中国单胎孕妇适宜妊娠增重比例范围的确定

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yin Jia, Haili Jiang, Yang Yu, Yuhui Fu, Yue Li, Huili Wang
{"title":"中国单胎孕妇适宜妊娠增重比例范围的确定","authors":"Yin Jia,&nbsp;Haili Jiang,&nbsp;Yang Yu,&nbsp;Yuhui Fu,&nbsp;Yue Li,&nbsp;Huili Wang","doi":"10.1002/fsn3.70289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To examine the optimal proportion of gestational weight gain (GWG) for Chinese singleton women based on Chinese body mass index (BMI) categories. A retrospective cohort study with 16,977 singleton pregnant women was conducted. Among the included subjects, 2/3 of whom were randomly imported into the training set for calculating the optimal proportion of GWG ranges, and another third of the women were imported into the validation set to evaluate the GWG ranges calculated with different methods. The detection rate of adverse outcomes of pregnant women with appropriate weight gain proportion under the above three methods was evaluated by paired chi-square test, using the data of pregnant women in the validation database. According to the percentile method, the suitable proportion of GWG of pregnant women with underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obesity before pregnancy was 25.8%–37.8%, 20.3%–30.8%, 13.0%–23.1%, respectively. According to the Odds ratio method, the suitable proportion of GWG for pregnant women with different BMI categories was 24%–34%, 14%–18%, and 4%–14%, respectively. According to the combined risk curve method, the suitable proportion of GWG for pregnant women with different BMI categories was 27.9%–32.5%, 11.5%–16.8%, and −2.1%–5.5%, respectively. When the proportion of GWG ranges from 27.9%–32.5%, 11.5%–16.8%, and −2.1%–5.5% for different BMI categories, the pregnant women with appropriate weight gain proportions have the lowest detection rate of adverse maternal and infant outcomes. The GWG proportion serves as a valuable clinical indicator for enabling personalized weight management strategies and tailored nutritional guidance during pregnancy. The recommended proportion of GWG in this study for underweight, normal, overweight, and obese pregnant women was 27.9%–32.5%, 11.5%–16.8%, and −2.1%–5.5%, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12418,"journal":{"name":"Food Science & Nutrition","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fsn3.70289","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining the Range for Appropriate Gestational Weight Gain Proportion for Singleton Pregnant Chinese Women\",\"authors\":\"Yin Jia,&nbsp;Haili Jiang,&nbsp;Yang Yu,&nbsp;Yuhui Fu,&nbsp;Yue Li,&nbsp;Huili Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fsn3.70289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To examine the optimal proportion of gestational weight gain (GWG) for Chinese singleton women based on Chinese body mass index (BMI) categories. A retrospective cohort study with 16,977 singleton pregnant women was conducted. Among the included subjects, 2/3 of whom were randomly imported into the training set for calculating the optimal proportion of GWG ranges, and another third of the women were imported into the validation set to evaluate the GWG ranges calculated with different methods. The detection rate of adverse outcomes of pregnant women with appropriate weight gain proportion under the above three methods was evaluated by paired chi-square test, using the data of pregnant women in the validation database. According to the percentile method, the suitable proportion of GWG of pregnant women with underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obesity before pregnancy was 25.8%–37.8%, 20.3%–30.8%, 13.0%–23.1%, respectively. According to the Odds ratio method, the suitable proportion of GWG for pregnant women with different BMI categories was 24%–34%, 14%–18%, and 4%–14%, respectively. According to the combined risk curve method, the suitable proportion of GWG for pregnant women with different BMI categories was 27.9%–32.5%, 11.5%–16.8%, and −2.1%–5.5%, respectively. When the proportion of GWG ranges from 27.9%–32.5%, 11.5%–16.8%, and −2.1%–5.5% for different BMI categories, the pregnant women with appropriate weight gain proportions have the lowest detection rate of adverse maternal and infant outcomes. The GWG proportion serves as a valuable clinical indicator for enabling personalized weight management strategies and tailored nutritional guidance during pregnancy. The recommended proportion of GWG in this study for underweight, normal, overweight, and obese pregnant women was 27.9%–32.5%, 11.5%–16.8%, and −2.1%–5.5%, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science & Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fsn3.70289\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science & Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.70289\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.70289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

探讨基于中国体质指数(BMI)分类的中国单身女性妊娠期体重增加的最佳比例。对16977名单胎孕妇进行回顾性队列研究。在纳入的受试者中,2/3的受试者被随机导入训练集,用于计算GWG范围的最优比例,另外1 /3的女性被导入验证集,用于评估不同方法计算的GWG范围。采用验证数据库中孕妇数据,采用配对卡方检验评价上述三种方法下适宜增重比例孕妇不良结局检出率。根据百分位数法,孕前体重过轻、体重正常、体重超重、肥胖孕妇GWG适宜比例分别为25.8% ~ 37.8%、20.3% ~ 30.8%、13.0% ~ 23.1%。根据优势比法,不同BMI类别孕妇的GWG适宜比例分别为24% ~ 34%、14% ~ 18%、4% ~ 14%。根据联合风险曲线法,不同BMI类别孕妇GWG的适宜比例分别为27.9% ~ 32.5%、11.5% ~ 16.8%、- 2.1% ~ 5.5%。不同BMI类别的GWG比例在27.9% ~ 32.5%、11.5% ~ 16.8%、- 2.1% ~ 5.5%范围内时,体重增加比例合适的孕妇不良母婴结局检出率最低。GWG比例是一项有价值的临床指标,可用于实现孕期个性化体重管理策略和量身定制的营养指导。本研究中体重不足、正常、超重和肥胖孕妇的GWG推荐比例分别为27.9%-32.5%、11.5%-16.8%和- 2.1%-5.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining the Range for Appropriate Gestational Weight Gain Proportion for Singleton Pregnant Chinese Women

To examine the optimal proportion of gestational weight gain (GWG) for Chinese singleton women based on Chinese body mass index (BMI) categories. A retrospective cohort study with 16,977 singleton pregnant women was conducted. Among the included subjects, 2/3 of whom were randomly imported into the training set for calculating the optimal proportion of GWG ranges, and another third of the women were imported into the validation set to evaluate the GWG ranges calculated with different methods. The detection rate of adverse outcomes of pregnant women with appropriate weight gain proportion under the above three methods was evaluated by paired chi-square test, using the data of pregnant women in the validation database. According to the percentile method, the suitable proportion of GWG of pregnant women with underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obesity before pregnancy was 25.8%–37.8%, 20.3%–30.8%, 13.0%–23.1%, respectively. According to the Odds ratio method, the suitable proportion of GWG for pregnant women with different BMI categories was 24%–34%, 14%–18%, and 4%–14%, respectively. According to the combined risk curve method, the suitable proportion of GWG for pregnant women with different BMI categories was 27.9%–32.5%, 11.5%–16.8%, and −2.1%–5.5%, respectively. When the proportion of GWG ranges from 27.9%–32.5%, 11.5%–16.8%, and −2.1%–5.5% for different BMI categories, the pregnant women with appropriate weight gain proportions have the lowest detection rate of adverse maternal and infant outcomes. The GWG proportion serves as a valuable clinical indicator for enabling personalized weight management strategies and tailored nutritional guidance during pregnancy. The recommended proportion of GWG in this study for underweight, normal, overweight, and obese pregnant women was 27.9%–32.5%, 11.5%–16.8%, and −2.1%–5.5%, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science & Nutrition
Food Science & Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
434
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Science & Nutrition is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of food science and nutrition. The Journal will consider submissions of quality papers describing the results of fundamental and applied research related to all aspects of human food and nutrition, as well as interdisciplinary research that spans these two fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信