Charlene Wright, Jaimon T Kelly, Danielle Dawson, Katrina L Campbell, Tara Diversi, Kyra Hamilton
{"title":"为接受减肥手术的患者设计和营销移动健康解决方案:利益相关者需求的定性分析。","authors":"Charlene Wright, Jaimon T Kelly, Danielle Dawson, Katrina L Campbell, Tara Diversi, Kyra Hamilton","doi":"10.1080/07359683.2025.2504824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Consumer-focused behavioral frameworks can guide mobile health (mHealth) solution development, yet their application in specialized healthcare contexts remains understudied. This research gathered key stakeholder insights to inform both development and marketing strategies for mHealth solutions supporting patients undergoing bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (<i>n</i> = 16) and dietitians (<i>n</i> = 24) using an interview guide aligned with behavioral frameworks (the Fogg Behavior Model and Hook Model). Participants were recruited through professional networks and social media platforms. Interviews were analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches to identify market segments and health marketing implications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed three distinct market segments requiring tailored marketing strategies: recovery phase (early recovery, adaptation, maintenance), healthcare setting (private versus public), and stakeholder type (patients versus providers). Recovery phase segmentation revealed evolving consumer needs: early-recovery patients prioritized education, adaptation-phase patients focused on routines, and maintenance-phase patients sought sustainable behavior change features. Private healthcare stakeholders demonstrated higher willingness to pay for comprehensive features, while public healthcare required institutional approaches. Patients prioritized integrated functionality and user experience, whereas dietitians emphasized clinical safety and evidence-based content.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings translate into practical marketing implications including phase-specific targeting, dual stakeholder engagement strategies, and equity-centered approaches that address healthcare disparities. This study highlights limitations in existing behavioral frameworks when applied to healthcare contexts and identifies key areas where adaptations are needed, particularly around healthcare provider endorsement and balancing engagement with clinical appropriateness. The findings point toward the need for specialized mHealth marketing approaches that can navigate between commercial objectives and healthcare requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":36008,"journal":{"name":"Health Marketing Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and Marketing mHealth Solutions for Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Requirements.\",\"authors\":\"Charlene Wright, Jaimon T Kelly, Danielle Dawson, Katrina L Campbell, Tara Diversi, Kyra Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07359683.2025.2504824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Consumer-focused behavioral frameworks can guide mobile health (mHealth) solution development, yet their application in specialized healthcare contexts remains understudied. This research gathered key stakeholder insights to inform both development and marketing strategies for mHealth solutions supporting patients undergoing bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (<i>n</i> = 16) and dietitians (<i>n</i> = 24) using an interview guide aligned with behavioral frameworks (the Fogg Behavior Model and Hook Model). Participants were recruited through professional networks and social media platforms. Interviews were analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches to identify market segments and health marketing implications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed three distinct market segments requiring tailored marketing strategies: recovery phase (early recovery, adaptation, maintenance), healthcare setting (private versus public), and stakeholder type (patients versus providers). Recovery phase segmentation revealed evolving consumer needs: early-recovery patients prioritized education, adaptation-phase patients focused on routines, and maintenance-phase patients sought sustainable behavior change features. Private healthcare stakeholders demonstrated higher willingness to pay for comprehensive features, while public healthcare required institutional approaches. Patients prioritized integrated functionality and user experience, whereas dietitians emphasized clinical safety and evidence-based content.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings translate into practical marketing implications including phase-specific targeting, dual stakeholder engagement strategies, and equity-centered approaches that address healthcare disparities. This study highlights limitations in existing behavioral frameworks when applied to healthcare contexts and identifies key areas where adaptations are needed, particularly around healthcare provider endorsement and balancing engagement with clinical appropriateness. The findings point toward the need for specialized mHealth marketing approaches that can navigate between commercial objectives and healthcare requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Marketing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Marketing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2025.2504824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Marketing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2025.2504824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Design and Marketing mHealth Solutions for Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Requirements.
Aim: Consumer-focused behavioral frameworks can guide mobile health (mHealth) solution development, yet their application in specialized healthcare contexts remains understudied. This research gathered key stakeholder insights to inform both development and marketing strategies for mHealth solutions supporting patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (n = 16) and dietitians (n = 24) using an interview guide aligned with behavioral frameworks (the Fogg Behavior Model and Hook Model). Participants were recruited through professional networks and social media platforms. Interviews were analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches to identify market segments and health marketing implications.
Results: Analysis revealed three distinct market segments requiring tailored marketing strategies: recovery phase (early recovery, adaptation, maintenance), healthcare setting (private versus public), and stakeholder type (patients versus providers). Recovery phase segmentation revealed evolving consumer needs: early-recovery patients prioritized education, adaptation-phase patients focused on routines, and maintenance-phase patients sought sustainable behavior change features. Private healthcare stakeholders demonstrated higher willingness to pay for comprehensive features, while public healthcare required institutional approaches. Patients prioritized integrated functionality and user experience, whereas dietitians emphasized clinical safety and evidence-based content.
Conclusion: Findings translate into practical marketing implications including phase-specific targeting, dual stakeholder engagement strategies, and equity-centered approaches that address healthcare disparities. This study highlights limitations in existing behavioral frameworks when applied to healthcare contexts and identifies key areas where adaptations are needed, particularly around healthcare provider endorsement and balancing engagement with clinical appropriateness. The findings point toward the need for specialized mHealth marketing approaches that can navigate between commercial objectives and healthcare requirements.
期刊介绍:
Health Marketing Quarterly is directed at academicians and practitioners who are concerned with the concepts, practice, and research of health care marketing in today"s complex environment. The journal addresses important contemporary issues in the use of marketing by health care organizations like hospitals, individual practitioners, and public health care organizations. This includes the use of marketing to promote, position, deter, enhance health care organizations/issues, and the development of the marketing literature on both a conceptual and empirical basis.