高靶向代谢组学结合RT-qPCR基因表达分析提高了草料、谷物或葡萄饲粮的牛肉分离效果

IF 6.9 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food frontiers Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1002/fft2.70022
Lucas Krusinski, Chloe Castanon, Rosalee S. Hellberg, Isabella C. F. Maciel, Muhammad Ahsin, Stephan van Vliet, Jason E. Rowntree, Jenifer I. Fenton
{"title":"高靶向代谢组学结合RT-qPCR基因表达分析提高了草料、谷物或葡萄饲粮的牛肉分离效果","authors":"Lucas Krusinski,&nbsp;Chloe Castanon,&nbsp;Rosalee S. Hellberg,&nbsp;Isabella C. F. Maciel,&nbsp;Muhammad Ahsin,&nbsp;Stephan van Vliet,&nbsp;Jason E. Rowntree,&nbsp;Jenifer I. Fenton","doi":"10.1002/fft2.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study was to use a multi-omics (i.e., gene expression quantification, metabolomics, and fatty acid [FA] profiling) approach to separate and authenticate beef from three different dietary groups. In this 2-year study, Red Angus steers (<i>n</i> = 54) were randomly allocated to one of three treatments: (1) complex biodiverse pasture (GRASS), (2) total mixed ration (TMR) in feedlot (GRAIN), or (3) TMR in feedlot supplemented with 5% (dry matter) grapeseed extract for the last 30 days (GRAPE). FAs were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS), secondary metabolites were identified using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS), and gene expression analysis was performed using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–qPCR). All target genes were upregulated in beef from GRASS compared to the other two groups. Multivariate analyses showed that long-chain <i>n</i>-3 polyunsaturated FAs, the <i>n</i>-6:<i>n</i>-3 ratio, vitamin E, organic acids, amino acid derivatives, and the nephronectin isoform X1 (<i>NPNT-1</i>) gene were the most important compounds for group separation. These compounds, considered to be beneficial for human health, showed higher concentrations in beef from GRASS. The success of beef separation by dietary treatment was highlighted by the 90.4% prediction accuracy of the random forest model, with beef from GRASS being 100% accurately predicted and beef from GRAPE being 94.4% accurately predicted. Beef from GRAIN was 76.5% accurately predicted. In conclusion, coupling gene expression analysis to metabolomics and FA profiling allowed for the separation of beef samples from varying dietary backgrounds with a high degree of confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":73042,"journal":{"name":"Food frontiers","volume":"6 3","pages":"1483-1497"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Highly Targeted Metabolomics Coupled With Gene Expression Analysis by RT–qPCR Improves Beef Separation Based on Grass, Grain, or Grape Supplemented Diet\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Krusinski,&nbsp;Chloe Castanon,&nbsp;Rosalee S. Hellberg,&nbsp;Isabella C. F. Maciel,&nbsp;Muhammad Ahsin,&nbsp;Stephan van Vliet,&nbsp;Jason E. Rowntree,&nbsp;Jenifer I. Fenton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fft2.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of this study was to use a multi-omics (i.e., gene expression quantification, metabolomics, and fatty acid [FA] profiling) approach to separate and authenticate beef from three different dietary groups. In this 2-year study, Red Angus steers (<i>n</i> = 54) were randomly allocated to one of three treatments: (1) complex biodiverse pasture (GRASS), (2) total mixed ration (TMR) in feedlot (GRAIN), or (3) TMR in feedlot supplemented with 5% (dry matter) grapeseed extract for the last 30 days (GRAPE). FAs were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS), secondary metabolites were identified using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS), and gene expression analysis was performed using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–qPCR). All target genes were upregulated in beef from GRASS compared to the other two groups. Multivariate analyses showed that long-chain <i>n</i>-3 polyunsaturated FAs, the <i>n</i>-6:<i>n</i>-3 ratio, vitamin E, organic acids, amino acid derivatives, and the nephronectin isoform X1 (<i>NPNT-1</i>) gene were the most important compounds for group separation. These compounds, considered to be beneficial for human health, showed higher concentrations in beef from GRASS. The success of beef separation by dietary treatment was highlighted by the 90.4% prediction accuracy of the random forest model, with beef from GRASS being 100% accurately predicted and beef from GRAPE being 94.4% accurately predicted. Beef from GRAIN was 76.5% accurately predicted. In conclusion, coupling gene expression analysis to metabolomics and FA profiling allowed for the separation of beef samples from varying dietary backgrounds with a high degree of confidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food frontiers\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"1483-1497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.70022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.70022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.70022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是使用多组学(即基因表达量化、代谢组学和脂肪酸[FA]分析)方法从三个不同的饮食组中分离和鉴定牛肉。在这项为期2年的研究中,54头红安格斯阉牛被随机分配到3个处理之一:(1)复杂生物多样性牧场(GRASS),(2)饲养场全混合日粮(GRAIN),(3)饲养场添加5%(干物质)葡萄籽提取物(GRAPE)的TMR,最后30天。采用气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)测定FAs,采用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(UPLC-MS /MS)鉴定次生代谢产物,采用定量反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)分析基因表达。与其他两组相比,GRASS牛肉中所有靶基因均上调。多因素分析表明,长链n-3多不饱和脂肪酸、n-6:n-3比值、维生素E、有机酸、氨基酸衍生物和nephronectin亚型X1 (NPNT-1)基因是最重要的基团分离化合物。这些被认为对人体健康有益的化合物,在来自GRASS的牛肉中显示出更高的浓度。随机森林模型的预测准确率为90.4%,其中GRASS牛肉的预测准确率为100%,GRAPE牛肉的预测准确率为94.4%,这突显了饲料处理牛肉分离的成功。谷物牛肉的预测准确率为76.5%。总之,将基因表达分析与代谢组学和FA分析相结合,可以高度可靠地分离不同饮食背景的牛肉样品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Highly Targeted Metabolomics Coupled With Gene Expression Analysis by RT–qPCR Improves Beef Separation Based on Grass, Grain, or Grape Supplemented Diet

Highly Targeted Metabolomics Coupled With Gene Expression Analysis by RT–qPCR Improves Beef Separation Based on Grass, Grain, or Grape Supplemented Diet

The objective of this study was to use a multi-omics (i.e., gene expression quantification, metabolomics, and fatty acid [FA] profiling) approach to separate and authenticate beef from three different dietary groups. In this 2-year study, Red Angus steers (n = 54) were randomly allocated to one of three treatments: (1) complex biodiverse pasture (GRASS), (2) total mixed ration (TMR) in feedlot (GRAIN), or (3) TMR in feedlot supplemented with 5% (dry matter) grapeseed extract for the last 30 days (GRAPE). FAs were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS), secondary metabolites were identified using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS), and gene expression analysis was performed using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–qPCR). All target genes were upregulated in beef from GRASS compared to the other two groups. Multivariate analyses showed that long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated FAs, the n-6:n-3 ratio, vitamin E, organic acids, amino acid derivatives, and the nephronectin isoform X1 (NPNT-1) gene were the most important compounds for group separation. These compounds, considered to be beneficial for human health, showed higher concentrations in beef from GRASS. The success of beef separation by dietary treatment was highlighted by the 90.4% prediction accuracy of the random forest model, with beef from GRASS being 100% accurately predicted and beef from GRAPE being 94.4% accurately predicted. Beef from GRAIN was 76.5% accurately predicted. In conclusion, coupling gene expression analysis to metabolomics and FA profiling allowed for the separation of beef samples from varying dietary backgrounds with a high degree of confidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信