成人智力障碍和自闭症谱系障碍的骨折特征为骨折预防策略提供信息:一项描述性研究。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sahil A Jha, Shannen M Bolde, Edward A Hurvitz, Michelle S Caird, Daniel G Whitney
{"title":"成人智力障碍和自闭症谱系障碍的骨折特征为骨折预防策略提供信息:一项描述性研究。","authors":"Sahil A Jha, Shannen M Bolde, Edward A Hurvitz, Michelle S Caird, Daniel G Whitney","doi":"10.1111/jir.13255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have a higher risk of fracture; yet little is known about key fracture characteristics that may inform fracture prevention efforts. The objective was to describe the reported activities that lead to a fracture event, the energy of fractures (e.g., low-energy such as fragility fractures and high-energy such as fractures from a motor vehicle accident) and the location of fractures for adults with ID and ASD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study from the United States, medical records from a single clinical site were abstracted to gather information on fracture characteristics (i.e., fracture location, energy of fracture and activities that lead to the fracture event) from adults ≥ 18 years old with intellectual disabilities (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorders (ASD) that sustained ≥ 1 fracture between 1 November 2012 and 2 November 2021. The fracture characteristics were described for the entire cohort and by the following subgroups: ID only, ASD only and ID + ASD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 126 adults with ID and/or ASD, there were a total of 147 fractures for analysis: 84.9% had one fracture, 13.5% had two fractures and 1.6% had three fractures. For the entire cohort, 32.0% were defined as high-energy fractures, but this varied by subgroup: 24.1% for ID only (n = 69 participants, n = 87 fractures), 50.0% for ASD only (n = 35 participants, n = 36 fractures) and 33.3% for ID + ASD (n = 22 participants, n = 24 fractures). The remaining fractures were defined as low-energy or unknown energy. The most common activities that lead to a fracture event were broadly categorised as 'low-impact falls, unwitnessed falls, transfers' for ID only (47.1%), ASD only (27.8%) and ID + ASD (41.7%). The most common skeletal region of fractures occurred in the lower extremities for ID only (42.5%) and ID + ASD (50.0%) and in the upper extremities for ASD only (33.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the age being 18 years and older (i.e., not exclusively elderly), most fractures were considered to be low-energy and occurred in the extremities, but this varied by subgroup. This study identified the activities that led to a fracture event, which may inform fracture prevention efforts such as adjunct therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fracture Characteristics Among Adults With Intellectual Disabilities and Autism Spectrum Disorders to Inform Fracture Prevention Strategies: A Descriptive Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sahil A Jha, Shannen M Bolde, Edward A Hurvitz, Michelle S Caird, Daniel G Whitney\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.13255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have a higher risk of fracture; yet little is known about key fracture characteristics that may inform fracture prevention efforts. The objective was to describe the reported activities that lead to a fracture event, the energy of fractures (e.g., low-energy such as fragility fractures and high-energy such as fractures from a motor vehicle accident) and the location of fractures for adults with ID and ASD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study from the United States, medical records from a single clinical site were abstracted to gather information on fracture characteristics (i.e., fracture location, energy of fracture and activities that lead to the fracture event) from adults ≥ 18 years old with intellectual disabilities (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorders (ASD) that sustained ≥ 1 fracture between 1 November 2012 and 2 November 2021. The fracture characteristics were described for the entire cohort and by the following subgroups: ID only, ASD only and ID + ASD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 126 adults with ID and/or ASD, there were a total of 147 fractures for analysis: 84.9% had one fracture, 13.5% had two fractures and 1.6% had three fractures. For the entire cohort, 32.0% were defined as high-energy fractures, but this varied by subgroup: 24.1% for ID only (n = 69 participants, n = 87 fractures), 50.0% for ASD only (n = 35 participants, n = 36 fractures) and 33.3% for ID + ASD (n = 22 participants, n = 24 fractures). The remaining fractures were defined as low-energy or unknown energy. The most common activities that lead to a fracture event were broadly categorised as 'low-impact falls, unwitnessed falls, transfers' for ID only (47.1%), ASD only (27.8%) and ID + ASD (41.7%). The most common skeletal region of fractures occurred in the lower extremities for ID only (42.5%) and ID + ASD (50.0%) and in the upper extremities for ASD only (33.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the age being 18 years and older (i.e., not exclusively elderly), most fractures were considered to be low-energy and occurred in the extremities, but this varied by subgroup. This study identified the activities that led to a fracture event, which may inform fracture prevention efforts such as adjunct therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13255\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:成人智力障碍(ID)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)有较高的骨折风险;然而,人们对裂缝的关键特征知之甚少,这些特征可能有助于预防裂缝的发生。目的是描述已报道的导致骨折事件的活动,骨折的能量(例如,低能骨折,如易碎性骨折和高能量骨折,如机动车事故造成的骨折)以及患有ID和ASD的成人骨折的位置。方法:在这项来自美国的回顾性队列研究中,从单个临床站点提取医疗记录,收集2012年11月1日至2021年11月2日期间发生≥1次骨折的智力残疾(ID)和/或自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)≥18岁成人的骨折特征信息(即骨折位置、骨折能量和导致骨折事件的活动)。整个队列的骨折特征被描述为以下亚组:仅ID、仅ASD和ID + ASD。结果:在126例成人ID和/或ASD中,共有147例骨折进行分析:84.9%为1例骨折,13.5%为2例骨折,1.6%为3例骨折。在整个队列中,32.0%被定义为高能骨折,但这一比例因亚组而异:仅ID为24.1% (n = 69名参与者,n = 87例骨折),仅ASD为50.0% (n = 35名参与者,n = 36例骨折),ID + ASD为33.3% (n = 22名参与者,n = 24例骨折)。剩余的骨折被定义为低能量或未知能量。最常见的导致骨折事件的活动大致分为“低冲击跌倒、未目击跌倒、转移”,仅为ID(47.1%)、仅为ASD(27.8%)和ID + ASD(41.7%)。最常见的骨折发生在下肢,仅为ID(42.5%)和ID + ASD(50.0%),仅为ASD的上肢(33.3%)。结论:尽管年龄在18岁及以上(即不完全是老年人),大多数骨折被认为是低能性的,发生在四肢,但这在亚组中有所不同。该研究确定了导致骨折事件的活动,这可能为骨折预防工作(如辅助治疗)提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fracture Characteristics Among Adults With Intellectual Disabilities and Autism Spectrum Disorders to Inform Fracture Prevention Strategies: A Descriptive Study.

Background: Adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have a higher risk of fracture; yet little is known about key fracture characteristics that may inform fracture prevention efforts. The objective was to describe the reported activities that lead to a fracture event, the energy of fractures (e.g., low-energy such as fragility fractures and high-energy such as fractures from a motor vehicle accident) and the location of fractures for adults with ID and ASD.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study from the United States, medical records from a single clinical site were abstracted to gather information on fracture characteristics (i.e., fracture location, energy of fracture and activities that lead to the fracture event) from adults ≥ 18 years old with intellectual disabilities (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorders (ASD) that sustained ≥ 1 fracture between 1 November 2012 and 2 November 2021. The fracture characteristics were described for the entire cohort and by the following subgroups: ID only, ASD only and ID + ASD.

Results: Of the 126 adults with ID and/or ASD, there were a total of 147 fractures for analysis: 84.9% had one fracture, 13.5% had two fractures and 1.6% had three fractures. For the entire cohort, 32.0% were defined as high-energy fractures, but this varied by subgroup: 24.1% for ID only (n = 69 participants, n = 87 fractures), 50.0% for ASD only (n = 35 participants, n = 36 fractures) and 33.3% for ID + ASD (n = 22 participants, n = 24 fractures). The remaining fractures were defined as low-energy or unknown energy. The most common activities that lead to a fracture event were broadly categorised as 'low-impact falls, unwitnessed falls, transfers' for ID only (47.1%), ASD only (27.8%) and ID + ASD (41.7%). The most common skeletal region of fractures occurred in the lower extremities for ID only (42.5%) and ID + ASD (50.0%) and in the upper extremities for ASD only (33.3%).

Conclusions: Despite the age being 18 years and older (i.e., not exclusively elderly), most fractures were considered to be low-energy and occurred in the extremities, but this varied by subgroup. This study identified the activities that led to a fracture event, which may inform fracture prevention efforts such as adjunct therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信