加拿大职业治疗项目实际教授了多少普遍可及性?:加拿大职业治疗项目在多大程度上教授普遍可及性?

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Alicia Ruiz-Rodrigo, David Gotti, Ernesto Morales, François Routhier
{"title":"加拿大职业治疗项目实际教授了多少普遍可及性?:加拿大职业治疗项目在多大程度上教授普遍可及性?","authors":"Alicia Ruiz-Rodrigo, David Gotti, Ernesto Morales, François Routhier","doi":"10.1177/00084174251340647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The environment is essential to occupational participation. However, the involvement and training of occupational therapists in universal accessibility (UA) seems limited. <b>Purpose.</b> To explore the content on UA taught in university occupational therapy programs in Canada. <b>Method.</b> This study adopts a mixed methodology. A survey, including mostly quantitative data, was distributed to occupational therapy programs across Canada, and course syllabi related to UA, providing qualitative data, were requested. Analysis included descriptive statistics and content descriptive analysis. <b>Findings.</b> Thirteen out of 14 programs responded to the survey and five provided course syllabi. While all programs cover UA content, only seven offer specific courses on accessibility. Internships related to UA are offered by seven programs. Some gaps identified include limited knowledge, lack of in-depth content, and limited interprofessional collaboration. There are variations in emphasis on UA and teaching approaches. Boundaries between universal approaches and knowledge of specific disability groups are poorly delineated. UA is unanimously considered essential in the training of occupational therapists. <b>Conclusion.</b> The content in UA is heterogeneous across programs. Consensual definitions of accessibility concepts related to occupational therapy are needed to better define the role of the occupational therapist in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":49097,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","volume":" ","pages":"84174251340647"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How much is Universal Accessibility Actually Taught in Canadian Occupational Therapy Programs?: Dans quelle mesure l'accessibilité universelle est-elle enseignée dans les programmes canadiens d'ergothérapie?\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Ruiz-Rodrigo, David Gotti, Ernesto Morales, François Routhier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00084174251340647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The environment is essential to occupational participation. However, the involvement and training of occupational therapists in universal accessibility (UA) seems limited. <b>Purpose.</b> To explore the content on UA taught in university occupational therapy programs in Canada. <b>Method.</b> This study adopts a mixed methodology. A survey, including mostly quantitative data, was distributed to occupational therapy programs across Canada, and course syllabi related to UA, providing qualitative data, were requested. Analysis included descriptive statistics and content descriptive analysis. <b>Findings.</b> Thirteen out of 14 programs responded to the survey and five provided course syllabi. While all programs cover UA content, only seven offer specific courses on accessibility. Internships related to UA are offered by seven programs. Some gaps identified include limited knowledge, lack of in-depth content, and limited interprofessional collaboration. There are variations in emphasis on UA and teaching approaches. Boundaries between universal approaches and knowledge of specific disability groups are poorly delineated. UA is unanimously considered essential in the training of occupational therapists. <b>Conclusion.</b> The content in UA is heterogeneous across programs. Consensual definitions of accessibility concepts related to occupational therapy are needed to better define the role of the occupational therapist in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"84174251340647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174251340647\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174251340647","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:环境对职业参与至关重要。然而,职业治疗师在普遍可及性(UA)方面的参与和培训似乎有限。目的。探讨加拿大大学职业治疗专业UA教学内容。方法。本研究采用混合方法。一项调查,主要包括定量数据,分发给加拿大各地的职业治疗项目,并要求提供与UA相关的课程大纲,提供定性数据。分析包括描述性统计和内容描述性分析。发现。14个项目中有13个回应了调查,5个提供了课程大纲。虽然所有项目都涵盖了UA内容,但只有7个项目提供了关于无障碍的具体课程。与UA相关的实习由七个项目提供。发现的一些差距包括有限的知识,缺乏深入的内容,以及有限的跨专业合作。对UA的重视程度和教学方法各不相同。普遍方法和对特定残疾群体的了解之间的界限界定不清。UA在职业治疗师的培训中被一致认为是必不可少的。结论。UA中的内容跨程序是异构的。需要对与职业治疗相关的可及性概念进行共识定义,以便更好地定义职业治疗师在这一领域的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How much is Universal Accessibility Actually Taught in Canadian Occupational Therapy Programs?: Dans quelle mesure l'accessibilité universelle est-elle enseignée dans les programmes canadiens d'ergothérapie?

Background: The environment is essential to occupational participation. However, the involvement and training of occupational therapists in universal accessibility (UA) seems limited. Purpose. To explore the content on UA taught in university occupational therapy programs in Canada. Method. This study adopts a mixed methodology. A survey, including mostly quantitative data, was distributed to occupational therapy programs across Canada, and course syllabi related to UA, providing qualitative data, were requested. Analysis included descriptive statistics and content descriptive analysis. Findings. Thirteen out of 14 programs responded to the survey and five provided course syllabi. While all programs cover UA content, only seven offer specific courses on accessibility. Internships related to UA are offered by seven programs. Some gaps identified include limited knowledge, lack of in-depth content, and limited interprofessional collaboration. There are variations in emphasis on UA and teaching approaches. Boundaries between universal approaches and knowledge of specific disability groups are poorly delineated. UA is unanimously considered essential in the training of occupational therapists. Conclusion. The content in UA is heterogeneous across programs. Consensual definitions of accessibility concepts related to occupational therapy are needed to better define the role of the occupational therapist in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy was first published in September 1933. Since that time, it has fostered advancement and growth in occupational therapy scholarship. The mission of the journal is to provide a forum for leading-edge occupational therapy scholarship that advances theory, practice, research, and policy. The vision is to be a high-quality scholarly journal that is at the forefront of the science of occupational therapy and a destination journal for the top scholars in the field, globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信