{"title":"抑郁症情绪聚焦与认知行为治疗中参照过程话语属性的探讨。","authors":"Jinny Hong, Jeanne C Watson","doi":"10.1007/s10936-025-10151-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Referential process (RP) refers to how nonverbal experiences are translated into verbal forms, and it has been proposed as a foundational framework for understanding psychotherapeutic change (Bucci, 1993; Bucci, Maskit, & Murphy, 2016; Bucci, 2013). While most of the prior research has examined RP in the context of psychodynamic psychotherapy and single-case designs, the current study examined RP in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Emotion Focused Therapy (EFT) for 40 depressed clients. The Discourse Attributes Analysis Program (DAAP; Maskit, Bucci, & Murphy, 2012) was employed to evaluate discourse attributes within 80 session transcripts. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) was used to analyze the data. There was a higher occurrence of affect words in EFT transcripts and a higher occurrence of reflection words in CBT transcripts reflecting each approach's theory of change. The results of the study highlighted the therapists' ability to effectively connect to their experiences and articulate themselves clearly to clients. Among the highest client-rated sessions, therapists of good outcome clients used more concrete, imagistic, specific, and clear language compared to therapists of poor outcome clients. Therapists of the good outcome group had higher WRADM (weighted referential activity mean) scores ((β =.018, p =.006) and WRADHP (weighted referential activity high proportion) scores (β =.059, p =.008). Moreover, clients' session ratings increased as therapists' WRADM (β = 15.08, p =.017) and WRADHP (β = 4.12, p =.032) increased. Contrary to the hypotheses, clients' WRADM, WRADHP, and WRAD/WRRL did not differ between highest and lowest-rated sessions, nor did they predict clients' session ratings. Clients in the two outcome groups also did not differ in terms of how much they symbolized and then reflected on their experiences. Clinical, theoretical, and measurement implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","volume":"54 3","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Discourse Attributes of Referential Process in Emotion Focused and Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for Depression.\",\"authors\":\"Jinny Hong, Jeanne C Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10936-025-10151-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Referential process (RP) refers to how nonverbal experiences are translated into verbal forms, and it has been proposed as a foundational framework for understanding psychotherapeutic change (Bucci, 1993; Bucci, Maskit, & Murphy, 2016; Bucci, 2013). While most of the prior research has examined RP in the context of psychodynamic psychotherapy and single-case designs, the current study examined RP in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Emotion Focused Therapy (EFT) for 40 depressed clients. The Discourse Attributes Analysis Program (DAAP; Maskit, Bucci, & Murphy, 2012) was employed to evaluate discourse attributes within 80 session transcripts. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) was used to analyze the data. There was a higher occurrence of affect words in EFT transcripts and a higher occurrence of reflection words in CBT transcripts reflecting each approach's theory of change. The results of the study highlighted the therapists' ability to effectively connect to their experiences and articulate themselves clearly to clients. Among the highest client-rated sessions, therapists of good outcome clients used more concrete, imagistic, specific, and clear language compared to therapists of poor outcome clients. Therapists of the good outcome group had higher WRADM (weighted referential activity mean) scores ((β =.018, p =.006) and WRADHP (weighted referential activity high proportion) scores (β =.059, p =.008). Moreover, clients' session ratings increased as therapists' WRADM (β = 15.08, p =.017) and WRADHP (β = 4.12, p =.032) increased. Contrary to the hypotheses, clients' WRADM, WRADHP, and WRAD/WRRL did not differ between highest and lowest-rated sessions, nor did they predict clients' session ratings. Clients in the two outcome groups also did not differ in terms of how much they symbolized and then reflected on their experiences. Clinical, theoretical, and measurement implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-025-10151-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-025-10151-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
参考过程(RP)指的是非语言体验如何转化为语言形式,它已被提出作为理解心理治疗变化的基础框架(Bucci, 1993;Bucci, Maskit, & Murphy, 2016;Bucci, 2013)。先前的大多数研究都是在心理动力学心理治疗和单例设计的背景下研究RP,而目前的研究在40名抑郁症患者的认知行为治疗(CBT)和情绪集中治疗(EFT)中研究RP。语篇属性分析程序;Maskit, Bucci, & Murphy, 2012)被用来评估80个会话记录中的话语属性。采用广义估计方程(GEE)对数据进行分析。EFT转录本中情感词的出现率较高,CBT转录本中反思词的出现率较高,反映了两种方法的变化理论。研究结果强调了治疗师有效地将自己的经历联系起来,并向客户清晰表达自己的能力。在来访者评价最高的疗程中,治疗效果好的来访者的治疗师比治疗效果差的来访者的治疗师使用更具体、更形象、更具体和更清晰的语言。结果良好组的治疗师有较高的WRADM(加权参考活动平均值)得分((β =)。018, p =.006)和WRADHP(加权参考活性高比例)评分(β =。059, p =.008)。此外,来访者的会话评分随着治疗师WRADM (β = 15.08, p = 0.017)和WRADHP (β = 4.12, p = 0.032)的增加而增加。与假设相反,客户的WRADM、WRADHP和WRAD/WRRL在最高和最低评分的会话之间没有差异,它们也不能预测客户的会话评分。两个结果组的客户在他们象征的程度以及他们对自己经历的反思方面也没有什么不同。讨论了临床、理论和测量的意义、局限性和未来研究的方向。
Exploring the Discourse Attributes of Referential Process in Emotion Focused and Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for Depression.
Referential process (RP) refers to how nonverbal experiences are translated into verbal forms, and it has been proposed as a foundational framework for understanding psychotherapeutic change (Bucci, 1993; Bucci, Maskit, & Murphy, 2016; Bucci, 2013). While most of the prior research has examined RP in the context of psychodynamic psychotherapy and single-case designs, the current study examined RP in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Emotion Focused Therapy (EFT) for 40 depressed clients. The Discourse Attributes Analysis Program (DAAP; Maskit, Bucci, & Murphy, 2012) was employed to evaluate discourse attributes within 80 session transcripts. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) was used to analyze the data. There was a higher occurrence of affect words in EFT transcripts and a higher occurrence of reflection words in CBT transcripts reflecting each approach's theory of change. The results of the study highlighted the therapists' ability to effectively connect to their experiences and articulate themselves clearly to clients. Among the highest client-rated sessions, therapists of good outcome clients used more concrete, imagistic, specific, and clear language compared to therapists of poor outcome clients. Therapists of the good outcome group had higher WRADM (weighted referential activity mean) scores ((β =.018, p =.006) and WRADHP (weighted referential activity high proportion) scores (β =.059, p =.008). Moreover, clients' session ratings increased as therapists' WRADM (β = 15.08, p =.017) and WRADHP (β = 4.12, p =.032) increased. Contrary to the hypotheses, clients' WRADM, WRADHP, and WRAD/WRRL did not differ between highest and lowest-rated sessions, nor did they predict clients' session ratings. Clients in the two outcome groups also did not differ in terms of how much they symbolized and then reflected on their experiences. Clinical, theoretical, and measurement implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research publishes carefully selected papers from the several disciplines engaged in psycholinguistic research, providing a single, recognized medium for communications among linguists, psychologists, biologists, sociologists, and others. The journal covers a broad range of approaches to the study of the communicative process, including: the social and anthropological bases of communication; development of speech and language; semantics (problems in linguistic meaning); and biological foundations. Papers dealing with the psychopathology of language and cognition, and the neuropsychology of language and cognition, are also included.