通过药物优化在医学教育中教授常规的以人为本的实践:一个现实的回顾。

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Richard Bodington, Joanne Reeve, David Hepburn, Matthew Morgan, Paul E S Crampton
{"title":"通过药物优化在医学教育中教授常规的以人为本的实践:一个现实的回顾。","authors":"Richard Bodington, Joanne Reeve, David Hepburn, Matthew Morgan, Paul E S Crampton","doi":"10.1111/medu.15727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbid patients are not well served by a narrow biomedical disease-focused approach to health care. The situation calls for a paradigm shift in health care practice towards an interpretive, person-centred model. Medical educators urgently need to teach medical students how to integrate biomedical and interpretive approaches to illness but practical pedagogy in the field is lacking. Medicines optimisation (MO), which encompasses deprescribing, provides an everyday case study of a curriculum theme requiring the everyday integration of potentially dissonant illness perspectives to achieve learning applicable for clinical practice. By clarifying 'what works, for whom, under what circumstances, how and why' in MO education, we can better support the practical integration of dissonant illness perspectives in wider medical education.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A realist review was conducted in keeping with the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines identifying MO educational interventions trialled in undergraduate medical curricula globally and developing a programme theory (PT) illuminating the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes related to these interventions. Databases including Medline, Embase, Scopus and ERIC were searched. Inclusion criteria focused on undergraduate MO/deprescribing educational interventions and were iteratively adjusted for PT development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 56 documents highlighted four key components needed to integrate biomedical and interpretive illness perspectives: the role of stakeholder perceptions influencing prioritisation, resource allocation and engagement; meaningful inclusion into summative assessments; learners' appreciation of their professional role and responsibility; and alignment of programmes with workplace and institutional culture.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our PT uniquely unpacks the black-box of undergraduate MO educational programmes and will be developed through subsequent evaluations. The PT provides insight for educators in clinical pharmacology and more widely as an exemplar of education requiring the practical integration of biomedical and interpretive illness perspectives required of modern practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching routine person-centred practice in medical education through medicines optimisation: A realist review.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Bodington, Joanne Reeve, David Hepburn, Matthew Morgan, Paul E S Crampton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbid patients are not well served by a narrow biomedical disease-focused approach to health care. The situation calls for a paradigm shift in health care practice towards an interpretive, person-centred model. Medical educators urgently need to teach medical students how to integrate biomedical and interpretive approaches to illness but practical pedagogy in the field is lacking. Medicines optimisation (MO), which encompasses deprescribing, provides an everyday case study of a curriculum theme requiring the everyday integration of potentially dissonant illness perspectives to achieve learning applicable for clinical practice. By clarifying 'what works, for whom, under what circumstances, how and why' in MO education, we can better support the practical integration of dissonant illness perspectives in wider medical education.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A realist review was conducted in keeping with the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines identifying MO educational interventions trialled in undergraduate medical curricula globally and developing a programme theory (PT) illuminating the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes related to these interventions. Databases including Medline, Embase, Scopus and ERIC were searched. Inclusion criteria focused on undergraduate MO/deprescribing educational interventions and were iteratively adjusted for PT development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 56 documents highlighted four key components needed to integrate biomedical and interpretive illness perspectives: the role of stakeholder perceptions influencing prioritisation, resource allocation and engagement; meaningful inclusion into summative assessments; learners' appreciation of their professional role and responsibility; and alignment of programmes with workplace and institutional culture.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our PT uniquely unpacks the black-box of undergraduate MO educational programmes and will be developed through subsequent evaluations. The PT provides insight for educators in clinical pharmacology and more widely as an exemplar of education requiring the practical integration of biomedical and interpretive illness perspectives required of modern practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15727\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多病患者不能很好地服务于狭窄的生物医学疾病为重点的方法来卫生保健。这种情况要求将卫生保健实践的模式转变为一种解释性的、以人为本的模式。医学教育工作者迫切需要教医学生如何将生物医学和解释方法结合起来,但这方面的实践教学法缺乏。药物优化(MO),其中包括处方,提供了一个课程主题的日常案例研究,需要日常整合潜在的不和谐的疾病观点,以实现适用于临床实践的学习。通过澄清MO教育中的“什么有效,对谁有效,在什么情况下有效,如何有效,为什么有效”,我们可以更好地支持在更广泛的医学教育中实际整合不和谐疾病的观点。方法:根据现实主义和元叙事证据综合:不断发展的标准(RAMESES)指南进行了现实主义回顾,确定了在全球本科医学课程中试验的MO教育干预措施,并发展了一个项目理论(PT),阐明了与这些干预措施相关的背景、机制和结果。检索数据库包括Medline、Embase、Scopus和ERIC。纳入标准侧重于本科MO/描述性教育干预,并针对PT发展进行迭代调整。结果:对56份文件的分析突出了整合生物医学和解释性疾病观点所需的四个关键组成部分:利益相关者的看法对优先次序、资源分配和参与的影响;有意义地纳入总结性评估;学习者对其专业角色和责任的认识;使项目与工作场所和机构文化保持一致。讨论:我们的PT独特地解开了本科MO教育计划的黑盒子,并将通过后续评估进行开发。PT为临床药理学教育工作者提供了洞察力,更广泛地作为现代从业者需要的生物医学和解释疾病观点的实际整合教育的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching routine person-centred practice in medical education through medicines optimisation: A realist review.

Background: Multimorbid patients are not well served by a narrow biomedical disease-focused approach to health care. The situation calls for a paradigm shift in health care practice towards an interpretive, person-centred model. Medical educators urgently need to teach medical students how to integrate biomedical and interpretive approaches to illness but practical pedagogy in the field is lacking. Medicines optimisation (MO), which encompasses deprescribing, provides an everyday case study of a curriculum theme requiring the everyday integration of potentially dissonant illness perspectives to achieve learning applicable for clinical practice. By clarifying 'what works, for whom, under what circumstances, how and why' in MO education, we can better support the practical integration of dissonant illness perspectives in wider medical education.

Method: A realist review was conducted in keeping with the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines identifying MO educational interventions trialled in undergraduate medical curricula globally and developing a programme theory (PT) illuminating the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes related to these interventions. Databases including Medline, Embase, Scopus and ERIC were searched. Inclusion criteria focused on undergraduate MO/deprescribing educational interventions and were iteratively adjusted for PT development.

Results: Analysis of 56 documents highlighted four key components needed to integrate biomedical and interpretive illness perspectives: the role of stakeholder perceptions influencing prioritisation, resource allocation and engagement; meaningful inclusion into summative assessments; learners' appreciation of their professional role and responsibility; and alignment of programmes with workplace and institutional culture.

Discussion: Our PT uniquely unpacks the black-box of undergraduate MO educational programmes and will be developed through subsequent evaluations. The PT provides insight for educators in clinical pharmacology and more widely as an exemplar of education requiring the practical integration of biomedical and interpretive illness perspectives required of modern practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信