高血压和不健康饮酒的初级保健患者的血压控制:酒精简短干预的作用

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Stacy A Sterling, Vanessa A Palzes, Yun Lu, Andrea H Kline-Simon, Thekla B Ross, Constance M Weisner, Joseph Elson, Derek D Satre, Sameer Awsare, Asma Asyyed, Jamal Rana, Cynthia I Campbell, Verena E Metz, Felicia W Chi
{"title":"高血压和不健康饮酒的初级保健患者的血压控制:酒精简短干预的作用","authors":"Stacy A Sterling, Vanessa A Palzes, Yun Lu, Andrea H Kline-Simon, Thekla B Ross, Constance M Weisner, Joseph Elson, Derek D Satre, Sameer Awsare, Asma Asyyed, Jamal Rana, Cynthia I Campbell, Verena E Metz, Felicia W Chi","doi":"10.15288/jsad.24-00263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hypertension is highly prevalent in primary care. Unhealthy alcohol use can impact its management and associated cardiovascular disease risks. Alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) in primary care is effective for early intervention for unhealthy use, yet its effectiveness in heterogeneous populations in real-world settings remains unclear. Using electronic health records, we emulated a pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate the effects of receiving ASBI on drinking and blood pressure (BP) outcomes among primary care patients with hypertension and unhealthy alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This observational study identified 72,979 patients with hypertension who screened positive for unhealthy drinking between 1/1/2014 - 12/31/2017. We used a target trial framework to compare the effects of receiving ASBI (intervention) to not receiving BI (comparison) on drinking (change in heavy drinking days and drinks/week) and BP outcomes (changes in diastolic and systolic BP) from baseline to 2- and 5-year follow-ups. Treatment effect estimates were obtained using inverse probability weighted models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 2-years, the intervention condition had about 0.2 fewer heavy drinking days and about 0.1 fewer drinks/week than the comparison condition. The intervention condition had an additional -0.5 mmHg and -0.7 mmHg decline in diastolic and systolic BP, and 8% and 6% higher odds of having a ≥3mmHg reduction in diastolic and systolic BP, respectively, than the comparison condition. Between group differences in both outcomes diminished at 5-years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modest changes in drinking and blood pressure we found contribute to the emerging evidence that BI may benefit broader health outcomes on population-level.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood Pressure Control among Primary Care Patients with Hypertension and Unhealthy Alcohol Use: The Role of Alcohol Brief Interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Stacy A Sterling, Vanessa A Palzes, Yun Lu, Andrea H Kline-Simon, Thekla B Ross, Constance M Weisner, Joseph Elson, Derek D Satre, Sameer Awsare, Asma Asyyed, Jamal Rana, Cynthia I Campbell, Verena E Metz, Felicia W Chi\",\"doi\":\"10.15288/jsad.24-00263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hypertension is highly prevalent in primary care. Unhealthy alcohol use can impact its management and associated cardiovascular disease risks. Alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) in primary care is effective for early intervention for unhealthy use, yet its effectiveness in heterogeneous populations in real-world settings remains unclear. Using electronic health records, we emulated a pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate the effects of receiving ASBI on drinking and blood pressure (BP) outcomes among primary care patients with hypertension and unhealthy alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This observational study identified 72,979 patients with hypertension who screened positive for unhealthy drinking between 1/1/2014 - 12/31/2017. We used a target trial framework to compare the effects of receiving ASBI (intervention) to not receiving BI (comparison) on drinking (change in heavy drinking days and drinks/week) and BP outcomes (changes in diastolic and systolic BP) from baseline to 2- and 5-year follow-ups. Treatment effect estimates were obtained using inverse probability weighted models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 2-years, the intervention condition had about 0.2 fewer heavy drinking days and about 0.1 fewer drinks/week than the comparison condition. The intervention condition had an additional -0.5 mmHg and -0.7 mmHg decline in diastolic and systolic BP, and 8% and 6% higher odds of having a ≥3mmHg reduction in diastolic and systolic BP, respectively, than the comparison condition. Between group differences in both outcomes diminished at 5-years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modest changes in drinking and blood pressure we found contribute to the emerging evidence that BI may benefit broader health outcomes on population-level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00263\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:高血压在初级保健中非常普遍。不健康的酒精使用会影响其管理和相关的心血管疾病风险。初级保健中的酒精筛查和短暂干预(ASBI)对不健康饮酒的早期干预是有效的,但其在现实环境中异质人群中的有效性尚不清楚。使用电子健康记录,我们模拟了一项实用的临床试验,以评估接受ASBI对高血压和不健康饮酒的初级保健患者饮酒和血压(BP)结局的影响。方法:本观察性研究确定了2014年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间筛查为不健康饮酒阳性的72979例高血压患者。我们使用目标试验框架来比较接受ASBI(干预)和未接受BI(比较)对饮酒(重度饮酒天数和饮酒/周的变化)和BP结局(舒张压和收缩压的变化)从基线到2年和5年随访的影响。采用逆概率加权模型估计治疗效果。结果:在2年时,干预组的重度饮酒天数比对照组少0.2天,每周饮酒量少0.1天。干预组的舒张压和收缩压分别下降-0.5 mmHg和-0.7 mmHg,舒张压和收缩压降低≥3mmHg的几率分别比对照组高8%和6%。两组间的差异在5年时都减少了。结论:我们发现饮酒和血压的适度变化为BI可能在人群水平上有益于更广泛的健康结果提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blood Pressure Control among Primary Care Patients with Hypertension and Unhealthy Alcohol Use: The Role of Alcohol Brief Interventions.

Objective: Hypertension is highly prevalent in primary care. Unhealthy alcohol use can impact its management and associated cardiovascular disease risks. Alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) in primary care is effective for early intervention for unhealthy use, yet its effectiveness in heterogeneous populations in real-world settings remains unclear. Using electronic health records, we emulated a pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate the effects of receiving ASBI on drinking and blood pressure (BP) outcomes among primary care patients with hypertension and unhealthy alcohol use.

Method: This observational study identified 72,979 patients with hypertension who screened positive for unhealthy drinking between 1/1/2014 - 12/31/2017. We used a target trial framework to compare the effects of receiving ASBI (intervention) to not receiving BI (comparison) on drinking (change in heavy drinking days and drinks/week) and BP outcomes (changes in diastolic and systolic BP) from baseline to 2- and 5-year follow-ups. Treatment effect estimates were obtained using inverse probability weighted models.

Results: At 2-years, the intervention condition had about 0.2 fewer heavy drinking days and about 0.1 fewer drinks/week than the comparison condition. The intervention condition had an additional -0.5 mmHg and -0.7 mmHg decline in diastolic and systolic BP, and 8% and 6% higher odds of having a ≥3mmHg reduction in diastolic and systolic BP, respectively, than the comparison condition. Between group differences in both outcomes diminished at 5-years.

Conclusions: The modest changes in drinking and blood pressure we found contribute to the emerging evidence that BI may benefit broader health outcomes on population-level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信