肥料、土壤健康和经济冲击:最近证据的综合

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Kibrom A. Abay , Jordan Chamberlin , Pauline Chivenge , David J. Spielman
{"title":"肥料、土壤健康和经济冲击:最近证据的综合","authors":"Kibrom A. Abay ,&nbsp;Jordan Chamberlin ,&nbsp;Pauline Chivenge ,&nbsp;David J. Spielman","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Most countries, at all stages of development, adopt policies to improve agricultural productivity through the application of inorganic fertilizer and the management of soil health. Unfortunately, global and local economic shocks can quickly erode the impact of these policies, as was evident during the global food, fuel, and fertilizer price crisis that began in 2020. This paper synthesizes recent evidence on the magnitude and distribution of—and responses to— the recent shocks to international fertilizer markets, building on evidence from this Special Issue of <em>Food Policy</em> and other recent contributions to the literature. The available evidence suggests that although international fertilizer prices increased dramatically in 2020–2022 and remained above their pre-COVID-19 pandemic level through 2024, the medium-term effects on global fertilizer demand were relatively modest. However, global aggregates obscure important short-term effects, including reduced fertilizer use and lower farm profits in smallholder production systems in many low- and middle-income countries. Although these effects varied considerably by country, dependence on fertilizer imports and vulnerability to idiosyncratic domestic shocks likely played a key role in driving these effects. The evidence synthesized in this paper reveals varying responses (across countries and farmers) and patterns of price transmission (across local and international markets) while also highlighting the potential of fertilizer subsidy programs and other policy interventions to mitigate the effects of fertilizer price volatility and improve soil health, particularly in the midst of a climate crisis that adds uncertainty to agricultural production. From a longer-term perspective, much research is still needed to unpack the effects of this crisis—and the possible effects of future crises—on the international transmission of fertilizer price shocks, policy response options to both immediate shocks and more protracted threats, farm-level strategies to increase resilience to these shocks and to encourage more judicious fertilizer use and soil health management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 102892"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fertilizer, soil health, and economic shocks: A synthesis of recent evidence\",\"authors\":\"Kibrom A. Abay ,&nbsp;Jordan Chamberlin ,&nbsp;Pauline Chivenge ,&nbsp;David J. Spielman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Most countries, at all stages of development, adopt policies to improve agricultural productivity through the application of inorganic fertilizer and the management of soil health. Unfortunately, global and local economic shocks can quickly erode the impact of these policies, as was evident during the global food, fuel, and fertilizer price crisis that began in 2020. This paper synthesizes recent evidence on the magnitude and distribution of—and responses to— the recent shocks to international fertilizer markets, building on evidence from this Special Issue of <em>Food Policy</em> and other recent contributions to the literature. The available evidence suggests that although international fertilizer prices increased dramatically in 2020–2022 and remained above their pre-COVID-19 pandemic level through 2024, the medium-term effects on global fertilizer demand were relatively modest. However, global aggregates obscure important short-term effects, including reduced fertilizer use and lower farm profits in smallholder production systems in many low- and middle-income countries. Although these effects varied considerably by country, dependence on fertilizer imports and vulnerability to idiosyncratic domestic shocks likely played a key role in driving these effects. The evidence synthesized in this paper reveals varying responses (across countries and farmers) and patterns of price transmission (across local and international markets) while also highlighting the potential of fertilizer subsidy programs and other policy interventions to mitigate the effects of fertilizer price volatility and improve soil health, particularly in the midst of a climate crisis that adds uncertainty to agricultural production. From a longer-term perspective, much research is still needed to unpack the effects of this crisis—and the possible effects of future crises—on the international transmission of fertilizer price shocks, policy response options to both immediate shocks and more protracted threats, farm-level strategies to increase resilience to these shocks and to encourage more judicious fertilizer use and soil health management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000971\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000971","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数国家在发展的各个阶段都采取政策,通过施用无机肥料和管理土壤健康来提高农业生产力。不幸的是,全球和地方经济冲击可能迅速削弱这些政策的影响,从2020年开始的全球粮食、燃料和化肥价格危机中就可以明显看出这一点。本文以本期《粮食政策》特刊和其他近期文献贡献的证据为基础,综合了有关国际肥料市场近期冲击的规模、分布和应对措施的最新证据。现有证据表明,尽管国际肥料价格在2020-2022年期间大幅上涨,并在2024年之前保持在高于covid -19大流行前的水平,但对全球肥料需求的中期影响相对温和。然而,全球总量掩盖了重要的短期影响,包括许多低收入和中等收入国家小农生产系统中肥料使用减少和农业利润下降。尽管这些影响因国家而异,但对化肥进口的依赖和对特殊国内冲击的脆弱性可能是造成这些影响的关键因素。本文综合的证据揭示了不同的反应(在不同国家和农民之间)和价格传递模式(在本地和国际市场之间),同时也强调了肥料补贴计划和其他政策干预的潜力,以减轻肥料价格波动的影响,改善土壤健康,特别是在气候危机期间,增加了农业生产的不确定性。从更长期的角度来看,仍然需要进行大量的研究,以揭示这场危机以及未来危机对化肥价格冲击的国际传播的影响,对即时冲击和更持久威胁的政策应对方案,提高对这些冲击的抵御能力并鼓励更明智的肥料使用和土壤健康管理的农场层面战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fertilizer, soil health, and economic shocks: A synthesis of recent evidence
Most countries, at all stages of development, adopt policies to improve agricultural productivity through the application of inorganic fertilizer and the management of soil health. Unfortunately, global and local economic shocks can quickly erode the impact of these policies, as was evident during the global food, fuel, and fertilizer price crisis that began in 2020. This paper synthesizes recent evidence on the magnitude and distribution of—and responses to— the recent shocks to international fertilizer markets, building on evidence from this Special Issue of Food Policy and other recent contributions to the literature. The available evidence suggests that although international fertilizer prices increased dramatically in 2020–2022 and remained above their pre-COVID-19 pandemic level through 2024, the medium-term effects on global fertilizer demand were relatively modest. However, global aggregates obscure important short-term effects, including reduced fertilizer use and lower farm profits in smallholder production systems in many low- and middle-income countries. Although these effects varied considerably by country, dependence on fertilizer imports and vulnerability to idiosyncratic domestic shocks likely played a key role in driving these effects. The evidence synthesized in this paper reveals varying responses (across countries and farmers) and patterns of price transmission (across local and international markets) while also highlighting the potential of fertilizer subsidy programs and other policy interventions to mitigate the effects of fertilizer price volatility and improve soil health, particularly in the midst of a climate crisis that adds uncertainty to agricultural production. From a longer-term perspective, much research is still needed to unpack the effects of this crisis—and the possible effects of future crises—on the international transmission of fertilizer price shocks, policy response options to both immediate shocks and more protracted threats, farm-level strategies to increase resilience to these shocks and to encourage more judicious fertilizer use and soil health management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信