{"title":"医疗专业人员对超快速基因组测序的看法及其在危重儿童临床实践中的应用","authors":"Claire Caillot, Etienne Javouhey, Stéphane Hays, Evan Gouy, Pauline Monin, Gaetan Lesca, Damien Sanlaville, Nicolas Chatron","doi":"10.1038/s41431-025-01869-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The clinical utility of ultra-rapid genome sequencing (urGS) in neonatal and paediatric intensive care situations has been demonstrated, and barriers to its implementation in clinical practice studied. A 38-item questionnaire was distributed via medical professional learned societies to identify the views of French healthcare professionals in the field prior to its implementation. Overall, 116 responses were received: 35% from healthcare professionals working in clinical genetics, 19% in laboratory genetics, and 32% in paediatric or neonatal intensive care units (NICU/PICU). Nearly all (97%) respondents agreed that healthcare professionals should receive specific training before a first test order; 94% considered urGS useful, and 97% that the results would likely modify a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. A multidisciplinary approval of the urGS request was considered necessary by 87% of respondents, and multidisciplinary discussion of the result by 84%; joint disclosing of results by a clinical geneticist and NICU/PICU physician was considered ideal for 91% of respondents, and 78% were against additional findings being disclosed at the same time as the result. For 99% of respondents, psychological assistance was crucial after the result. Based on the results, we propose a workflow to facilitate implementation in a broad range of centres.","PeriodicalId":12016,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Genetics","volume":"33 7","pages":"937-944"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41431-025-01869-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"View of healthcare professionals on ultra-rapid genome sequencing and its future implementation in clinical practice for critically ill children\",\"authors\":\"Claire Caillot, Etienne Javouhey, Stéphane Hays, Evan Gouy, Pauline Monin, Gaetan Lesca, Damien Sanlaville, Nicolas Chatron\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41431-025-01869-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The clinical utility of ultra-rapid genome sequencing (urGS) in neonatal and paediatric intensive care situations has been demonstrated, and barriers to its implementation in clinical practice studied. A 38-item questionnaire was distributed via medical professional learned societies to identify the views of French healthcare professionals in the field prior to its implementation. Overall, 116 responses were received: 35% from healthcare professionals working in clinical genetics, 19% in laboratory genetics, and 32% in paediatric or neonatal intensive care units (NICU/PICU). Nearly all (97%) respondents agreed that healthcare professionals should receive specific training before a first test order; 94% considered urGS useful, and 97% that the results would likely modify a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. A multidisciplinary approval of the urGS request was considered necessary by 87% of respondents, and multidisciplinary discussion of the result by 84%; joint disclosing of results by a clinical geneticist and NICU/PICU physician was considered ideal for 91% of respondents, and 78% were against additional findings being disclosed at the same time as the result. For 99% of respondents, psychological assistance was crucial after the result. Based on the results, we propose a workflow to facilitate implementation in a broad range of centres.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Human Genetics\",\"volume\":\"33 7\",\"pages\":\"937-944\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41431-025-01869-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41431-025-01869-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41431-025-01869-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
View of healthcare professionals on ultra-rapid genome sequencing and its future implementation in clinical practice for critically ill children
The clinical utility of ultra-rapid genome sequencing (urGS) in neonatal and paediatric intensive care situations has been demonstrated, and barriers to its implementation in clinical practice studied. A 38-item questionnaire was distributed via medical professional learned societies to identify the views of French healthcare professionals in the field prior to its implementation. Overall, 116 responses were received: 35% from healthcare professionals working in clinical genetics, 19% in laboratory genetics, and 32% in paediatric or neonatal intensive care units (NICU/PICU). Nearly all (97%) respondents agreed that healthcare professionals should receive specific training before a first test order; 94% considered urGS useful, and 97% that the results would likely modify a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. A multidisciplinary approval of the urGS request was considered necessary by 87% of respondents, and multidisciplinary discussion of the result by 84%; joint disclosing of results by a clinical geneticist and NICU/PICU physician was considered ideal for 91% of respondents, and 78% were against additional findings being disclosed at the same time as the result. For 99% of respondents, psychological assistance was crucial after the result. Based on the results, we propose a workflow to facilitate implementation in a broad range of centres.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Human Genetics is the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics, publishing high-quality, original research papers, short reports and reviews in the rapidly expanding field of human genetics and genomics. It covers molecular, clinical and cytogenetics, interfacing between advanced biomedical research and the clinician, and bridging the great diversity of facilities, resources and viewpoints in the genetics community.
Key areas include:
-Monogenic and multifactorial disorders
-Development and malformation
-Hereditary cancer
-Medical Genomics
-Gene mapping and functional studies
-Genotype-phenotype correlations
-Genetic variation and genome diversity
-Statistical and computational genetics
-Bioinformatics
-Advances in diagnostics
-Therapy and prevention
-Animal models
-Genetic services
-Community genetics