面对面治疗与远程治疗的语音节奏和语言风格变化。

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Henry Peterson
{"title":"面对面治疗与远程治疗的语音节奏和语言风格变化。","authors":"Henry Peterson","doi":"10.1007/s10936-025-10157-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined differences in clinical process-as measured via pause length and frequency, and language-style-between in-person and Zoom treatment formats in the psychodynamic treatment of a man with a diagnosis of Body Dysmorphic Disorder. While the COVID-19 pandemic saw the widespread adoption of remote videoconferencing software across a range of talk therapy formats, differences in clinical process between Zoom and in-person treatment formats still have not been widely investigated. This study examined turn-taking dynamics in therapy, a development with ramifications for clinical process as conceptualized via the Referential Process construct of Multiple Code Theory. This study is the first application of the new T-DAAP, the Time-based Discourse Attributes Analysis Program, which analyzes transcripts using measures of Referential Process functions-Arousal, Symbolizing, and Reflecting/Reorganizing-in terms of elapsed time rather than standard methods based on word count. Differences in number and length of pauses, and Referential Process measures (WRAD and WRRL) were compared between 8 in-person and 8 Zoom sessions from the Spring of 2020. Mean pause length was significantly lower in the Zoom condition than in the in-person condition, for both participants, for both within-, and between-speakers pauses. The patient also showed a larger number of turn-taking pauses, and a higher level of Reflection in the Zoom condition, while other Referential Process measures remained largely consistent for the two participants. Ramifications for the understanding of clinical process were explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":47689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","volume":"54 3","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Speech Rhythm and Language-Style Between In-Person and Remote Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Henry Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10936-025-10157-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined differences in clinical process-as measured via pause length and frequency, and language-style-between in-person and Zoom treatment formats in the psychodynamic treatment of a man with a diagnosis of Body Dysmorphic Disorder. While the COVID-19 pandemic saw the widespread adoption of remote videoconferencing software across a range of talk therapy formats, differences in clinical process between Zoom and in-person treatment formats still have not been widely investigated. This study examined turn-taking dynamics in therapy, a development with ramifications for clinical process as conceptualized via the Referential Process construct of Multiple Code Theory. This study is the first application of the new T-DAAP, the Time-based Discourse Attributes Analysis Program, which analyzes transcripts using measures of Referential Process functions-Arousal, Symbolizing, and Reflecting/Reorganizing-in terms of elapsed time rather than standard methods based on word count. Differences in number and length of pauses, and Referential Process measures (WRAD and WRRL) were compared between 8 in-person and 8 Zoom sessions from the Spring of 2020. Mean pause length was significantly lower in the Zoom condition than in the in-person condition, for both participants, for both within-, and between-speakers pauses. The patient also showed a larger number of turn-taking pauses, and a higher level of Reflection in the Zoom condition, while other Referential Process measures remained largely consistent for the two participants. Ramifications for the understanding of clinical process were explored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-025-10157-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-025-10157-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了一名身体畸形障碍患者的心理动力学治疗中,面对面治疗和Zoom治疗形式在临床过程中的差异——通过暂停时间、频率和语言风格来衡量。尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,远程视频会议软件在一系列谈话治疗形式中得到了广泛采用,但Zoom和面对面治疗形式在临床过程中的差异仍未得到广泛研究。本研究考察了治疗中的轮流动力学,这是一种通过多重密码理论的参考过程结构概念化的临床过程分支的发展。这项研究是新T-DAAP(基于时间的话语属性分析程序)的第一个应用,它使用参考过程功能(唤醒、象征化和反映/重组)的测量来分析文本,而不是基于单词计数的标准方法。比较了从2020年春季开始的8次面对面会议和8次Zoom会议在暂停次数和长度以及参考流程措施(WRAD和WRRL)方面的差异。Zoom条件下的平均停顿长度明显低于面对面条件下的平均停顿长度,对于两名参与者来说,在说话者之间和说话者之间的停顿都是如此。在变焦条件下,患者也表现出更多的轮流停顿和更高水平的反射,而其他参考过程的测量在两名参与者中基本保持一致。对临床过程理解的影响进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Speech Rhythm and Language-Style Between In-Person and Remote Treatment.

This study examined differences in clinical process-as measured via pause length and frequency, and language-style-between in-person and Zoom treatment formats in the psychodynamic treatment of a man with a diagnosis of Body Dysmorphic Disorder. While the COVID-19 pandemic saw the widespread adoption of remote videoconferencing software across a range of talk therapy formats, differences in clinical process between Zoom and in-person treatment formats still have not been widely investigated. This study examined turn-taking dynamics in therapy, a development with ramifications for clinical process as conceptualized via the Referential Process construct of Multiple Code Theory. This study is the first application of the new T-DAAP, the Time-based Discourse Attributes Analysis Program, which analyzes transcripts using measures of Referential Process functions-Arousal, Symbolizing, and Reflecting/Reorganizing-in terms of elapsed time rather than standard methods based on word count. Differences in number and length of pauses, and Referential Process measures (WRAD and WRRL) were compared between 8 in-person and 8 Zoom sessions from the Spring of 2020. Mean pause length was significantly lower in the Zoom condition than in the in-person condition, for both participants, for both within-, and between-speakers pauses. The patient also showed a larger number of turn-taking pauses, and a higher level of Reflection in the Zoom condition, while other Referential Process measures remained largely consistent for the two participants. Ramifications for the understanding of clinical process were explored.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research publishes carefully selected papers from the several disciplines engaged in psycholinguistic research, providing a single, recognized medium for communications among linguists, psychologists, biologists, sociologists, and others. The journal covers a broad range of approaches to the study of the communicative process, including: the social and anthropological bases of communication; development of speech and language; semantics (problems in linguistic meaning); and biological foundations. Papers dealing with the psychopathology of language and cognition, and the neuropsychology of language and cognition, are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信