人类上肢远端小脑控制的表面脑电图证据。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Anna Latorre, Kais Humaidan, Mauro Sanna, Maria Lucrezia Lavena, Sara Pittalis, Clio Raimondi, Elias Paolo Casula, Lorenzo Rocchi
{"title":"人类上肢远端小脑控制的表面脑电图证据。","authors":"Anna Latorre, Kais Humaidan, Mauro Sanna, Maria Lucrezia Lavena, Sara Pittalis, Clio Raimondi, Elias Paolo Casula, Lorenzo Rocchi","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15050440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The cerebellum plays a crucial role in motor control, but its direct electrophysiological investigation in humans is challenging. Electrocerebellograms (ECeGs), recorded via surface electrodes below the inion, have been proposed as a non-invasive method to assess cerebellar activity. However, its interpretation is complicated by potential interference from occipital alpha rhythms and neck muscle signals. This study aimed to investigate whether ECeG signals genuinely reflect cerebellar involvement during upper limb movement and to explore possible confounding influences. <b>Methods</b>: We recorded electroencephalograms (EEGs) from occipital (Oz) and cerebellar electrodes (Cb1 and Cb2), alongside EMGs from forearm muscles in healthy individuals performing sinusoidal (~1 Hz) and tremor-like (~4 Hz) wrist movements. To assess occipital contamination, recordings were obtained under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. <b>Results</b>: Occipital alpha power was present in Cb1 and Cb2 but was less affected by eye-opening than at Oz, suggesting a partially distinct neural source. During the tremor condition, movement-frequency power increased at Cb2 and C3 (corresponding to the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere and contralateral motor cortex), indicating authentic cerebellar activity. No significant movement-related EEG changes were observed during sinusoidal movements, likely due to weaker neuronal synchronization. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that ECeGs can detect cerebellar signals linked to movement, especially during faster and rhythmic motions, and are only moderately affected by occipital contamination. This supports the feasibility of non-invasive cerebellar electrophysiology and underscores the need for further methodological refinement to enhance signal specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface EEG Evidence for Cerebellar Control of Distal Upper Limbs in Humans.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Latorre, Kais Humaidan, Mauro Sanna, Maria Lucrezia Lavena, Sara Pittalis, Clio Raimondi, Elias Paolo Casula, Lorenzo Rocchi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/brainsci15050440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The cerebellum plays a crucial role in motor control, but its direct electrophysiological investigation in humans is challenging. Electrocerebellograms (ECeGs), recorded via surface electrodes below the inion, have been proposed as a non-invasive method to assess cerebellar activity. However, its interpretation is complicated by potential interference from occipital alpha rhythms and neck muscle signals. This study aimed to investigate whether ECeG signals genuinely reflect cerebellar involvement during upper limb movement and to explore possible confounding influences. <b>Methods</b>: We recorded electroencephalograms (EEGs) from occipital (Oz) and cerebellar electrodes (Cb1 and Cb2), alongside EMGs from forearm muscles in healthy individuals performing sinusoidal (~1 Hz) and tremor-like (~4 Hz) wrist movements. To assess occipital contamination, recordings were obtained under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. <b>Results</b>: Occipital alpha power was present in Cb1 and Cb2 but was less affected by eye-opening than at Oz, suggesting a partially distinct neural source. During the tremor condition, movement-frequency power increased at Cb2 and C3 (corresponding to the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere and contralateral motor cortex), indicating authentic cerebellar activity. No significant movement-related EEG changes were observed during sinusoidal movements, likely due to weaker neuronal synchronization. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that ECeGs can detect cerebellar signals linked to movement, especially during faster and rhythmic motions, and are only moderately affected by occipital contamination. This supports the feasibility of non-invasive cerebellar electrophysiology and underscores the need for further methodological refinement to enhance signal specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050440\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:小脑在运动控制中起着至关重要的作用,但其在人类中的直接电生理研究具有挑战性。小脑电图(Electrocerebellograms, ECeGs)是一种通过大脑下方表面电极记录的非侵入性方法,被认为是评估小脑活动的一种方法。然而,枕α节律和颈部肌肉信号的潜在干扰使其解释变得复杂。本研究旨在探讨脑电图信号是否真实反映上肢运动时小脑受累,并探讨可能的混杂影响。方法:在进行正弦波(~ 1hz)和震颤样(~ 4hz)手腕运动的健康个体中,我们记录了枕骨(Oz)和小脑电极(Cb1和Cb2)的脑电图(eeg),以及前臂肌肉的肌电信号。为了评估枕部污染,在睁眼和闭眼条件下均获得记录。结果:Cb1和Cb2的枕叶α能量存在,但受睁眼的影响比Oz小,提示部分不同的神经来源。在震颤状态下,Cb2和C3(对应同侧小脑半球和对侧运动皮层)的运动频率功率增加,表明小脑活动真实。在正弦波运动期间,脑电图未观察到明显的运动相关变化,可能是由于较弱的神经元同步性。结论:这些发现表明,脑电图可以检测到与运动相关的小脑信号,特别是在快速和有节奏的运动中,并且仅受枕部污染的中度影响。这支持了非侵入性小脑电生理学的可行性,并强调了进一步改进方法以增强信号特异性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surface EEG Evidence for Cerebellar Control of Distal Upper Limbs in Humans.

Background/Objectives: The cerebellum plays a crucial role in motor control, but its direct electrophysiological investigation in humans is challenging. Electrocerebellograms (ECeGs), recorded via surface electrodes below the inion, have been proposed as a non-invasive method to assess cerebellar activity. However, its interpretation is complicated by potential interference from occipital alpha rhythms and neck muscle signals. This study aimed to investigate whether ECeG signals genuinely reflect cerebellar involvement during upper limb movement and to explore possible confounding influences. Methods: We recorded electroencephalograms (EEGs) from occipital (Oz) and cerebellar electrodes (Cb1 and Cb2), alongside EMGs from forearm muscles in healthy individuals performing sinusoidal (~1 Hz) and tremor-like (~4 Hz) wrist movements. To assess occipital contamination, recordings were obtained under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Results: Occipital alpha power was present in Cb1 and Cb2 but was less affected by eye-opening than at Oz, suggesting a partially distinct neural source. During the tremor condition, movement-frequency power increased at Cb2 and C3 (corresponding to the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere and contralateral motor cortex), indicating authentic cerebellar activity. No significant movement-related EEG changes were observed during sinusoidal movements, likely due to weaker neuronal synchronization. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ECeGs can detect cerebellar signals linked to movement, especially during faster and rhythmic motions, and are only moderately affected by occipital contamination. This supports the feasibility of non-invasive cerebellar electrophysiology and underscores the need for further methodological refinement to enhance signal specificity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信