COVID-19疫苗接种背景下模糊厌恶心理相关因素的测试:动机推理和评价倾向框架的证据

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Nicolle Simonovic, Anat Gesser-Edelsburg, Jennifer M Taber
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗接种背景下模糊厌恶心理相关因素的测试:动机推理和评价倾向框架的证据","authors":"Nicolle Simonovic, Anat Gesser-Edelsburg, Jennifer M Taber","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2025.2497808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceiving ambiguity-a specific type of uncertainty-can lead to ambiguity aversion. In the context of vaccination, ambiguity aversion can manifest as vaccine hesitancy. We tested various correlates of ambiguity aversion in the context of COVID-19 vaccination to better understand how and why ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines is associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Two studies regarding beliefs about COVID-19 were conducted among 330 college students in the US and 204 college students in Israel during March to June 2023. Participants completed a survey assessing perceived ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines, COVID-19 risk perceptions (i.e., likelihood, severity, and worry), emotions about COVID-19 vaccines, vaccination intentions, and information seeking about vaccination. Overall, key findings include higher levels of anger among individuals who report higher perceived ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccination, as well as possible engagement in motivated reasoning processes when considering COVID-19 vaccination. More specifically, consistent with motivated reasoning, Americans who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported lower worry about and lower perceived severity of COVID-19, which were each associated with lower vaccination intentions and lower information seeking about COVID-19 vaccines. In line with the Appraisal-Tendency Framework, Americans who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported higher anger about COVID-19 vaccines, which was associated with lower perceived severity of COVID-19. Consistent with conceptualizing ambiguity as an aversive experience, Americans who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported lower happiness about COVID-19 vaccines, which was associated with both lower worry about and lower perceived severity of COVID-19. These relationships were not present in the Israeli sample. Further, both Americans and Israelis who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported lower feelings of relaxation from the COVID-19 vaccine, which was associated with lower perceived severity of COVID-19. These results can improve our understanding of processes involved in ambiguity aversion. Findings also provide greater insight into vaccine hesitancy and have practical implications for creating culturally appropriate vaccine health communications and interventions that consider the phenomenon of ambiguity aversion. Indeed, if motivated reasoning does play a role in responses to ambiguity, incorporating strategies to reduce motivated reasoning may contribute to vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Psychological Correlates of Ambiguity Aversion in the Context of COVID-19 Vaccination: Evidence for Motivated Reasoning and the Appraisal-Tendency Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolle Simonovic, Anat Gesser-Edelsburg, Jennifer M Taber\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08964289.2025.2497808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Perceiving ambiguity-a specific type of uncertainty-can lead to ambiguity aversion. In the context of vaccination, ambiguity aversion can manifest as vaccine hesitancy. We tested various correlates of ambiguity aversion in the context of COVID-19 vaccination to better understand how and why ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines is associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Two studies regarding beliefs about COVID-19 were conducted among 330 college students in the US and 204 college students in Israel during March to June 2023. Participants completed a survey assessing perceived ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines, COVID-19 risk perceptions (i.e., likelihood, severity, and worry), emotions about COVID-19 vaccines, vaccination intentions, and information seeking about vaccination. Overall, key findings include higher levels of anger among individuals who report higher perceived ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccination, as well as possible engagement in motivated reasoning processes when considering COVID-19 vaccination. More specifically, consistent with motivated reasoning, Americans who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported lower worry about and lower perceived severity of COVID-19, which were each associated with lower vaccination intentions and lower information seeking about COVID-19 vaccines. In line with the Appraisal-Tendency Framework, Americans who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported higher anger about COVID-19 vaccines, which was associated with lower perceived severity of COVID-19. Consistent with conceptualizing ambiguity as an aversive experience, Americans who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported lower happiness about COVID-19 vaccines, which was associated with both lower worry about and lower perceived severity of COVID-19. These relationships were not present in the Israeli sample. Further, both Americans and Israelis who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported lower feelings of relaxation from the COVID-19 vaccine, which was associated with lower perceived severity of COVID-19. These results can improve our understanding of processes involved in ambiguity aversion. Findings also provide greater insight into vaccine hesitancy and have practical implications for creating culturally appropriate vaccine health communications and interventions that consider the phenomenon of ambiguity aversion. Indeed, if motivated reasoning does play a role in responses to ambiguity, incorporating strategies to reduce motivated reasoning may contribute to vaccine uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2025.2497808\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2025.2497808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感知模糊性——一种特定类型的不确定性——会导致模糊性厌恶。在疫苗接种的背景下,模糊性厌恶可以表现为疫苗犹豫。我们在COVID-19疫苗接种的背景下测试了歧义厌恶的各种相关因素,以更好地了解COVID-19疫苗的歧义如何以及为什么与COVID-19疫苗犹豫相关。在2023年3月至6月期间,对330名美国大学生和204名以色列大学生进行了两项关于COVID-19信念的研究。参与者完成了一项调查,评估对COVID-19疫苗的感知模糊性、COVID-19风险感知(即可能性、严重程度和担忧)、对COVID-19疫苗的情绪、疫苗接种意图和疫苗接种信息的寻求。总体而言,主要发现包括,在报告对COVID-19疫苗接种的模糊性较高的个人中,愤怒程度较高,以及在考虑COVID-19疫苗接种时可能参与动机推理过程。更具体地说,与动机推理一致,对COVID-19疫苗感到更模糊的美国人报告了更低的担忧和更低的COVID-19严重程度,这两者都与较低的疫苗接种意愿和较低的COVID-19疫苗信息寻求相关。根据评估倾向框架,对COVID-19疫苗有更高模糊性的美国人报告对COVID-19疫苗的愤怒程度更高,这与较低的COVID-19严重程度相关。与将模糊性概念化为一种厌恶的体验相一致,对COVID-19疫苗有较高模糊性的美国人对COVID-19疫苗的满意度较低,这与对COVID-19的担忧程度较低和感知程度较低有关。这些关系在以色列的样本中不存在。此外,对COVID-19疫苗的模糊性较高的美国人和以色列人都报告说,COVID-19疫苗的放松感较低,这与COVID-19的严重程度较低有关。这些结果可以提高我们对歧义厌恶过程的理解。研究结果还对疫苗犹豫提供了更深入的了解,并对创建文化上适当的疫苗卫生交流和考虑歧义厌恶现象的干预措施具有实际意义。事实上,如果动机推理确实在对模糊性的反应中发挥作用,那么结合减少动机推理的策略可能有助于疫苗的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing Psychological Correlates of Ambiguity Aversion in the Context of COVID-19 Vaccination: Evidence for Motivated Reasoning and the Appraisal-Tendency Framework.

Perceiving ambiguity-a specific type of uncertainty-can lead to ambiguity aversion. In the context of vaccination, ambiguity aversion can manifest as vaccine hesitancy. We tested various correlates of ambiguity aversion in the context of COVID-19 vaccination to better understand how and why ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines is associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Two studies regarding beliefs about COVID-19 were conducted among 330 college students in the US and 204 college students in Israel during March to June 2023. Participants completed a survey assessing perceived ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines, COVID-19 risk perceptions (i.e., likelihood, severity, and worry), emotions about COVID-19 vaccines, vaccination intentions, and information seeking about vaccination. Overall, key findings include higher levels of anger among individuals who report higher perceived ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccination, as well as possible engagement in motivated reasoning processes when considering COVID-19 vaccination. More specifically, consistent with motivated reasoning, Americans who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported lower worry about and lower perceived severity of COVID-19, which were each associated with lower vaccination intentions and lower information seeking about COVID-19 vaccines. In line with the Appraisal-Tendency Framework, Americans who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported higher anger about COVID-19 vaccines, which was associated with lower perceived severity of COVID-19. Consistent with conceptualizing ambiguity as an aversive experience, Americans who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported lower happiness about COVID-19 vaccines, which was associated with both lower worry about and lower perceived severity of COVID-19. These relationships were not present in the Israeli sample. Further, both Americans and Israelis who perceived higher ambiguity about COVID-19 vaccines reported lower feelings of relaxation from the COVID-19 vaccine, which was associated with lower perceived severity of COVID-19. These results can improve our understanding of processes involved in ambiguity aversion. Findings also provide greater insight into vaccine hesitancy and have practical implications for creating culturally appropriate vaccine health communications and interventions that consider the phenomenon of ambiguity aversion. Indeed, if motivated reasoning does play a role in responses to ambiguity, incorporating strategies to reduce motivated reasoning may contribute to vaccine uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Medicine
Behavioral Medicine 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states. Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信