可变生产率Hawkes过程的有效非参数估计。

IF 1.1 4区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Journal of Applied Statistics Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/02664763.2024.2426019
Sophie Phillips, Frederic Schoenberg
{"title":"可变生产率Hawkes过程的有效非参数估计。","authors":"Sophie Phillips, Frederic Schoenberg","doi":"10.1080/02664763.2024.2426019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several approaches to estimating the productivity function for a Hawkes point process with variable productivity are discussed, improved upon, and compared in terms of their root-mean-squared error and computational efficiency for various data sizes, and for binned as well as unbinned data. We find that for unbinned data, a regularized version of the analytic maximum likelihood estimator proposed by Schoenberg is the most accurate but is computationally burdensome. The unregularized version of the estimator is faster to compute but has lower accuracy, though both estimators outperform empirical or binned least squares estimators in terms of root-mean-squared error, especially when the mean productivity is 0.2 or greater. For binned data, binned least squares estimates are highly efficient both in terms of computation time and root-mean-squared error. An extension to estimating transmission time density is discussed, and an application to estimating the productivity of Covid-19 in the United States as a function of time from January 2020 to July 2022 is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":15239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Statistics","volume":"52 7","pages":"1405-1422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient non-parametric estimation of variable productivity Hawkes processes.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Phillips, Frederic Schoenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02664763.2024.2426019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Several approaches to estimating the productivity function for a Hawkes point process with variable productivity are discussed, improved upon, and compared in terms of their root-mean-squared error and computational efficiency for various data sizes, and for binned as well as unbinned data. We find that for unbinned data, a regularized version of the analytic maximum likelihood estimator proposed by Schoenberg is the most accurate but is computationally burdensome. The unregularized version of the estimator is faster to compute but has lower accuracy, though both estimators outperform empirical or binned least squares estimators in terms of root-mean-squared error, especially when the mean productivity is 0.2 or greater. For binned data, binned least squares estimates are highly efficient both in terms of computation time and root-mean-squared error. An extension to estimating transmission time density is discussed, and an application to estimating the productivity of Covid-19 in the United States as a function of time from January 2020 to July 2022 is provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Statistics\",\"volume\":\"52 7\",\"pages\":\"1405-1422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2024.2426019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2024.2426019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了几种估算具有可变生产率的Hawkes点过程的生产率函数的方法,对其进行了改进,并根据其根均方误差和计算效率对各种数据大小进行了比较,并对分类和非分类数据进行了比较。我们发现,对于非装箱数据,Schoenberg提出的正则化版本的解析极大似然估计是最准确的,但计算量很大。非正则版本的估计器计算速度更快,但精度较低,尽管两种估计器在均方根误差方面都优于经验估计器或分箱最小二乘估计器,特别是当平均生产率为0.2或更高时。对于分类数据,分类最小二乘估计在计算时间和均方根误差方面都是非常有效的。讨论了估计传播时间密度的扩展,并提供了一个应用程序,用于估计2020年1月至2022年7月期间美国Covid-19的生产力作为时间函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficient non-parametric estimation of variable productivity Hawkes processes.

Efficient non-parametric estimation of variable productivity Hawkes processes.

Efficient non-parametric estimation of variable productivity Hawkes processes.

Efficient non-parametric estimation of variable productivity Hawkes processes.

Several approaches to estimating the productivity function for a Hawkes point process with variable productivity are discussed, improved upon, and compared in terms of their root-mean-squared error and computational efficiency for various data sizes, and for binned as well as unbinned data. We find that for unbinned data, a regularized version of the analytic maximum likelihood estimator proposed by Schoenberg is the most accurate but is computationally burdensome. The unregularized version of the estimator is faster to compute but has lower accuracy, though both estimators outperform empirical or binned least squares estimators in terms of root-mean-squared error, especially when the mean productivity is 0.2 or greater. For binned data, binned least squares estimates are highly efficient both in terms of computation time and root-mean-squared error. An extension to estimating transmission time density is discussed, and an application to estimating the productivity of Covid-19 in the United States as a function of time from January 2020 to July 2022 is provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Statistics
Journal of Applied Statistics 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Statistics provides a forum for communication between both applied statisticians and users of applied statistical techniques across a wide range of disciplines. These areas include business, computing, economics, ecology, education, management, medicine, operational research and sociology, but papers from other areas are also considered. The editorial policy is to publish rigorous but clear and accessible papers on applied techniques. Purely theoretical papers are avoided but those on theoretical developments which clearly demonstrate significant applied potential are welcomed. Each paper is submitted to at least two independent referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信