver high-quality health interventions. The potential for harm based on an inaccurate knowledge base meant to support evidence-based nursing practice is not an acceptable risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This paper issues a clarion call for those in the nursing publishing industry to commit to editing closely for changes in the underlying theory and guidelines that support evidence-based practice and serves as a cautionary word to faculty to exercise diligence in evaluating the content of textbooks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages 291-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are nursing textbooks really based on evidence-based practice?\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Rhodes PhD, RN, FNP-C, CNE,&nbsp;Deloris Slade DNP, RN, FNP-C\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2025.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The foundation of nursing is evidence-based practice and its implementation. This knowledge is gained in nursing education from faculty who must rely heavily on published textbooks. Nurse educators depend on textbooks to present the latest evidence-based theory available to support nursing practice when compounded by faculty shortages.</div></div><div><h3>Major points</h3><div>Based on evaluations of several current editions of nursing textbooks, multiple errors in evidence-based practice were found. This disconnect between accurate evidence and nursing education showcases a significant potential for increasing unintentional patient harm.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Healthcare consumers rely more on nurses than other professionals to explain and deliver high-quality health interventions. The potential for harm based on an inaccurate knowledge base meant to support evidence-based nursing practice is not an acceptable risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This paper issues a clarion call for those in the nursing publishing industry to commit to editing closely for changes in the underlying theory and guidelines that support evidence-based practice and serves as a cautionary word to faculty to exercise diligence in evaluating the content of textbooks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 291-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725000885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725000885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护理学的基础是循证实践及其实施。这些知识是在护理教育中从教师那里获得的,他们必须严重依赖出版的教科书。护士教育工作者依靠教科书来呈现最新的循证理论,以支持教师短缺的护理实践。通过对现行几版护理教材的评价,发现在循证实践中存在较多错误。这种准确的证据和护理教育之间的脱节显示了增加患者意外伤害的巨大潜力。在解释和提供高质量的健康干预措施方面,医疗保健消费者比其他专业人士更依赖护士。基于不准确的知识基础的潜在危害,旨在支持循证护理实践,是不可接受的风险。结论:本文为护理出版行业的从业者们发出了一个号角,呼吁他们密切关注基础理论和指导方针的变化,以支持循证实践,并为教师们在评估教科书内容时谨慎行事提供警示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are nursing textbooks really based on evidence-based practice?

Background

The foundation of nursing is evidence-based practice and its implementation. This knowledge is gained in nursing education from faculty who must rely heavily on published textbooks. Nurse educators depend on textbooks to present the latest evidence-based theory available to support nursing practice when compounded by faculty shortages.

Major points

Based on evaluations of several current editions of nursing textbooks, multiple errors in evidence-based practice were found. This disconnect between accurate evidence and nursing education showcases a significant potential for increasing unintentional patient harm.

Implications

Healthcare consumers rely more on nurses than other professionals to explain and deliver high-quality health interventions. The potential for harm based on an inaccurate knowledge base meant to support evidence-based nursing practice is not an acceptable risk.

Conclusions

This paper issues a clarion call for those in the nursing publishing industry to commit to editing closely for changes in the underlying theory and guidelines that support evidence-based practice and serves as a cautionary word to faculty to exercise diligence in evaluating the content of textbooks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信