重新学习外语词汇检索的理想困难。

IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Jonathan Serfaty
{"title":"重新学习外语词汇检索的理想困难。","authors":"Jonathan Serfaty","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the desirable difficulty framework, effortful successful retrievals are more effective than easy successful retrievals for promoting long-term memory. Research has also shown the vital importance of relearning for more durable memory, but no previous study has specifically examined the effects of difficulty conditions for relearning. In the present study, 50 participants learned 18 nonwords in one session and then retrieved them in a relearning session the following day either forward (retrieving the target word), backward (retrieving the meaning), or by copying. Successful retrieval could be in the first attempt or in a later round following feedback. The results showed that success in Round 1 was a strong predictor of later retention, especially for forward relearning in the productive test. Forward relearning led to higher retention when the round of retrieval success was controlled, particularly for productive knowledge. However, backward relearning allowed more words to be retrieved in Round 1, culminating in no overall differences in retention between the two directions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Desirable difficulties in relearning retrievals for foreign language vocabulary.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Serfaty\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>According to the desirable difficulty framework, effortful successful retrievals are more effective than easy successful retrievals for promoting long-term memory. Research has also shown the vital importance of relearning for more durable memory, but no previous study has specifically examined the effects of difficulty conditions for relearning. In the present study, 50 participants learned 18 nonwords in one session and then retrieved them in a relearning session the following day either forward (retrieving the target word), backward (retrieving the meaning), or by copying. Successful retrieval could be in the first attempt or in a later round following feedback. The results showed that success in Round 1 was a strong predictor of later retention, especially for forward relearning in the productive test. Forward relearning led to higher retention when the round of retrieval success was controlled, particularly for productive knowledge. However, backward relearning allowed more words to be retrieved in Round 1, culminating in no overall differences in retention between the two directions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001491\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据理想难度框架,努力成功的检索比简单成功的检索对促进长期记忆更有效。研究还表明,再学习对于更持久的记忆至关重要,但之前没有研究专门研究过难度条件对再学习的影响。在目前的研究中,50名参与者在一次学习中学习了18个非单词,然后在第二天的再学习中学习它们,或者是向前学习(检索目标单词),向后学习(检索含义),或者是通过复制。成功的检索可以在第一次尝试中进行,也可以在后续的反馈中进行。结果表明,在第一轮的成功是一个强有力的预测,以后的记忆,特别是前向再学习的生产力测试。前向再学习在检索成功的回合受到控制时,会导致更高的记忆保留,特别是对于生产性知识。然而,向后再学习允许在第一轮中检索更多的单词,最终在两个方向之间的记忆没有总体差异。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Desirable difficulties in relearning retrievals for foreign language vocabulary.

According to the desirable difficulty framework, effortful successful retrievals are more effective than easy successful retrievals for promoting long-term memory. Research has also shown the vital importance of relearning for more durable memory, but no previous study has specifically examined the effects of difficulty conditions for relearning. In the present study, 50 participants learned 18 nonwords in one session and then retrieved them in a relearning session the following day either forward (retrieving the target word), backward (retrieving the meaning), or by copying. Successful retrieval could be in the first attempt or in a later round following feedback. The results showed that success in Round 1 was a strong predictor of later retention, especially for forward relearning in the productive test. Forward relearning led to higher retention when the round of retrieval success was controlled, particularly for productive knowledge. However, backward relearning allowed more words to be retrieved in Round 1, culminating in no overall differences in retention between the two directions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信