Anna Latorre, Kais Humaidan, Mauro Sanna, Maria Lucrezia Lavena, Sara Pittalis, Clio Raimondi, Elias Paolo Casula, Lorenzo Rocchi
{"title":"人类上肢远端小脑控制的表面脑电图证据。","authors":"Anna Latorre, Kais Humaidan, Mauro Sanna, Maria Lucrezia Lavena, Sara Pittalis, Clio Raimondi, Elias Paolo Casula, Lorenzo Rocchi","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15050440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The cerebellum plays a crucial role in motor control, but its direct electrophysiological investigation in humans is challenging. Electrocerebellograms (ECeGs), recorded via surface electrodes below the inion, have been proposed as a non-invasive method to assess cerebellar activity. However, its interpretation is complicated by potential interference from occipital alpha rhythms and neck muscle signals. This study aimed to investigate whether ECeG signals genuinely reflect cerebellar involvement during upper limb movement and to explore possible confounding influences. <b>Methods</b>: We recorded electroencephalograms (EEGs) from occipital (Oz) and cerebellar electrodes (Cb1 and Cb2), alongside EMGs from forearm muscles in healthy individuals performing sinusoidal (~1 Hz) and tremor-like (~4 Hz) wrist movements. To assess occipital contamination, recordings were obtained under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. <b>Results</b>: Occipital alpha power was present in Cb1 and Cb2 but was less affected by eye-opening than at Oz, suggesting a partially distinct neural source. During the tremor condition, movement-frequency power increased at Cb2 and C3 (corresponding to the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere and contralateral motor cortex), indicating authentic cerebellar activity. No significant movement-related EEG changes were observed during sinusoidal movements, likely due to weaker neuronal synchronization. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that ECeGs can detect cerebellar signals linked to movement, especially during faster and rhythmic motions, and are only moderately affected by occipital contamination. This supports the feasibility of non-invasive cerebellar electrophysiology and underscores the need for further methodological refinement to enhance signal specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface EEG Evidence for Cerebellar Control of Distal Upper Limbs in Humans.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Latorre, Kais Humaidan, Mauro Sanna, Maria Lucrezia Lavena, Sara Pittalis, Clio Raimondi, Elias Paolo Casula, Lorenzo Rocchi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/brainsci15050440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The cerebellum plays a crucial role in motor control, but its direct electrophysiological investigation in humans is challenging. Electrocerebellograms (ECeGs), recorded via surface electrodes below the inion, have been proposed as a non-invasive method to assess cerebellar activity. However, its interpretation is complicated by potential interference from occipital alpha rhythms and neck muscle signals. This study aimed to investigate whether ECeG signals genuinely reflect cerebellar involvement during upper limb movement and to explore possible confounding influences. <b>Methods</b>: We recorded electroencephalograms (EEGs) from occipital (Oz) and cerebellar electrodes (Cb1 and Cb2), alongside EMGs from forearm muscles in healthy individuals performing sinusoidal (~1 Hz) and tremor-like (~4 Hz) wrist movements. To assess occipital contamination, recordings were obtained under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. <b>Results</b>: Occipital alpha power was present in Cb1 and Cb2 but was less affected by eye-opening than at Oz, suggesting a partially distinct neural source. During the tremor condition, movement-frequency power increased at Cb2 and C3 (corresponding to the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere and contralateral motor cortex), indicating authentic cerebellar activity. No significant movement-related EEG changes were observed during sinusoidal movements, likely due to weaker neuronal synchronization. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that ECeGs can detect cerebellar signals linked to movement, especially during faster and rhythmic motions, and are only moderately affected by occipital contamination. This supports the feasibility of non-invasive cerebellar electrophysiology and underscores the need for further methodological refinement to enhance signal specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050440\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surface EEG Evidence for Cerebellar Control of Distal Upper Limbs in Humans.
Background/Objectives: The cerebellum plays a crucial role in motor control, but its direct electrophysiological investigation in humans is challenging. Electrocerebellograms (ECeGs), recorded via surface electrodes below the inion, have been proposed as a non-invasive method to assess cerebellar activity. However, its interpretation is complicated by potential interference from occipital alpha rhythms and neck muscle signals. This study aimed to investigate whether ECeG signals genuinely reflect cerebellar involvement during upper limb movement and to explore possible confounding influences. Methods: We recorded electroencephalograms (EEGs) from occipital (Oz) and cerebellar electrodes (Cb1 and Cb2), alongside EMGs from forearm muscles in healthy individuals performing sinusoidal (~1 Hz) and tremor-like (~4 Hz) wrist movements. To assess occipital contamination, recordings were obtained under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Results: Occipital alpha power was present in Cb1 and Cb2 but was less affected by eye-opening than at Oz, suggesting a partially distinct neural source. During the tremor condition, movement-frequency power increased at Cb2 and C3 (corresponding to the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere and contralateral motor cortex), indicating authentic cerebellar activity. No significant movement-related EEG changes were observed during sinusoidal movements, likely due to weaker neuronal synchronization. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ECeGs can detect cerebellar signals linked to movement, especially during faster and rhythmic motions, and are only moderately affected by occipital contamination. This supports the feasibility of non-invasive cerebellar electrophysiology and underscores the need for further methodological refinement to enhance signal specificity.
期刊介绍:
Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.